2. variables
3. variables
4. variables
5. variables
6. variables
7. variables
8. variables
The simplest way to understand a variable is as any characteristic or attribute that can experience change or vary over time or context – hence the name “variable”. For example, the dosage of a particular medicine could be classified as a variable, as the amount can vary (i.e., a higher dose or a lower dose). Similarly, gender, age or ethnicity could be considered demographic variables, because each person varies in these respects.
Within research, especially scientific research, variables form the foundation of studies, as researchers are often interested in how one variable impacts another, and the relationships between different variables. For example:
As you can see, variables are often used to explain relationships between different elements and phenomena. In scientific studies, especially experimental studies, the objective is often to understand the causal relationships between variables. In other words, the role of cause and effect between variables. This is achieved by manipulating certain variables while controlling others – and then observing the outcome. But, we’ll get into that a little later…
Variables can be a little intimidating for new researchers because there are a wide variety of variables, and oftentimes, there are multiple labels for the same thing. To lay a firm foundation, we’ll first look at the three main types of variables, namely:
Simply put, the independent variable is the “ cause ” in the relationship between two (or more) variables. In other words, when the independent variable changes, it has an impact on another variable.
For example:
It’s useful to know that independent variables can go by a few different names, including, explanatory variables (because they explain an event or outcome) and predictor variables (because they predict the value of another variable). Terminology aside though, the most important takeaway is that independent variables are assumed to be the “cause” in any cause-effect relationship. As you can imagine, these types of variables are of major interest to researchers, as many studies seek to understand the causal factors behind a phenomenon.
While the independent variable is the “ cause ”, the dependent variable is the “ effect ” – or rather, the affected variable . In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable.
Keeping with the previous example, let’s look at some dependent variables in action:
In scientific studies, researchers will typically pay very close attention to the dependent variable (or variables), carefully measuring any changes in response to hypothesised independent variables. This can be tricky in practice, as it’s not always easy to reliably measure specific phenomena or outcomes – or to be certain that the actual cause of the change is in fact the independent variable.
As the adage goes, correlation is not causation . In other words, just because two variables have a relationship doesn’t mean that it’s a causal relationship – they may just happen to vary together. For example, you could find a correlation between the number of people who own a certain brand of car and the number of people who have a certain type of job. Just because the number of people who own that brand of car and the number of people who have that type of job is correlated, it doesn’t mean that owning that brand of car causes someone to have that type of job or vice versa. The correlation could, for example, be caused by another factor such as income level or age group, which would affect both car ownership and job type.
To confidently establish a causal relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable (i.e., X causes Y), you’ll typically need an experimental design , where you have complete control over the environmen t and the variables of interest. But even so, this doesn’t always translate into the “real world”. Simply put, what happens in the lab sometimes stays in the lab!
As an alternative to pure experimental research, correlational or “ quasi-experimental ” research (where the researcher cannot manipulate or change variables) can be done on a much larger scale more easily, allowing one to understand specific relationships in the real world. These types of studies also assume some causality between independent and dependent variables, but it’s not always clear. So, if you go this route, you need to be cautious in terms of how you describe the impact and causality between variables and be sure to acknowledge any limitations in your own research.
In an experimental design, a control variable (or controlled variable) is a variable that is intentionally held constant to ensure it doesn’t have an influence on any other variables. As a result, this variable remains unchanged throughout the course of the study. In other words, it’s a variable that’s not allowed to vary – tough life 🙂
As we mentioned earlier, one of the major challenges in identifying and measuring causal relationships is that it’s difficult to isolate the impact of variables other than the independent variable. Simply put, there’s always a risk that there are factors beyond the ones you’re specifically looking at that might be impacting the results of your study. So, to minimise the risk of this, researchers will attempt (as best possible) to hold other variables constant . These factors are then considered control variables.
Some examples of variables that you may need to control include:
Which specific variables need to be controlled for will vary tremendously depending on the research project at hand, so there’s no generic list of control variables to consult. As a researcher, you’ll need to think carefully about all the factors that could vary within your research context and then consider how you’ll go about controlling them. A good starting point is to look at previous studies similar to yours and pay close attention to which variables they controlled for.
Of course, you won’t always be able to control every possible variable, and so, in many cases, you’ll just have to acknowledge their potential impact and account for them in the conclusions you draw. Every study has its limitations , so don’t get fixated or discouraged by troublesome variables. Nevertheless, always think carefully about the factors beyond what you’re focusing on – don’t make assumptions!
As we mentioned, independent, dependent and control variables are the most common variables you’ll come across in your research, but they’re certainly not the only ones you need to be aware of. Next, we’ll look at a few “secondary” variables that you need to keep in mind as you design your research.
Let’s jump into it…
A moderating variable is a variable that influences the strength or direction of the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. In other words, moderating variables affect how much (or how little) the IV affects the DV, or whether the IV has a positive or negative relationship with the DV (i.e., moves in the same or opposite direction).
For example, in a study about the effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance, gender could be used as a moderating variable to see if there are any differences in how men and women respond to a lack of sleep. In such a case, one may find that gender has an influence on how much students’ scores suffer when they’re deprived of sleep.
It’s important to note that while moderators can have an influence on outcomes , they don’t necessarily cause them ; rather they modify or “moderate” existing relationships between other variables. This means that it’s possible for two different groups with similar characteristics, but different levels of moderation, to experience very different results from the same experiment or study design.
Mediating variables are often used to explain the relationship between the independent and dependent variable (s). For example, if you were researching the effects of age on job satisfaction, then education level could be considered a mediating variable, as it may explain why older people have higher job satisfaction than younger people – they may have more experience or better qualifications, which lead to greater job satisfaction.
Mediating variables also help researchers understand how different factors interact with each other to influence outcomes. For instance, if you wanted to study the effect of stress on academic performance, then coping strategies might act as a mediating factor by influencing both stress levels and academic performance simultaneously. For example, students who use effective coping strategies might be less stressed but also perform better academically due to their improved mental state.
In addition, mediating variables can provide insight into causal relationships between two variables by helping researchers determine whether changes in one factor directly cause changes in another – or whether there is an indirect relationship between them mediated by some third factor(s). For instance, if you wanted to investigate the impact of parental involvement on student achievement, you would need to consider family dynamics as a potential mediator, since it could influence both parental involvement and student achievement simultaneously.
A confounding variable (also known as a third variable or lurking variable ) is an extraneous factor that can influence the relationship between two variables being studied. Specifically, for a variable to be considered a confounding variable, it needs to meet two criteria:
Some common examples of confounding variables include demographic factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, education level, and health status. In addition to these, there are also environmental factors to consider. For example, air pollution could confound the impact of the variables of interest in a study investigating health outcomes.
Naturally, it’s important to identify as many confounding variables as possible when conducting your research, as they can heavily distort the results and lead you to draw incorrect conclusions . So, always think carefully about what factors may have a confounding effect on your variables of interest and try to manage these as best you can.
Latent variables are unobservable factors that can influence the behaviour of individuals and explain certain outcomes within a study. They’re also known as hidden or underlying variables , and what makes them rather tricky is that they can’t be directly observed or measured . Instead, latent variables must be inferred from other observable data points such as responses to surveys or experiments.
