Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments
- First Online: 30 October 2021
Cite this chapter
- Joseph Zajda 36
Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 25))
3702 Accesses
9 Citations
This chapter analyses constructivism and the use of constructivist learning theory in schools, in order to create effective learning environments for all students. It discusses various conceptual approaches to constructivist pedagogy. The key idea of constructivism is that meaningful knowledge and critical thinking are actively constructed, in a cognitive, cultural, emotional, and social sense, and that individual learning is an active process, involving engagement and participation in the classroom. This idea is most relevant to the process of creating effective learning environments in schools globally. It is argued that the effectiveness of constructivist learning and teaching is dependent on students’ characteristics, cognitive, social and emotional development, individual differences, cultural diversity, motivational atmosphere and teachers’ classroom strategies, school’s location, and the quality of teachers. The chapter offers some insights as to why and how constructivist learning theory and constructivist pedagogy could be useful in supporting other popular and effective approaches to improve learning, performance, standards and teaching. Suggestions are made on how to apply constructivist learning theory and how to develop constructivist pedagogy, with a range of effective strategies for enhancing meaningful learning and critical thinking in the classroom, and improving academic standards.
The unexamined life is not worth living (Socrates, 399 BCE).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Abdullah Alwaqassi, S. (2017). The use of multisensory in schools . Indiana University. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/21663/Master%20Thesis%20in%
Acton, G., & Schroeder, D. (2001). Sensory discrimination as related to general intelligence. Intelligence, 29 , 263–271.
Google Scholar
Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level. Educational Research Review, 12 (22), 1074–1079.
Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3 , 319–363.
Akpan, J., & Beard, B. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Journal of Educational Research , 4 (2), 392–398. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1089692.pdf
Al Sayyed Obaid, M. (2013). The impact of using multi-sensory approach for teaching students with learning disabilities. Journal of International Education Research , 9 (1), 75–82. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1010855
Alt, D. (2017).Constructivist learning and openness to diversity and challenge in higher education environments. Learning Environments Research, 20 , 99–119. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9223-8
Arends, R. (1998). Learning to teach . Boston: McGraw Hill.
Ayaz, M. F., & Şekerci, H. (2015). The effects of the constructivist learning approach on student’s academic achievement: A meta-analysis study . Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1072.4600&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Barlett, F. (1932), Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: CUP.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory . New York: General Learning Press.
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2006). Innovations in teacher education: A social constructivist approach . New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Black, A., & Ammon, P. (1992). A developmental-constructivist approach to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (5), 323–335.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms . Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education . New York: Vintage Books.
Bynum, W. F., & Porter, R. (Eds.). (2005). Oxford dictionary of scientific quotations . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carnoy, M. (1999). Globalization and education reforms: What planners need to know . Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Crogman, H., & Trebeau Crogman, M. (2016). Generated questions learning model (GQLM): Beyond learning styles . Retrieved from https://www.cogentoa.com/article/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1202460
Dangel, J. R. (2011). An analysis of research on constructivist teacher education . Retreived from https://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/85/361
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education . New York: Collier Books.
Doll, W. (1993). A post-modem perspective on curriculum . New York: Teachers College Press.
Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. E. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31 (1), 71–103.
Dunn, R., & Smith, J. B. (1990). Chapter four: Learning styles and library media programs. In J. B. Smith (Ed.), School library media annual (pp. 32–49). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Dunn, R., et al. (2009). Impact of learning-style instructional strategies on students’ achievement and attitudes: Perceptions of educators in diverse institutions. The Clearing House, 82 (3), 135–140. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30181095
Fontana, D. (1995). Psychology for teachers . London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (1989). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice . New York: Teacher's College Press.
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice . New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century . New York: Basic Books.
Gredler, M. E. (1997). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gupta, N., & Tyagi, H. K. (2017). Constructivist based pedagogy for academic improvement at elementary level . Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321018062_constructivist_based_pedagogy_for_academic_improvement_at_elementary_level
Guzzini, S. (2000). A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6 , 147–182.
Hirtle, J. (1996). Social constructivism . English Journal, 85 (1), 91. Retrieved from. https://search.proquest.com/docview/237276544?accountid=8194
Howe, K., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education (pp. 19–40). Illinois: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Hunter, W. (2015). Teaching for engagement: part 1: Constructivist principles, case-based teaching, and active learning . Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301950392_Teaching_for_Engagement_Part_1_Co
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34 (4), 34–37.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 89–121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kelly, G. A. (1955/1991). The psychology of personal constructs . Norton (Reprinted by Routledge, London, 1991).
