Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Design Science Research in Doctoral Projects: An Analysis of Australian Theses
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Related Papers
ICT Education
Hanlie Smuts
Design science research (DSR) is well-known in different domains, including information systems (IS), for the construction of artefacts. One of the most challenging aspects of IS postgraduate studies (with DSR) is determining the structure of the study and its report, which should reflect all the components necessary to build a convincing argument in support of such a study’s claims or assertions. Analysing several postgraduate IS-DSR reports as examples, this paper presents a mapping between recommendable structures for research reports and the DSR process model of Vaishnavi and Kuechler, which several of our current postgraduate students have found helpful.
Management Information Systems Quarterly
Shirley Gregor
Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline
Manuel Meireles
Aim/Purpose: To discuss the Design Science Research approach by comparing some of its canons with observed practices in projects in which it is applied, in order to understand and structure it better. Background: Recent criticisms of the application of the Design Science Research (DSR) approach have pointed out the need to make it more approachable and less confusing to overcome deficiencies such as the unrealistic evaluation. Methodology: We identified and analyzed 92 articles that presented artifacts developed from DSR projects and another 60 articles with preceding or subsequent actions associated with these 92 projects. We applied the content analysis technique to these 152 articles, enabling the preparation of network diagrams and an analysis of the longitudinal evolution of these projects in terms of activities performed and the types of artifacts involved. Contribution: The content analysis of these 152 articles enabled the preparation of network diagrams and an analysis of t...
Tuure Tuunanen , Kenneth Peffers , Johanna Bragge
Rahul Thakurta
Design science is an increasingly popular research paradigm in the information systems discipline. De- spite a recognition of the design science research par- adigm, questions are being raised about the nature of its existence and its contributions. Central to this ar- gument is the understanding of the relationship be- tween “theoretical research” and “design research” and the necessary implications for design. In this re- search, we contribute to this discourse by carrying out a structured literature review in order to appreciate the current state of the art in design science research. The results identify an incongruence between the methodological guidelines informing the design and how the design is carried out in practice. On the basis of our observations on the design process, the theoreti- cal foundations of design, and the design outcomes, we outline some research directions that we believe will contribute to methodically well-executed design sci- ence contributions in the f...
Proceedings of the 4th …
Olga Levina , Udo Bub
Discussions about the body of knowledge of information systems, including the research domain, relevant perspectives and methods have been going on for a long time. Many researchers vote for a combination of research perspectives and their respective research methodologies; rigour and relevance as requirements in design science are generally accepted. What has been lacking is a formalisation of a detailed research process for design science that takes into account all requirements. We have developed such a research process, building on top of existing processes and findings from design research. The process combines qualitative and quantitative research and references well-known research methods. Publication possibilities and self-contained work packages are recommended. Case studies using the process are presented and discussed.
Diane Strode , Susan Chard
Design science is a research paradigm where the development and evaluation of an artefact is a key contribution. Design science is used in many domains and this paper draws on those domains to formulate a generic structure for design science research suitable for small-scale postgraduate information technology research projects. The paper includes guidelines for writing proposals and a generic research report structure. The paper presents ethical issues to consider in design science research and contributes guidelines for assessment.
Design Science Research Cases
Jan vom Brocke
Design Science Research (DSR) is a problem-solving paradigm that seeks to enhance human knowledge via the creation of innovative artifacts. Simply stated, DSR seeks to enhance technology and science knowledge bases via the creation of innovative artifacts that solve problems and improve the environment in which they are instantiated. The results of DSR include both the newly designed artifacts and design knowledge (DK) that provides a fuller understanding via design theories of why the artifacts enhance (or, disrupt) the relevant application contexts. The goal of this introduction chapter is to provide a brief survey of DSR concepts for better understanding of the following chapters that present DSR case studies.
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
Seyum Getenet
Aim/Purpose: We show a new dimension to the process of using design-based research approach in doctoral dissertations. Background: Design-based research is a long-term and concentrated approach to educational inquiry. It is often a recommendation that doctoral students should not attempt to adopt this approach for their doctoral dissertations. In this paper, we document two doctoral dissertations that used a design-based research approach in two different contexts. Methodology : The study draws on a qualitative analysis of the methodological approaches of two doctoral dissertations through the lenses of Herrington, McKenney, Reeves and Oliver principles of design-based research approach. Contribution: The findings of this study add a new dimension to using design-based research approach in doctoral dissertations in shorter-term and less intensive contexts. Findings: The results of this study indicate that design-based research is not only an effective methodological approach in doct...
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Alta Van der Merwe
RELATED PAPERS
rakesh kumar
Mukmin Alimun
Pensata: Revista dos Alunos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da UNIFESP
Carolina Guerrero Valencia
vimmi.inesc-id.pt
tiago cardoso
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Alexander Korsunsky
Scott Norville
Senanu Klutse
JURNAL TEKNO GLOBAL UIGM FAKULTAS TEKNIK
Azwar Azwar
Cogent Business & Management
aref gholami
Environmental Earth Sciences
Andrzej Plak
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Reinforced Plastics
Joost van Rooij
The behavior analyst today
Christopher Bass
Open Journal of Business and Management
Pius Bassey
Translational Andrology and Urology
Deepak Batura
2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C.