For example, in a study of mental health, the variable “resilience” could be considered a latent variable. It can’t be directly measured , but it can be inferred from measures of mental health symptoms, stress, and coping mechanisms. The same applies to a lot of concepts we encounter every day – for example:
One way in which we overcome the challenge of measuring the immeasurable is latent variable models (LVMs). An LVM is a type of statistical model that describes a relationship between observed variables and one or more unobserved (latent) variables. These models allow researchers to uncover patterns in their data which may not have been visible before, thanks to their complexity and interrelatedness with other variables. Those patterns can then inform hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships among those same variables which were previously unknown prior to running the LVM. Powerful stuff, we say!
In the world of scientific research, there’s no shortage of variable types, some of which have multiple names and some of which overlap with each other. In this post, we’ve covered some of the popular ones, but remember that this is not an exhaustive list .
To recap, we’ve explored:
If you’re still feeling a bit lost and need a helping hand with your research project, check out our 1-on-1 coaching service , where we guide you through each step of the research journey. Also, be sure to check out our free dissertation writing course and our collection of free, fully-editable chapter templates .
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Very informative, concise and helpful. Thank you
Helping information.Thanks
practical and well-demonstrated
Very helpful and insightful
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Methodology
Published on February 3, 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.
In research, variables are any characteristics that can take on different values, such as height, age, temperature, or test scores.
Researchers often manipulate or measure independent and dependent variables in studies to test cause-and-effect relationships.
Your independent variable is the temperature of the room. You vary the room temperature by making it cooler for half the participants, and warmer for the other half.
What is an independent variable, types of independent variables, what is a dependent variable, identifying independent vs. dependent variables, independent and dependent variables in research, visualizing independent and dependent variables, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about independent and dependent variables.
An independent variable is the variable you manipulate or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called “independent” because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.
Independent variables are also called:
These terms are especially used in statistics , where you estimate the extent to which an independent variable change can explain or predict changes in the dependent variable.
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example
There are two main types of independent variables.
In experiments, you manipulate independent variables directly to see how they affect your dependent variable. The independent variable is usually applied at different levels to see how the outcomes differ.
You can apply just two levels in order to find out if an independent variable has an effect at all.
You can also apply multiple levels to find out how the independent variable affects the dependent variable.
You have three independent variable levels, and each group gets a different level of treatment.
You randomly assign your patients to one of the three groups:
A true experiment requires you to randomly assign different levels of an independent variable to your participants.
Random assignment helps you control participant characteristics, so that they don’t affect your experimental results. This helps you to have confidence that your dependent variable results come solely from the independent variable manipulation.
Subject variables are characteristics that vary across participants, and they can’t be manipulated by researchers. For example, gender identity, ethnicity, race, income, and education are all important subject variables that social researchers treat as independent variables.
It’s not possible to randomly assign these to participants, since these are characteristics of already existing groups. Instead, you can create a research design where you compare the outcomes of groups of participants with characteristics. This is a quasi-experimental design because there’s no random assignment. Note that any research methods that use non-random assignment are at risk for research biases like selection bias and sampling bias .
Your independent variable is a subject variable, namely the gender identity of the participants. You have three groups: men, women and other.
Your dependent variable is the brain activity response to hearing infant cries. You record brain activity with fMRI scans when participants hear infant cries without their awareness.
A dependent variable is the variable that changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation. It’s the outcome you’re interested in measuring, and it “depends” on your independent variable.
In statistics , dependent variables are also called:
The dependent variable is what you record after you’ve manipulated the independent variable. You use this measurement data to check whether and to what extent your independent variable influences the dependent variable by conducting statistical analyses.
Based on your findings, you can estimate the degree to which your independent variable variation drives changes in your dependent variable. You can also predict how much your dependent variable will change as a result of variation in the independent variable.
Distinguishing between independent and dependent variables can be tricky when designing a complex study or reading an academic research paper .
A dependent variable from one study can be the independent variable in another study, so it’s important to pay attention to research design .
Here are some tips for identifying each variable type.
Use this list of questions to check whether you’re dealing with an independent variable:
Check whether you’re dealing with a dependent variable:
Independent and dependent variables are generally used in experimental and quasi-experimental research.
Here are some examples of research questions and corresponding independent and dependent variables.
Research question | Independent variable | Dependent variable(s) |
---|---|---|
Do tomatoes grow fastest under fluorescent, incandescent, or natural light? | ||
What is the effect of intermittent fasting on blood sugar levels? | ||
Is medical marijuana effective for pain reduction in people with chronic pain? | ||
To what extent does remote working increase job satisfaction? |
For experimental data, you analyze your results by generating descriptive statistics and visualizing your findings. Then, you select an appropriate statistical test to test your hypothesis .
The type of test is determined by:
You’ll often use t tests or ANOVAs to analyze your data and answer your research questions.
In quantitative research , it’s good practice to use charts or graphs to visualize the results of studies. Generally, the independent variable goes on the x -axis (horizontal) and the dependent variable on the y -axis (vertical).
The type of visualization you use depends on the variable types in your research questions:
To inspect your data, you place your independent variable of treatment level on the x -axis and the dependent variable of blood pressure on the y -axis.
You plot bars for each treatment group before and after the treatment to show the difference in blood pressure.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Research bias
An independent variable is the variable you manipulate, control, or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called “independent” because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.
A dependent variable is what changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation in experiments . It’s what you’re interested in measuring, and it “depends” on your independent variable.
In statistics, dependent variables are also called:
Determining cause and effect is one of the most important parts of scientific research. It’s essential to know which is the cause – the independent variable – and which is the effect – the dependent variable.
You want to find out how blood sugar levels are affected by drinking diet soda and regular soda, so you conduct an experiment .
No. The value of a dependent variable depends on an independent variable, so a variable cannot be both independent and dependent at the same time. It must be either the cause or the effect, not both!
Yes, but including more than one of either type requires multiple research questions .
For example, if you are interested in the effect of a diet on health, you can use multiple measures of health: blood sugar, blood pressure, weight, pulse, and many more. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question.
You could also choose to look at the effect of exercise levels as well as diet, or even the additional effect of the two combined. Each of these is a separate independent variable .
To ensure the internal validity of an experiment , you should only change one independent variable at a time.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). Independent vs. Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/independent-and-dependent-variables/
Other students also liked, guide to experimental design | overview, steps, & examples, explanatory and response variables | definitions & examples, confounding variables | definition, examples & controls, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
Have you ever wondered how scientists make discoveries and how researchers come to understand the world around us? A crucial tool in their kit is the concept of the independent variable, which helps them delve into the mysteries of science and everyday life.
An independent variable is a condition or factor that researchers manipulate to observe its effect on another variable, known as the dependent variable. In simpler terms, it’s like adjusting the dials and watching what happens! By changing the independent variable, scientists can see if and how it causes changes in what they are measuring or observing, helping them make connections and draw conclusions.
In this article, we’ll explore the fascinating world of independent variables, journey through their history, examine theories, and look at a variety of examples from different fields.
Once upon a time, in a world thirsty for understanding, people observed the stars, the seas, and everything in between, seeking to unlock the mysteries of the universe.