Kharb, P. et al. (2013). The learning styles and the preferred teaching—Learning strategies of first year medical students . Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3708205/
Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology . http://www.coe.uga.edu/epltt/SocialConstructivism.htm
Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6 (1), 7–19.
Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group process . London: John Wiley.
Kukla, A. (2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science . London: Routledge.
Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2012). Vygotsky and sociocultural approaches to teaching and learning . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207006
Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint . Albany: SUNY.
Matthews, M. (2000). Constructivism in science and mathematics education. In C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education, ninety-ninth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 159–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maypole, J., & Davies, T. (2001). Students’ perceptions of constructivist learning in a Community College American History 11 Survey Course . Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210102900205
McInerney, D. M., & McInerney, V. (2018). Educational psychology: Constructing learning (5th ed.). Sydney: Pearson.
McLeod, S. (2019). Constructivism as a theory for teaching and learning . Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
OECD. (2007). Equity and quality in education . Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009a). Key factors in developing effective learning environments: Classroom disciplinary climate and teachers’ self-efficacy. In Creating effective teaching and learning environments . Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009b). Education at a glance . Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009c). The schooling for tomorrow . Paris: OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation & assessment . Retrieved from // www.oecd.org/edu/school/Evaluation_and_Assessment_Synthesis_Report.pdf
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 results (volume III): What school life means for students’ lives . Paris: OECD.
Oldfather, P., West, J., White, J., & Wilmarth, J. (1999). Learning through children’s eyes: Social constructivism and the desire to learn . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
O’Loughin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2 (8), 791–820.
Onuf, N. (2003). Parsing personal identity: Self, other, agent. In F. Debrix (Ed.), Language, agency and politics in a constructed world (pp. 26–49). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Onuf, N. G. (2013). World of our making . Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Packer, M., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35 (4), 227–241.
Phillips, D. (2000). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education, Ninety-ninth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1 (pp. 1–16). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance (Biology and knowledge). Gallimard.
Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (W. Mays, Trans.). Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures . (A. Rosin, Trans.). The Viking Press.
Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. S. (1971). Teaching as a subversive activity . Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Puacharearn, P. (2004). The effectiveness of constructivist teaching on improving learning environments in thai secondary school science classrooms . Doctor of Science Education thesis. Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved from https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/2329/14877_
Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105 (9), 1623–1640.
Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (4), 609–616.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality . New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom . Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598340.pdf
Sharma, H. L., & Sharma, L. (2012). Effect of constructivist approach on academic achievement of seventh grade learners in Mathematics. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2 (10), 1–2.
Shively, J. (2015). Constructivism in music education. Arts Education Policy Review: Constructivism, Policy, and Arts Education, 116 (3), 128–136.
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Slavin, R. (1984). Effective classrooms, effective schools: A research base for reform in Latin American education . Retrieved from http://www.educoas.org/Portal/bdigital/contenido/interamer/BkIACD/Interamer/
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Education psychology: theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Steffe, L., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education . Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Stoffers, M. (2011). Using a multi-sensory teaching approach to impact learning and community in a second-grade classroom . Retrieved from https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=etd
Thomas, A., Menon, A., Boruff, J., et al. (2014). Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Implementation Science, 9 , 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-54 .
Article Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (2000). Radical constructivism: Reflections and directions. In L. P. Steffe & P. W. Thompson (Eds.), Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glasersfeld (pp. 412–448). London: Falmer Press.
von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning . London: The Falmer Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934a). Myshlenie i rech (Thought and language). State Socio-Economic Publishing House (translated in 1986 by Alex Kozulin, MIT).
Vygotsky. (1934b). Thought and language . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1968). The psychology of art . Moscow: Art.
Vygotsky, L. (1973). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. and Ed.). The MIT Press. (Originally published in Russian in 1934.)
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, J. (2003). Social constructivism in the classroom . Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9604.00206
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2008a). Learning and teaching (2nd ed.). Melbourne: James Nicholas Publishers.
Zajda, J. (2008b). Aptitude. In G. McCulloch & D. Crook (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education . London: Routledge.