June 29-30, 2017 London (UK) Back CABES-17, RTSET-17, SHSS-17, BELIS-17
Dr. Satinder Bhatia
Journal of Cleaner Production
Veniamin Karatzoglou
Historia y sociedad
Laura Gaviria Vargas
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Sunjeev Kamboj
RELATED TOPICS
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
- eLibrary Home
- eLibrary Login
- < Previous
Home > CHAPTERS > ACIS > ACIS2017 > 112
ACIS 2017 Proceedings
Choosing a design science research methodology.
John R. Venable , Curtin University Follow Jan Pries-Heje , Roskilde University Follow Richard L. Baskerville , Curtin University and Georgia State University Follow
Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison Framework that we adapted from an existing Information Systems Development Methodology Comparison Framework. Based on the outcomes of the comparison, we develop a set of technological rules that forms a contingency-based framework to support Design Science Researchers in choosing an appropriate and well-suited DSR methodology, depending on the contingencies of the situation at hand.
Keywords Design Science Research (DSR), Design Science Research Methodology, Research Design, Methodology Comparison, Design Theory, Technological Rule
Recommended Citation
Venable, John R.; Pries-Heje, Jan; and Baskerville, Richard L., "Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology" (2017). ACIS 2017 Proceedings . 112. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2017/112
Since December 06, 2019
Advanced Search
- Notify me via email or RSS
- ACIS 2017 Proceedings Website
- All Content
Author Corner
- eLibrary FAQ
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright
A Method Framework for Design Science Research
- First Online: 01 January 2014
Cite this chapter
- Paul Johannesson 3 &
- Erik Perjons 3
15k Accesses
8 Citations
In order to produce reliable results, design science studies need to make use of research strategies and methods as well as base their work on a scientific body of knowledge. This chapter proposes a method framework for design science research that supports researchers in producing relevant as well as rigorous research. Five key activities are identified: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation. Two tools for visualising the design science process are introduced: an IDEF0 process diagram and a canvas format. Finally, the chapter discusses the relationships between the proposed framework and the scientific method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Alturki A, Gable GG, Bandara W (2011) A design science research roadmap. In: Jain H, Sinha AP, Vitharana P (eds) Service-oriented perspectives in design science research. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–123
Chapter Google Scholar
Alturki A, Gable G, Bandara W (2013) The design science research roadmap: In Progress evaluation. PACIS 2013 proceedings
Google Scholar
Bai X, White D, Sundaram D (2013) Multi-methodological approaches in design science: a review, proposal and application. In: PACIS 2013 proceedings, Paper 159. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2013/159
Beck R, Weber S, Gregory RW (2013) Theory-generating design science research. Inf Syst Front 15:637–651. doi: 10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4
Article Google Scholar
Eekels J, Roozenburg NFM (1991) A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences. Des Stud 12:197–203. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90031-Q
FIPS (1993) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0), Draft Federal Information Processing Standards, Publication 183. www.idef.com/downloads/pdf/idef0.pdf . Accessed 3 Jul 2014
Fischer C, Gregor S (2011) Forms of reasoning in the design science research process. In: Jain H, Sinha A, Vitharana P (eds) Service-oriented perspectives in design science research. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 17–31
Gimbel S (2011) Exploring the scientific method: cases and questions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Book Google Scholar
Goldkuhl G (2012) From action research to practice research. Aust J Inf Syst 17:57–78. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v17i2.688
Goldkuhl G, Lind M (2010) A multi-grounded design research process. In: Winter R, Zhao JL, Aier S (eds) Global perspectives on design science research. Springer, Berlin, pp 45–60
Gregory RW (2011) Design science research and the grounded theory method: characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. In: Heinzl A, Buxmann P, Wendt O, Weitzel T (eds) Theory-guided modeling and empiricism in information systems research. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 111–127
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28:75–105
Kuechler B, Vaishnavi V (2008) On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur J Inf Syst 17:489–504. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.40
Nunamaker Jr J, Twyman N, Giboney J (2013) Breaking out of the design science box: high-value impact through multidisciplinary design science programs of research. AMCIS 2013 Proceedings
Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 24:45–77. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Sein M, Henfridsson O, Purao S et al (2011) Action design research. Manag Inf Syst Q 35:37–56
Wagter R, Proper HA, Witte D (2013) Developing the GEA method—design science and case-study research in action. In: Franch X, Soffer P (eds) Advanced information systems engineering workshops. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–57
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Stockholm University, Kista, Sweden
Paul Johannesson & Erik Perjons
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Johannesson, P., Perjons, E. (2014). A Method Framework for Design Science Research. In: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10632-8_4
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10632-8_4
Published : 12 September 2014
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-319-10631-1
Online ISBN : 978-3-319-10632-8
eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
COMMENTS
This research applies the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) in order to develop a new artifact: a goal-driven dashboard design method. The DSRM process has six steps: problem identi cation and motivation, de nition of the objectives for a solution, design and development, demonstration, evaluation, and communication. Design and development
The design science research methodology. (DSRM) presented here incorporates principles, practices, and procedures required to. carry out such research and meets three objectives: it is consistent ...