The story of the independent variable begins with a quest for knowledge, a journey taken by thinkers and tinkerers who wanted to explain the wonders and strangeness of the world.
The seeds of the idea of independent variables were sown by Sir Francis Galton , an English polymath, in the 19th century. Galton wore many hats—he was a psychologist, anthropologist, meteorologist, and a statistician!
It was his diverse interests that led him to explore the relationships between different factors and their effects. Galton was curious—how did one thing lead to another, and what could be learned from these connections?
As Galton delved into the world of statistical theories , the concept of independent variables started taking shape.
He was interested in understanding how characteristics, like height and intelligence, were passed down through generations.
Galton’s work laid the foundation for later thinkers to refine and expand the concept, turning it into an invaluable tool for scientific research.
After Galton’s pioneering work, the concept of the independent variable continued to evolve and grow. Scientists and researchers from various fields adopted and adapted it, finding new ways to use it to make sense of the world.
They discovered that by manipulating one factor (the independent variable), they could observe changes in another (the dependent variable), leading to groundbreaking insights and discoveries.
Through the years, the independent variable became a cornerstone in experimental design . Researchers in fields like physics, biology, psychology, and sociology used it to test hypotheses, develop theories, and uncover the laws that govern our universe.
The idea that originated from Galton’s curiosity had bloomed into a universal key, unlocking doors to knowledge across disciplines.
Today, the independent variable stands tall as a pillar of scientific research. It helps scientists and researchers ask critical questions, test their ideas, and find answers. Without independent variables, we wouldn’t have many of the advancements and understandings that we take for granted today.
The independent variable plays a starring role in experiments, helping us learn about everything from the smallest particles to the vastness of space. It helps researchers create vaccines, understand social behaviors, explore ecological systems, and even develop new technologies.
In the upcoming sections, we’ll dive deeper into what independent variables are, how they work, and how they’re used in various fields.
Together, we’ll uncover the magic of this scientific concept and see how it continues to shape our understanding of the world around us.
Embarking on the captivating journey of scientific exploration requires us to grasp the essential terms and ideas. It's akin to a treasure hunter mastering the use of a map and compass.
In our adventure through the realm of independent variables, we’ll delve deeper into some fundamental concepts and definitions to help us navigate this exciting world.
In the grand tapestry of research, variables are the gems that researchers seek. They’re elements, characteristics, or behaviors that can shift or vary in different circumstances.
Picture them as the myriad of ingredients in a chef’s kitchen—each variable can be adjusted or modified to create a myriad of dishes, each with a unique flavor!
Understanding variables is essential as they form the core of every scientific experiment and observational study.
Independent Variable The star of our story, the independent variable, is the one that researchers change or control to study its effects. It’s like a chef experimenting with different spices to see how each one alters the taste of the soup. The independent variable is the catalyst, the initial spark that sets the wheels of research in motion.
Dependent Variable The dependent variable is the outcome we observe and measure . It’s the altered flavor of the soup that results from the chef’s culinary experiments. This variable depends on the changes made to the independent variable, hence the name!
Observing how the dependent variable reacts to changes helps scientists draw conclusions and make discoveries.
Control Variable Control variables are the unsung heroes of scientific research. They’re the constants, the elements that researchers keep the same to ensure the integrity of the experiment.
Imagine if our chef used a different type of broth each time he experimented with spices—the results would be all over the place! Control variables keep the experiment grounded and help researchers be confident in their findings.
Confounding Variables Imagine a hidden rock in a stream, changing the water’s flow in unexpected ways. Confounding variables are similar—they are external factors that can sneak into experiments and influence the outcome , adding twists to our scientific story.
These variables can blur the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, making the results of the study a bit puzzly. Detecting and controlling these hidden elements helps researchers ensure the accuracy of their findings and reach true conclusions.
There are of course other types of variables, and different ways to manipulate them called " schedules of reinforcement ," but we won't get into that too much here.
Manipulation When researchers manipulate the independent variable, they are orchestrating a symphony of cause and effect. They’re adjusting the strings, the brass, the percussion, observing how each change influences the melody—the dependent variable.
This manipulation is at the heart of experimental research. It allows scientists to explore relationships, unravel patterns, and unearth the secrets hidden within the fabric of our universe.
Observation With every tweak and adjustment made to the independent variable, researchers are like seasoned detectives, observing the dependent variable for changes, collecting clues, and piecing together the puzzle.
Observing the effects and changes that occur helps them deduce relationships, formulate theories, and expand our understanding of the world. Every observation is a step towards solving the mysteries of nature and human behavior.
Characteristics Identifying an independent variable in the vast landscape of research can seem daunting, but fear not! Independent variables have distinctive characteristics that make them stand out.
They’re the elements that are deliberately changed or controlled in an experiment to study their effects on the dependent variable. Recognizing these characteristics is like learning to spot footprints in the sand—it leads us to the heart of the discovery!
In Different Types of Research The world of research is diverse and varied, and the independent variable dons many guises! In the field of medicine, it might manifest as the dosage of a drug administered to patients.
In psychology, it could take the form of different learning methods applied to study memory retention. In each field, identifying the independent variable correctly is the golden key that unlocks the treasure trove of knowledge and insights.
As we forge ahead on our enlightening journey, equipped with a deeper understanding of independent variables and their roles, we’re ready to delve into the intricate theories and diverse examples that underscore their significance.
Now that we’re acquainted with the basic concepts and have the tools to identify independent variables, let’s dive into the fascinating ocean of theories and frameworks.
These theories are like ancient scrolls, providing guidelines and blueprints that help scientists use independent variables to uncover the secrets of the universe.
What is it and How Does it Work? The scientific method is like a super-helpful treasure map that scientists use to make discoveries. It has steps we follow: asking a question, researching, guessing what will happen (that's a hypothesis!), experimenting, checking the results, figuring out what they mean, and telling everyone about it.
Our hero, the independent variable, is the compass that helps this adventure go the right way!
How Independent Variables Lead the Way In the scientific method, the independent variable is like the captain of a ship, leading everyone through unknown waters.
Scientists change this variable to see what happens and to learn new things. It’s like having a compass that points us towards uncharted lands full of knowledge!
The Basics of Building Constructing an experiment is like building a castle, and the independent variable is the cornerstone. It’s carefully chosen and manipulated to see how it affects the dependent variable. Researchers also identify control and confounding variables, ensuring the castle stands strong, and the results are reliable.
Keeping Everything in Check In every experiment, maintaining control is key to finding the treasure. Scientists use control variables to keep the conditions consistent, ensuring that any changes observed are truly due to the independent variable. It’s like ensuring the castle’s foundation is solid, supporting the structure as it reaches for the sky.
Making Educated Guesses Before they start experimenting, scientists make educated guesses called hypotheses . It’s like predicting which X marks the spot of the treasure! It often includes the independent variable and the expected effect on the dependent variable, guiding researchers as they navigate through the experiment.
Independent Variables in the Spotlight When testing these guesses, the independent variable is the star of the show! Scientists change and watch this variable to see if their guesses were right. It helps them figure out new stuff and learn more about the world around us!
Figuring Out Relationships After the experimenting is done, it’s time for scientists to crack the code! They use statistics to understand how the independent and dependent variables are related and to uncover the hidden stories in the data.