Zajda, J. (2008c). Globalisation, education and social stratification. In J. Zajda, B. Biraimah, & W. Gaudelli (Eds.), Education and social inequality in the global culture (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (2018a). Motivation in the classroom: Creating effective learning environments. Educational Practice & Theory, 40 (2), 85–103.
Zajda, J. (2018b). Effective constructivist pedagogy for quality learning in schools. Educational Practice & Theory, 40 (1), 67–80.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2020a). Globalisation, ideology and education reforms: Emerging paradigms . Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J. (Ed.). (2021). 3rd international handbook of globalisation, education and policy research . Dordrecht: Springer.
Zajda, J., & Majhanovich, S. (Eds.). (2021). Globalisation, cultural identity and nation-building: The changing paradigms . Dordrecht: Springer.
Zaphir, L. (2019). Can schools implement constructivism as an education philosophy? Retrieved from https://www.studyinternational.com/news/constructivism-education/
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Faculty of Education & Arts, School of Education, Australian Catholic University, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Joseph Zajda
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. In: Globalisation and Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Published : 30 October 2021
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-030-71574-8
Online ISBN : 978-3-030-71575-5
eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
- About Violence Prevention
- Resources for Action
- Cardiff Model
Violence Prevention
About The Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention
Violence Topics
About Adverse Childhood Experiences
About Child Abuse and Neglect
About Community Violence
About Firearm Injury and Death
About Intimate Partner Violence
About Sexual Violence
About Youth Violence
About Abuse of Older Persons
About Violence Against Children and Youth Surveys
About The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS)
About The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS)
Featured Resources
Essentials for Parenting Teens
Essentials for Parenting Toddlers and Preschoolers
Cardiff Violence Prevention Model Toolkit
Violence is an urgent public health problem. CDC is committed to preventing violence so that everyone can be safe and healthy.
For Everyone
Public health.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Present Demographics. Present the descriptive data: explaining the age, gender, or relevant related information on the population (describe the sample). Summarize the demographics of the sample, and present in a table format after the narration (Simon, 2006). Otherwise, the table is included as an Appendix and referred to in the narrative of ...
For statistical modeling purposes, responses were recoded into one of three categories: negative reputation (score of 1, 2, or 3; about 18.5% of respondents), positive reputation (score of 4 or 5; about 24.8% of respondents), and no reputation (score of 6; about 56.7% of respondents).". Example 2. This example shows how one explains reverse ...
from this study. The analysis and interpretation of data is carried out in two phases. The. first part, which is based on the results of the questionnaire, deals with a quantitative. analysis of data. The second, which is based on the results of the interview and focus group. discussions, is a qualitative interpretation.
4.1 INTRODUCTION. This chapter will outline the qualitative data collection methods used, describe the analytic techniques employed as well as presenting the findings from this phase of the research study. The findings will be fully discussed with links to current literature identified in Chapter 1. The characteristics of the research ...
Chapter 4. Discuss the results/ findings by confirming it with previous. studies. Draw conclusion. List recommendation for future study based on the. limitation (s) of your study. Chapter 5 ...
A well-written Chapter 5 should include information about the following: Summary of findings. Interpretation of findings. Context of findings. Implications of findings. Discussion on limitations of study. Discussion on future directions of research/field.
Sharing an outline of chapter four and five general sections enables dissertation. online mentors teach how to write chapter four and five to dissertation students. Gathering and analyzing data should be fun; the student's passion clearly present in the. last two chapters of the dissertation.
parts: the Introduction (Chapter 1), the Review of Related Literature and/or Research (Chapter 2), and the Methodology (Chapter 3). The completed dissertation begins with the same three chapters and concludes with two additional chapters that report research findings (Chapter 4) and conclusions, discussion, and recommendations (Chapter 5).
research. • Explain the concept of synthesis as an ongoing process. • Describe how to go about presenting a final synthesis. Section II: Application • Presentation of a completed analysis and interpretation chapter based on the content and process as described earlier. The previous chapter discussed how to present the findings of your ...
Chapter 4. What needs to be included in the chapter? The topics below are typically included in this chapter, and often in this order (check with your Chair): Introduction. Remind the reader what your research questions were. In a qualitative study you will restate the research questions. In a quantitative study you will present the hypotheses.