The present thesis follows the design science research methodology and aims at including game elements in an e-negotiation training to improve participants' motivation, engagement, and their learning outcomes. The problems stemming from insufficient motivation and engagement have already been outlined in the introduction and define the ...
Design Science Research (DSR) is a problem-solving paradigm that seeks to enhance human. knowledge via the creation of innovative artifacts. Simply stated, DSR seeks to enhance. technology and ...
This chapter proposes a method framework for design science research that can support researchers in producing relevant as well as rigorous research. Five key activities are identified: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation.
Design science. The aim of the work presented here was to identify a methodology by using design science research techniques to study the development of the LCC model and the iterative refinement of the labs' design in order to improve the students' understanding of transient responses in electric circuits. Mitcham (Citation 1994), for example, has pointed out the importance of design in ...
A design science research approach is chosen to address the outlined research gaps and ensure both, relevance and rigor, throughout the process. Infiltrating de-sign thinking approaches into the design science research process (DSRP) further supports the development of an appropriate artifact. Eventually yielding a design artifact, the research ...
new methodology, a potential artifact in design research. Of the 15 articles, just two could arguably be considered DS research (see Appendix I for details). Given that many software engineering or computer science papers take such a design science approach (Morrison et al. 1995), we wonder why it shouldn't be happening in IS.
The design science research methodology (DSRM) emphasises the design and construction of applicable artefacts, such as systems, applications, methods, ... Concurrent evaluation of the artefact with other activities is an ADR thesis. Reflection and learning is a continuous stage; it should parallel problem formulation and building. ...
To conduct design science research (DSR) it is expected that some form of process model must be used, where each stage is explicitly outlined in the presentation of the research, with clear explanations. ... Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems ...
First we give an account of the most commonly used DSR methodologies. Next we choose a Nexus-approach as our research method. We then compare and contrast DSR methodologies and develop a contingency-based framework that can help Design Science Researchers choosing methodology dependent on the situation at hand.
Of the various design science research methodologies proposed, the methodology proposed by Wieringa [14] is the most comprehensive, except for the detailed activities and processes identified for ...
the application of this methodology to the 'Sustainable Business Transformation' design science research project. Keywords Design science research, artefact creation, artefact evaluation, research methodology. INTRODUCTION Traditional research in the physical sciences is concerned with the what whereas fields such as engineering and
The present thesis follows the design science research methodology and aims at including game elements in an e-negotiation training to improve participants' motivation, engagement, and their learning outcomes. The problems stemming from insufficient motivation and engagement have already been outlined in the introduction and define the ...
students. This is followed by an overview of the research method used to collect and analyse the data, and summary of the data collected. We conclude the paper with a brief discussion of the findings, including a set of guidelines that could be used by the PhD student considering DSR as research approach. The Nature of Design Science Research
Design science research (DSR) is well-known in different domains, including information systems (IS), for the construction of artefacts. One of the most challenging aspects of IS postgraduate studies (with DSR) is determining the structure of the study and its report, which should reflect all the components necessary to build a convincing argument in support of such a study's claims or ...
Design Science Research (DSR) is a popular new research approach and paradigm, for which a number of research methodologies have been developed. One of the challenges facing researchers wanting to apply this new approach is the choice of research methodology. In this paper we give an account of six DSR methodologies and we compare them using a Design Science Research Methodology Comparison ...
ence with applying the design science research methodology. [3]- [6]. Design science research is a constructive research. methodology, which focuses on solving a concrete problem. through the ...
1. Design research 2. Empirical knowledge questions problems (a.k.a. - To ask questions about the real technical research world. questions) 3. Analytical knowledge questions. - To improve some kind of artifact in some kind of - To ask questions about the logical context. consequences of definitions. 14. Template for design problems.
Digital Scholarship @UNLV | UNLV Libraries
This chapter will elaborate on the design of the research described in this paper. First this chapter will provide a brief description of design science on which the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) of Peffers et al. (2007) is based. This particular methodology forms the basis of the paper's research design.
The Design Science Methodology is defined as a standard that aims to create inventions that clarify the ideas, processes, technological capacities, and products that may be used to efficiently ...
This chapter proposes a method framework for design science research that supports researchers in producing relevant as well as rigorous research. Five key activities are identified: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation.
Consequently, there is a need for research on vibration isolators tailored to specific drone types and optical equipment payloads. This study focuses on exploring the correlation between the natural frequencies of drones and the weight of the payload, and proposes methods for developing and testing vibration isolators that consider both factors.
This study presents a novel microfluidic mixer designed, fabricated, and characterized using additive manufacturing technology — stereolithography (SLA) — and harnessing capillarity principles achieved through microstructure patterning. Micromixers are integral components in optimizing mixing and reaction processes within microfluidic systems. The proposed microdevice employs a tank mixing ...