Experimenters have to be careful about how they determine the validity of their findings, which is why they use statistics. Something called "experimenter bias" can get in the way of having true (valid) results, because it's basically when the experimenter influences the outcome based on what they believe to be true (or what they want to be true!).
How Important are the Discoveries? Through statistical analysis, scientists determine the significance of their findings. It’s like discovering if the treasure found is made of gold or just shiny rocks. The analysis helps researchers know if the independent variable truly had an effect, contributing to the rich tapestry of scientific knowledge.
As we uncover more about how theories and frameworks use independent variables, we start to see how awesome they are in helping us learn more about the world. But we’re not done yet!
Up next, we’ll look at tons of examples to see how independent variables work their magic in different areas.
Independent variables take on many forms, showcasing their versatility in a range of experiments and studies. Let’s uncover how they act as the protagonists in numerous investigations and learning quests!
1) plant growth.
Consider an experiment aiming to observe the effect of varying water amounts on plant height. In this scenario, the amount of water given to the plants is the independent variable!
Suppose we are curious about the time it takes for water to freeze at different temperatures. The temperature of the freezer becomes the independent variable as we adjust it to observe the results!
Have you ever observed how shadows change? In an experiment, adjusting the light angle to observe its effect on an object’s shadow makes the angle of light the independent variable!
In medical studies, determining how varying medicine dosages influence a patient’s recovery is essential. Here, the dosage of the medicine administered is the independent variable!
Researchers might examine the impact of different exercise forms on individuals’ health. The various exercise forms constitute the independent variable in this study!
Have you pondered how the sleep duration affects your well-being the following day? In such research, the hours of sleep serve as the independent variable!
Psychologists might investigate how diverse study methods influence test outcomes. Here, the different study methods adopted by students are the independent variable!
Have you experienced varied emotions with different music genres? The genre of music played becomes the independent variable when researching its influence on emotions!
Suppose researchers are exploring how room colors affect individuals’ emotions. In this case, the room colors act as the independent variable!
10) rainfall and plant life.
Environmental scientists may study the influence of varying rainfall levels on vegetation. In this instance, the amount of rainfall is the independent variable!
Examining how temperature variations affect animal behavior is fascinating. Here, the varying temperatures serve as the independent variable!
Investigating the effects of different pollution levels on air quality is crucial. In such studies, the pollution level is the independent variable!
Researchers might explore how varying internet speeds impact work productivity. In this exploration, the internet speed is the independent variable!
Examining how different devices affect user experience is interesting. Here, the type of device used is the independent variable!
Suppose a study aims to determine how different software versions influence system performance. The software version becomes the independent variable!
Educators might investigate the effect of varied teaching styles on student engagement. In such a study, the teaching style is the independent variable!
Researchers could explore how different class sizes influence students’ learning. Here, the class size is the independent variable!
Examining the relationship between the frequency of homework assignments and academic success is essential. The frequency of homework becomes the independent variable!
Astronomers might study how different telescopes affect celestial observation. In this scenario, the telescope type is the independent variable!
Investigating the influence of varying light pollution levels on star visibility is intriguing. Here, the level of light pollution is the independent variable!
Suppose a study explores how observation duration affects the detail captured in astronomical images. The duration of observation serves as the independent variable!
Sociologists may examine how the size of a community influences social interactions. In this research, the community size is the independent variable!
Investigating the effect of diverse cultural exposure on social tolerance is vital. Here, the level of cultural exposure is the independent variable!
Researchers could explore how different economic statuses impact educational achievements. In such studies, economic status is the independent variable!
Sports scientists might study how varying training intensities affect athletes’ performance. In this case, the training intensity is the independent variable!
Examining the relationship between different sports equipment and player safety is crucial. Here, the type of equipment used is the independent variable!
Suppose researchers are investigating how the size of a sports team influences game strategy. The team size becomes the independent variable!
Nutritionists may explore the impact of various diets on individuals’ health. In this exploration, the type of diet followed is the independent variable!
Investigating how different caloric intakes influence weight change is essential. In such a study, the caloric intake is the independent variable!
Researchers could examine how consuming a variety of foods affects nutrient absorption. Here, the variety of foods consumed is the independent variable!
Isn't it fantastic how independent variables play such an essential part in so many studies? But the excitement doesn't stop there!
Now, let’s explore how findings from these studies, led by independent variables, make a big splash in the real world and improve our daily lives!
31) treatment optimization.
By studying different medicine dosages and treatment methods as independent variables, doctors can figure out the best ways to help patients recover quicker and feel better. This leads to more effective medicines and treatment plans!
Researching the effects of sleep, exercise, and diet helps health experts give us advice on living healthier lives. By changing these independent variables, scientists uncover the secrets to feeling good and staying well!
33) speeding up the internet.
When scientists explore how different internet speeds affect our online activities, they’re able to develop technologies to make the internet faster and more reliable. This means smoother video calls and quicker downloads!
By examining how we interact with various devices and software, researchers can design technology that’s easier and more enjoyable to use. This leads to cooler gadgets and more user-friendly apps!
35) enhancing learning.
Investigating different teaching styles, class sizes, and study methods helps educators discover what makes learning fun and effective. This research shapes classrooms, teaching methods, and even homework!
By studying how students with diverse needs respond to different support strategies, educators can create personalized learning experiences. This means every student gets the help they need to succeed!
37) conserving nature.
Researching how rainfall, temperature, and pollution affect the environment helps scientists suggest ways to protect our planet. By studying these independent variables, we learn how to keep nature healthy and thriving!
Scientists studying the effects of pollution and human activities on climate change are leading the way in finding solutions. By exploring these independent variables, we can develop strategies to combat climate change and protect the Earth!
39) building stronger communities.
Sociologists studying community size, cultural exposure, and economic status help us understand what makes communities happy and united. This knowledge guides the development of policies and programs for stronger societies!
By exploring how exposure to diverse cultures affects social tolerance, researchers contribute to fostering more inclusive and harmonious societies. This helps build a world where everyone is respected and valued!
41) optimizing athlete training.
Sports scientists studying training intensity, equipment type, and team size help athletes reach their full potential. This research leads to better training programs, safer equipment, and more exciting games!
By investigating how different game strategies are influenced by various team compositions, researchers contribute to the evolution of sports. This means more thrilling competitions and matches for us to enjoy!
43) guiding healthy eating.
Nutritionists researching diet types, caloric intake, and food variety help us understand what foods are best for our bodies. This knowledge shapes dietary guidelines and helps us make tasty, yet nutritious, meal choices!
By studying the effects of different nutrients and diets, researchers educate us on maintaining a balanced diet. This fosters a greater awareness of nutritional well-being and encourages healthier eating habits!
As we journey through these real-world applications, we witness the incredible impact of studies featuring independent variables. The exploration doesn’t end here, though!
Let’s continue our adventure and see how we can identify independent variables in our own observations and inquiries! Keep your curiosity alive, and let’s delve deeper into the exciting realm of independent variables!
So, we’ve seen how independent variables star in many studies, but how about spotting them in our everyday life?
Recognizing independent variables can be like a treasure hunt – you never know where you might find one! Let’s uncover some tips and tricks to identify these hidden gems in various situations.