4. A second section in the discussion chapter addresses and explores implications for practice. For the sake of clarity, create separate sections for implications that involve research, professional practice, or policy. 5. When preparing the conclusion section, imagine giving a brief talk to your colleagues. Based
PDF | On Feb 19, 2020, Teddy Kinyongo published CHAPTER FOUR DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 4.0 Introduction | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
The Discussion is generally the hardest part of the paper to write. It is often subject to the most mistakes by the author. Most of these mistakes relate to i) not highlight-ing your key findings, ii) not differentiating your work from others, iii) writing long paragraphs, iv) not mentioning your limitations.
Chapter 1 Introduction (Broad Overview of the Research) Chapter 2 Review of the Literature (and Conceptual Framework) Chapter 3 Methodology . Chapter 4 Results . Chapter 5 Interpretations, Conclusions, and Recommendations . References . Appendices . GSEHD requires that dissertation proposals include the elements normally found in Chapters 1,
4.1 INTRODUCTION. In this chapter, I describe the qualitative analysis of the data, including the practical steps involved in the analysis. A quantitative analysis of the data follows in Chapter 5. In the qualitative phase, I analyzed the data into generative themes, which will be described individually. I describe how the themes overlap.
DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF RES EARCH FINDINGS 4.1 Introduction. The chapter contains presentation, analysis and dis cussion of the data collected by the researcher. during the data ...
Dissertation Chapter 5 Sample. be research. CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION be. The purpose of this qualitative grounded theory study was to identify what motivates. Outline the organization. women to stay in or return to STEM professions, leading to a model of motivation. This.
older represented 10% of the sample, 35% were between 51 and 60, 20% were between the. ages of 41-50. The 31-40 age group was also 20% of the sample and 15% of the participants. declined to answer. Graphic displays of demographics on company size, work status, age, and industry sector are provided in Appendix F.
4.1 INTRODUCTION. This chapter describes the analysis of data followed by a discussion of the research findings. The findings relate to the research questions that guided the study. Data were analyzed to identify, describe and explore the relationship between death anxiety and death attitudes of nurses in a private acute care hospital and to ...
4. Findings 5. Analysis and synthesis 6. Conclusions and recommendations Chapter 1: Introduction This chapter makes a case for the signifi-cance of the problem, contextualizes the study, and provides an introduction to its basic components. It should be informative and able to stand alone as a document. • Introduction: The introduction ...
educational research, which enables you to make informed decisions as to the relevance of subsequent chapters. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to both education and research, before analysing what is meant by 'educational research'. The various features for each chapter are introduced with an explanation as to why they have been included.
In this research there are 539 cases or respondents, so it is clear that the research sample is sufficient to apply multiple regression analysis. Sequential or hierarchical analysis of a set of independent variables may often produce the coefficients necessary to answer the scientific questions at hand. In the 36 4 Discussion of Research ...
Home | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Jonassen's ( 1994) description of 8 pedagogical practices that differentiate constructivist learning from other learning environments is a succinct and practical summary of the constructivist perspective: 1. Constructivist learning environments provide multiple representations of reality. 2.
Provider Manual Title: Mental Health Services Revision Date: 5/15/2024 Chapter IV: Covered Services and Limitations Page: 28 _____ f. Collect or use Medicaid or FAMIS confidential information or Medicaid or FAMIS protected health information (PHI), as that term is defined in Health ...
The conclusions are as stated below: i. Students' use of language in the oral sessions depicted their beliefs and values. based on their intentions. The oral sessions prompted the students to be ...
About Violence Prevention. CDC works to prevent violence by understanding the factors that influence violence. Apr. 9, 2024. About The Public Health Approach to Violence Prevention. The public health approach is a four-step process that can be applied to prevent violence. Apr. 9, 2024.
Section 25-4-5 - [Effective Until 7/1/2024] Creation of commission; composition; appointment of members; terms of office; successors; appointment of member by Chief Justice of Supreme Court (1) There is hereby created the Mississippi Ethics Commission which shall be composed of eight (8) members, each of whom shall be a qualified elector of the State of Mississippi, of good moral character and ...
{"copyright":{"disclosedInvention":false,"licenseType":"NO","containsThirdPartyMaterial":false,"containsIndication":false,"determinationType":"GOV_PUBLIC_USE ...
4.7.3.1.Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Occurrences. Of the 186 occurrence records within this core area provided by the Roseburg Fish and Wildlife Office (Friedman, in litt. 2021), 135 (73%) are within mapped protected lands and 51 (27%) are outside of mapped protected lands (Figure 4.11, Figure 4.12).