One of the best ways to spot an independent variable is by asking questions! If you’re curious about something, ask yourself, “What am I changing or manipulating in this situation?” The thing you’re changing is likely the independent variable!
For example, if you’re wondering whether the amount of sunlight affects how quickly your laundry dries, the sunlight amount is your independent variable!
Keep your eyes peeled and observe the world around you! By watching how changes in one thing (like the amount of rain) affect something else (like the height of grass), you can identify the independent variable.
In this case, the amount of rain is the independent variable because it’s what’s changing!
Get hands-on and conduct your own experiments! By changing one thing and observing the results, you’re identifying the independent variable.
If you’re growing plants and decide to water each one differently to see the effects, the amount of water is your independent variable!
In everyday scenarios, independent variables are all around!
When you adjust the temperature of your oven to bake cookies, the oven temperature is the independent variable.
Or if you’re deciding how much time to spend studying for a test, the study time is your independent variable!
Keep being curious and asking “What if?” questions! By exploring different possibilities and wondering how changing one thing could affect another, you’re on your way to identifying independent variables.
If you’re curious about how the color of a room affects your mood, the room color is the independent variable!
Don’t forget about the treasure trove of past studies and experiments! By reviewing what scientists and researchers have done before, you can learn how they identified independent variables in their work.
This can give you ideas and help you recognize independent variables in your own explorations!
Ready for some practice? Let’s put on our thinking caps and try to identify the independent variables in a few scenarios.
Remember, the independent variable is what’s being changed or manipulated to observe the effect on something else! (You can see the answers below)
You’re cooking pasta for dinner and want to find out how the cooking time affects its texture. What is the independent variable?
You decide to try different exercise routines each week to see which one makes you feel the most energetic. What is the independent variable?
You’re growing tomatoes in your garden and decide to use different types of fertilizer to see which one helps them grow the best. What is the independent variable?
You’re preparing for an important test and try studying in different environments (quiet room, coffee shop, library) to see where you concentrate best. What is the independent variable?
You’re curious to see how the number of hours you sleep each night affects your mood the next day. What is the independent variable?
By practicing identifying independent variables in different scenarios, you’re becoming a true independent variable detective. Keep practicing, stay curious, and you’ll soon be spotting independent variables everywhere you go.
Independent Variable: The cooking time is the independent variable. You are changing the cooking time to observe its effect on the texture of the pasta.
Independent Variable: The type of exercise routine is the independent variable. You are trying out different exercise routines each week to see which one makes you feel the most energetic.
Independent Variable: The type of fertilizer is the independent variable. You are using different types of fertilizer to observe their effects on the growth of the tomatoes.
Independent Variable: The study environment is the independent variable. You are studying in different environments to see where you concentrate best.
Independent Variable: The number of hours you sleep is the independent variable. You are changing your sleep duration to see how it affects your mood the next day.
Whew, what a journey we’ve had exploring the world of independent variables! From understanding their definition and role to diving into a myriad of examples and real-world impacts, we’ve uncovered the treasures hidden in the realm of independent variables.
The beauty of independent variables lies in their ability to unlock new knowledge and insights, guiding us to discoveries that improve our lives and the world around us.
By identifying and studying these variables, we embark on exciting learning adventures, solving mysteries and answering questions about the universe we live in.
Remember, the joy of discovery doesn’t end here. The world is brimming with questions waiting to be answered and mysteries waiting to be solved.
Keep your curiosity alive, continue exploring, and who knows what incredible discoveries lie ahead.
Reference this article:
PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Follow Us On:
Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter
Developmental
Personality
Relationships
Psychologists
Serial Killers
Personality Quiz
Memory Test
Depression test
Type A/B Personality Test
© PracticalPsychology. All rights reserved
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Table of Contents
Have you ever wondered how psychologists manage to uncover the mysteries of human behavior and the mind? It’s not by chance, but through carefully designed experiments that reveal how one aspect of our environment or psychology can influence another. At the heart of these experiments are two critical concepts: independent and dependent variable s. Understanding these concepts is like having a backstage pass to the scientific process in psychological research, showing you exactly how the magic happens.
In the realm of psychological research, every experiment aims to understand the relationship between two key elements: the cause and the effect. The independent variable , often termed the IV, is the presumed cause. It’s the factor that researchers manipulate to observe the outcome it produces. Think of it as the experimental lever that scientists pull to initiate a reaction. On the flip side, the dependent variable, or DV, is the effect or outcome that is being measured. It’s dependent because its changes rely on the alterations made to the independent variable.
Imagine a stage where a psychological experiment is a play. The independent variable is the director, making deliberate changes to the scene, while the dependent variable is the actor, whose performance is influenced by the director’s choices. For instance, a psychologist might want to understand if sleep quality affects memory performance. Here, the independent variable could be the number of hours slept, and the dependent variable would be the score on a memory test.
To say that one thing causes another in psychology isn’t a statement made lightly. Establishing a cause-and-effect relationship is the Holy Grail of experimental research. By manipulating the independent variable and observing the change in the dependent variable, psychologists can infer causality. However, it’s crucial to rule out other variables that could influence the outcome, known as confounding variables . This is why most experiments also include control groups that do not receive the experimental manipulation , ensuring that the results can be attributed to the changes in the independent variable.
Let’s walk through a few examples to see how independent and dependent variables play out in real psychological experiments:
Designing an experiment around independent and dependent variables is an art and a science. Researchers must carefully consider how to manipulate the IV without introducing bias or additional variables that could skew the results. They also need to think critically about how they’ll measure the DV, ensuring that their methods are both reliable and valid. To achieve this, they may use various tools, such as standardized tests, surveys, physiological measurement s, or observational techniques.
Even the most seasoned researchers can encounter challenges when working with independent and dependent variables. Here are some common pitfalls and strategies for avoiding them:
These are variables that could inadvertently influence the dependent variable. To avoid this, researchers use random assignment to groups, which helps ensure that each group is similar in all respects except for the manipulation of the independent variable.
Without clear definitions of what is being measured and manipulated, experiments can become vague and unreliable. Researchers must operationally define their variables in concrete, measurable terms.
Ensuring that the tools used to measure the dependent variable are consistent (reliable) and actually measure what they’re supposed to measure (valid) is crucial for the integrity of the experiment.
Independent and dependent variables are the yin and yang of experimental psychology. They work together to reveal the underlying mechanisms of human thought, emotion, and behavior. By understanding and controlling these variables, researchers can uncover truths about the human condition that would otherwise remain hidden.
What do you think? How might understanding these variables change the way you view psychological studies in the media? Can you think of any other examples in your daily life where independent and dependent variables come into play?
How useful was this post?
Click on a star to rate it!
Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Submit Comment
1 Introduction to Psychological Research – Objectives and Goals, Problems, Hypothesis and Variables
2 Introduction to Psychological Experiments and Tests
3 Steps in Research
4 Types of Research and Methods of Research
5 Definition and Description Research Design, Quality of Research Design
6 Experimental Design (Control Group Design and Two Factor Design)
7 Survey Design
8 Single Subject Design
9 Observation Method
10 Interview and Interviewing
11 Questionnaire Method
12 Case Study
13 Report Writing
14 Review of Literature
15 Methodology
16 Result, Analysis and Discussion of the Data
17 Summary and Conclusion
18 References in Research Report
Saul Mcleod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
Research methods in psychology are systematic procedures used to observe, describe, predict, and explain behavior and mental processes. They include experiments, surveys, case studies, and naturalistic observations, ensuring data collection is objective and reliable to understand and explain psychological phenomena.
Hypotheses are statements about the prediction of the results, that can be verified or disproved by some investigation.
There are four types of hypotheses :
All research has an alternative hypothesis (either a one-tailed or two-tailed) and a corresponding null hypothesis.
Once the research is conducted and results are found, psychologists must accept one hypothesis and reject the other.
So, if a difference is found, the Psychologist would accept the alternative hypothesis and reject the null. The opposite applies if no difference is found.
Sampling techniques
Sampling is the process of selecting a representative group from the population under study.
A sample is the participants you select from a target population (the group you are interested in) to make generalizations about.
Representative means the extent to which a sample mirrors a researcher’s target population and reflects its characteristics.
Generalisability means the extent to which their findings can be applied to the larger population of which their sample was a part.
Experiments always have an independent and dependent variable .
Operationalization of variables means making them measurable/quantifiable. We must use operationalization to ensure that variables are in a form that can be easily tested.
For instance, we can’t really measure ‘happiness’, but we can measure how many times a person smiles within a two-hour period.
By operationalizing variables, we make it easy for someone else to replicate our research. Remember, this is important because we can check if our findings are reliable.
Extraneous variables are all variables which are not independent variable but could affect the results of the experiment.
It can be a natural characteristic of the participant, such as intelligence levels, gender, or age for example, or it could be a situational feature of the environment such as lighting or noise.
Demand characteristics are a type of extraneous variable that occurs if the participants work out the aims of the research study, they may begin to behave in a certain way.
For example, in Milgram’s research , critics argued that participants worked out that the shocks were not real and they administered them as they thought this was what was required of them.
Extraneous variables must be controlled so that they do not affect (confound) the results.
Randomly allocating participants to their conditions or using a matched pairs experimental design can help to reduce participant variables.
Situational variables are controlled by using standardized procedures, ensuring every participant in a given condition is treated in the same way
Experimental design refers to how participants are allocated to each condition of the independent variable, such as a control or experimental group.
If we wish to compare two groups with respect to a given independent variable, it is essential to make sure that the two groups do not differ in any other important way.
All experimental methods involve an iv (independent variable) and dv (dependent variable)..
Case studies are in-depth investigations of a person, group, event, or community. It uses information from a range of sources, such as from the person concerned and also from their family and friends.
Many techniques may be used such as interviews, psychological tests, observations and experiments. Case studies are generally longitudinal: in other words, they follow the individual or group over an extended period of time.
Case studies are widely used in psychology and among the best-known ones carried out were by Sigmund Freud . He conducted very detailed investigations into the private lives of his patients in an attempt to both understand and help them overcome their illnesses.
Case studies provide rich qualitative data and have high levels of ecological validity. However, it is difficult to generalize from individual cases as each one has unique characteristics.
Correlation means association; it is a measure of the extent to which two variables are related. One of the variables can be regarded as the predictor variable with the other one as the outcome variable.
Correlational studies typically involve obtaining two different measures from a group of participants, and then assessing the degree of association between the measures.
The predictor variable can be seen as occurring before the outcome variable in some sense. It is called the predictor variable, because it forms the basis for predicting the value of the outcome variable.
Relationships between variables can be displayed on a graph or as a numerical score called a correlation coefficient.
After looking at the scattergraph, if we want to be sure that a significant relationship does exist between the two variables, a statistical test of correlation can be conducted, such as Spearman’s rho.
The test will give us a score, called a correlation coefficient . This is a value between 0 and 1, and the closer to 1 the score is, the stronger the relationship between the variables. This value can be both positive e.g. 0.63, or negative -0.63.
Correlation does not always prove causation, as a third variable may be involved.
Interviews are commonly divided into two types: structured and unstructured.
A fixed, predetermined set of questions is put to every participant in the same order and in the same way.
Responses are recorded on a questionnaire, and the researcher presets the order and wording of questions, and sometimes the range of alternative answers.
The interviewer stays within their role and maintains social distance from the interviewee.
There are no set questions, and the participant can raise whatever topics he/she feels are relevant and ask them in their own way. Questions are posed about participants’ answers to the subject
Unstructured interviews are most useful in qualitative research to analyze attitudes and values.
Though they rarely provide a valid basis for generalization, their main advantage is that they enable the researcher to probe social actors’ subjective point of view.
Questionnaire Method
Questionnaires can be thought of as a kind of written interview. They can be carried out face to face, by telephone, or post.
The choice of questions is important because of the need to avoid bias or ambiguity in the questions, ‘leading’ the respondent or causing offense.
Its other practical advantages are that it is cheaper than face-to-face interviews and can be used to contact many respondents scattered over a wide area relatively quickly.
There are different types of observation methods :
A pilot study is a small scale preliminary study conducted in order to evaluate the feasibility of the key s teps in a future, full-scale project.
A pilot study is an initial run-through of the procedures to be used in an investigation; it involves selecting a few people and trying out the study on them. It is possible to save time, and in some cases, money, by identifying any flaws in the procedures designed by the researcher.
A pilot study can help the researcher spot any ambiguities (i.e. unusual things) or confusion in the information given to participants or problems with the task devised.
Sometimes the task is too hard, and the researcher may get a floor effect, because none of the participants can score at all or can complete the task – all performances are low.
The opposite effect is a ceiling effect, when the task is so easy that all achieve virtually full marks or top performances and are “hitting the ceiling”.
In cross-sectional research , a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time
Sometimes, we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time.
In cohort studies , the participants must share a common factor or characteristic such as age, demographic, or occupation. A cohort study is a type of longitudinal study in which researchers monitor and observe a chosen population over an extended period.
Triangulation means using more than one research method to improve the study’s validity.
Reliability is a measure of consistency, if a particular measurement is repeated and the same result is obtained then it is described as being reliable.
A meta-analysis is a systematic review that involves identifying an aim and then searching for research studies that have addressed similar aims/hypotheses.
This is done by looking through various databases, and then decisions are made about what studies are to be included/excluded.
Strengths: Increases the conclusions’ validity as they’re based on a wider range.
Weaknesses: Research designs in studies can vary, so they are not truly comparable.
A researcher submits an article to a journal. The choice of the journal may be determined by the journal’s audience or prestige.
The journal selects two or more appropriate experts (psychologists working in a similar field) to peer review the article without payment. The peer reviewers assess: the methods and designs used, originality of the findings, the validity of the original research findings and its content, structure and language.
Feedback from the reviewer determines whether the article is accepted. The article may be: Accepted as it is, accepted with revisions, sent back to the author to revise and re-submit or rejected without the possibility of submission.
The editor makes the final decision whether to accept or reject the research report based on the reviewers comments/ recommendations.
Peer review is important because it prevent faulty data from entering the public domain, it provides a way of checking the validity of findings and the quality of the methodology and is used to assess the research rating of university departments.
Peer reviews may be an ideal, whereas in practice there are lots of problems. For example, it slows publication down and may prevent unusual, new work being published. Some reviewers might use it as an opportunity to prevent competing researchers from publishing work.
Some people doubt whether peer review can really prevent the publication of fraudulent research.
The advent of the internet means that a lot of research and academic comment is being published without official peer reviews than before, though systems are evolving on the internet where everyone really has a chance to offer their opinions and police the quality of research.
Validity means how well a piece of research actually measures what it sets out to, or how well it reflects the reality it claims to represent.
Validity is whether the observed effect is genuine and represents what is actually out there in the world.
A significant result is one where there is a low probability that chance factors were responsible for any observed difference, correlation, or association in the variables tested.
If our test is significant, we can reject our null hypothesis and accept our alternative hypothesis.
If our test is not significant, we can accept our null hypothesis and reject our alternative hypothesis. A null hypothesis is a statement of no effect.
In Psychology, we use p < 0.05 (as it strikes a balance between making a type I and II error) but p < 0.01 is used in tests that could cause harm like introducing a new drug.
A type I error is when the null hypothesis is rejected when it should have been accepted (happens when a lenient significance level is used, an error of optimism).
A type II error is when the null hypothesis is accepted when it should have been rejected (happens when a stringent significance level is used, an error of pessimism).
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
Published on 4 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on 17 October 2022.
In research, variables are any characteristics that can take on different values, such as height, age, temperature, or test scores.
Researchers often manipulate or measure independent and dependent variables in studies to test cause-and-effect relationships.
Your independent variable is the temperature of the room. You vary the room temperature by making it cooler for half the participants, and warmer for the other half.
What is an independent variable, types of independent variables, what is a dependent variable, identifying independent vs dependent variables, independent and dependent variables in research, visualising independent and dependent variables, frequently asked questions about independent and dependent variables.
An independent variable is the variable you manipulate or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called ‘independent’ because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.
Independent variables are also called:
These terms are especially used in statistics , where you estimate the extent to which an independent variable change can explain or predict changes in the dependent variable.
There are two main types of independent variables.
In experiments, you manipulate independent variables directly to see how they affect your dependent variable. The independent variable is usually applied at different levels to see how the outcomes differ.
You can apply just two levels in order to find out if an independent variable has an effect at all.
You can also apply multiple levels to find out how the independent variable affects the dependent variable.
You have three independent variable levels, and each group gets a different level of treatment.
You randomly assign your patients to one of the three groups:
A true experiment requires you to randomly assign different levels of an independent variable to your participants.
Random assignment helps you control participant characteristics, so that they don’t affect your experimental results. This helps you to have confidence that your dependent variable results come solely from the independent variable manipulation.
Subject variables are characteristics that vary across participants, and they can’t be manipulated by researchers. For example, gender identity, ethnicity, race, income, and education are all important subject variables that social researchers treat as independent variables.
It’s not possible to randomly assign these to participants, since these are characteristics of already existing groups. Instead, you can create a research design where you compare the outcomes of groups of participants with characteristics. This is a quasi-experimental design because there’s no random assignment.
Your independent variable is a subject variable, namely the gender identity of the participants. You have three groups: men, women, and other.
Your dependent variable is the brain activity response to hearing infant cries. You record brain activity with fMRI scans when participants hear infant cries without their awareness.
A dependent variable is the variable that changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation. It’s the outcome you’re interested in measuring, and it ‘depends’ on your independent variable.
In statistics , dependent variables are also called:
The dependent variable is what you record after you’ve manipulated the independent variable. You use this measurement data to check whether and to what extent your independent variable influences the dependent variable by conducting statistical analyses.
Based on your findings, you can estimate the degree to which your independent variable variation drives changes in your dependent variable. You can also predict how much your dependent variable will change as a result of variation in the independent variable.
Distinguishing between independent and dependent variables can be tricky when designing a complex study or reading an academic paper.
A dependent variable from one study can be the independent variable in another study, so it’s important to pay attention to research design.
Here are some tips for identifying each variable type.
Use this list of questions to check whether you’re dealing with an independent variable:
Check whether you’re dealing with a dependent variable:
Independent and dependent variables are generally used in experimental and quasi-experimental research.
Here are some examples of research questions and corresponding independent and dependent variables.
Research question | Independent variable | Dependent variable(s) |
---|---|---|
Do tomatoes grow fastest under fluorescent, incandescent, or natural light? | ||
What is the effect of intermittent fasting on blood sugar levels? | ||
Is medical marijuana effective for pain reduction in people with chronic pain? | ||
To what extent does remote working increase job satisfaction? |
For experimental data, you analyse your results by generating descriptive statistics and visualising your findings. Then, you select an appropriate statistical test to test your hypothesis .
The type of test is determined by:
You’ll often use t tests or ANOVAs to analyse your data and answer your research questions.
In quantitative research , it’s good practice to use charts or graphs to visualise the results of studies. Generally, the independent variable goes on the x -axis (horizontal) and the dependent variable on the y -axis (vertical).
The type of visualisation you use depends on the variable types in your research questions:
To inspect your data, you place your independent variable of treatment level on the x -axis and the dependent variable of blood pressure on the y -axis.
You plot bars for each treatment group before and after the treatment to show the difference in blood pressure.
An independent variable is the variable you manipulate, control, or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called ‘independent’ because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.
A dependent variable is what changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation in experiments . It’s what you’re interested in measuring, and it ‘depends’ on your independent variable.
In statistics, dependent variables are also called:
Determining cause and effect is one of the most important parts of scientific research. It’s essential to know which is the cause – the independent variable – and which is the effect – the dependent variable.
You want to find out how blood sugar levels are affected by drinking diet cola and regular cola, so you conduct an experiment .
Yes, but including more than one of either type requires multiple research questions .
For example, if you are interested in the effect of a diet on health, you can use multiple measures of health: blood sugar, blood pressure, weight, pulse, and many more. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question.
You could also choose to look at the effect of exercise levels as well as diet, or even the additional effect of the two combined. Each of these is a separate independent variable .
To ensure the internal validity of an experiment , you should only change one independent variable at a time.
No. The value of a dependent variable depends on an independent variable, so a variable cannot be both independent and dependent at the same time. It must be either the cause or the effect, not both.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2022, October 17). Independent vs Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 2 July 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/independent-vs-dependent-variables/
Other students also liked, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples, quasi-experimental design | definition, types & examples, types of variables in research | definitions & examples.
Dave Cornell (PhD)
Dr. Cornell has worked in education for more than 20 years. His work has involved designing teacher certification for Trinity College in London and in-service training for state governments in the United States. He has trained kindergarten teachers in 8 countries and helped businessmen and women open baby centers and kindergartens in 3 countries.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Chris Drew (PhD)
This article was peer-reviewed and edited by Chris Drew (PhD). The review process on Helpful Professor involves having a PhD level expert fact check, edit, and contribute to articles. Reviewers ensure all content reflects expert academic consensus and is backed up with reference to academic studies. Dr. Drew has published over 20 academic articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education and holds a PhD in Education from ACU.
An independent variable (IV) is what is manipulated in a scientific experiment to determine its effect on the dependent variable (DV).
By varying the level of the independent variable and observing associated changes in the dependent variable, a researcher can conclude whether the independent variable affects the dependent variable or not.
This can provide very valuable information when studying just about any subject.
Because the researcher controls the level of the independent variable, it can be determined if the independent variable has a causal effect on the dependent variable.
The term causation is vitally important. Scientists want to know what causes changes in the dependent variable. The only way to do that is to manipulate the independent variable and observe any changes in the dependent variable.
The independent variable and dependent variable are used in a very specific type of scientific study called the experiment .
Although there are many variations of the experiment, generally speaking, it involves either the presence or absence of the independent variable and the observation of what happens to the dependent variable.
The research participants are randomly assigned to either receive the independent variable (called the treatment condition), or not receive the independent variable (called the control condition).
Other variations of an experiment might include having multiple levels of the independent variable.
If the independent variable affects the dependent variable, then it should be possible to observe changes in the dependent variable based on the presence or absence of the independent variable.
Of course, there are a lot of issues to consider when conducting an experiment, but these are the basic principles.
These concepts should not be confused with predictor and outcome variables .
1. gatorade and improved athletic performance.
A sports medicine researcher has been hired by Gatorade to test the effects of its sports drink on athletic performance. The company wants to claim that when an athlete drinks Gatorade, their performance will improve.
If they can back up that claim with hard scientific data, that would be great for sales.
So, the researcher goes to a nearby university and randomly selects both male and female athletes from several sports: track and field, volleyball, basketball, and football. Each athlete will run on a treadmill for one hour while their heart rate is tracked.
All of the athletes are given the exact same amount of liquid to consume 30-minutes before and during their run. Half are given Gatorade, and the other half are given water, but no one knows what they are given because both liquids have been colored.
In this example, the independent variable is Gatorade, and the dependent variable is heart rate.
A hospital is investigating the effectiveness of a new type of chemotherapy on cancer. The researchers identified 120 patients with relatively similar types of cancerous tumors in both size and stage of progression.
The patients are randomly assigned to one of three groups: one group receives no chemotherapy, one group receives a low dose of chemotherapy, and one group receives a high dose of chemotherapy.
Each group receives chemotherapy treatment three times a week for two months, except for the no-treatment group. At the end of two months, the doctors measure the size of each patient’s tumor.
In this study, despite the ethical issues (remember this is just a hypothetical example), the independent variable is chemotherapy, and the dependent variable is tumor size.
A well-known fast-food corporation wants to know if the color of the interior of their restaurants will affect how fast people eat. Of course, they would prefer that consumers enter and exit quickly to increase sales volume and profit.
So, they rent space in a large shopping mall and create three different simulated restaurant interiors of different colors. One room is painted mostly white with red trim and seats; one room is painted mostly white with blue trim and seats; and one room is painted mostly white with off-white trim and seats.
Next, they randomly select shoppers on Saturdays and Sundays to eat for free in one of the three rooms. Each shopper is given a box of the same food and drink items and sent to one of the rooms. The researchers record how much time elapses from the moment they enter the room to the moment they leave.
The independent variable is the color of the room, and the dependent variable is the amount of time spent in the room eating.
A large multinational cosmetics company wants to know if the color of a woman’s hair affects the level of perceived attractiveness in males. So, they use Photoshop to manipulate the same image of a female by altering the color of her hair: blonde, brunette, red, and brown.
Next, they randomly select university males to enter their testing facilities. Each participant sits in front of a computer screen and responds to questions on a survey. At the end of the survey, the screen shows one of the photos of the female.
At the same time, software on the computer that utilizes the computer’s camera is measuring each male’s pupil dilation. The researchers believe that larger dilation indicates greater perceived attractiveness.
The independent variable is hair color, and the dependent variable is pupil dilation.
After many claims that listening to Mozart will make you smarter, a group of education specialists decides to put it to the test. So, first, they go to a nearby school in a middle-class neighborhood.
During the first three months of the academic year, they randomly select some 5th-grade classrooms to listen to Mozart during their lessons and exams. Other 5 th grade classrooms will not listen to any music during their lessons and exams.
The researchers then compare the scores of the exams between the two groups of classrooms.
Although there are a lot of obvious limitations to this hypothetical, it is the first step.
The independent variable is Mozart, and the dependent variable is exam scores.
A company that specializes in essential oils wants to examine the effects of lavender on sleep quality. They hire a sleep research lab to conduct the study. The researchers at the lab have their usual test volunteers sleep in individual rooms every night for one week.
The conditions of each room are all exactly the same, except that half of the rooms have lavender released into the rooms and half do not. While the study participants are sleeping, their heart rates and amount of time spent in deep sleep are recorded with high-tech equipment.
At the end of the study, the researchers compare the total amount of time spent in deep sleep of the lavender-room participants with the no lavender-room participants.
The independent variable in this sleep study is lavender, and the dependent variable is the total amount of time spent in deep sleep.
A group of teachers is interested in which teaching method will work best for developing critical thinking skills.
So, they train a group of teachers in three different teaching styles : teacher-centered, where the teacher tells the students all about critical thinking; student-centered, where the students practice critical thinking and receive teacher feedback; and AI-assisted teaching, where the teacher uses a special software program to teach critical thinking.
At the end of three months, all the students take the same test that assesses critical thinking skills. The teachers then compare the scores of each of the three groups of students.
The independent variable is the teaching method, and the dependent variable is performance on the critical thinking test.
A chemicals company has developed three different versions of their concrete mix. Each version contains a different blend of specially developed chemicals. The company wants to know which version is the strongest.
So, they create three bridge molds that are identical in every way. They fill each mold with one of the different concrete mixtures. Next, they test the strength of each bridge by placing progressively more weight on its center until the bridge collapses.
In this study, the independent variable is the concrete mixture, and the dependent variable is the amount of weight at collapse.
People in the pizza business know that the crust is key. Many companies, large and small, will keep their recipe a top secret. Before rolling out a new type of crust, the company decides to conduct some research on consumer preferences.
The company has prepared three versions of their crust that vary in crunchiness, they are: a little crunchy, very crunchy, and super crunchy. They already have a pool of consumers that fit their customer profile and they often use them for testing.
Each participant sits in a booth and takes a bite of one version of the crust. They then indicate how much they liked it by pressing one of 5 buttons: didn’t like at all, liked, somewhat liked, liked very much, loved it.
The independent variable is the level of crust crunchiness, and the dependent variable is how much it was liked.
A large food company is considering entering the health and nutrition sector. Their R&D food scientists have developed a protein supplement that is designed to help build muscle mass for people that work out regularly.
The company approaches several gyms near its headquarters. They enlist the cooperation of over 120 gym rats that work out 5 days a week. Their muscle mass is measured, and only those with a lower level are selected for the study, leaving a total of 80 study participants.
They randomly assign half of the participants to take the recommended dosage of their supplement every day for three months after each workout. The other half takes the same amount of something that looks the same but actually does nothing to the body.
At the end of three months, the muscle mass of all participants is measured.
The independent variable is the supplement, and the dependent variable is muscle mass.
In the early days of airbags , automobile companies conducted a great deal of testing. At first, many people in the industry didn’t think airbags would be effective at all. Fortunately, there was a way to test this theory objectively.
In a representative example: Several crash cars were outfitted with an airbag, and an equal number were not. All crash cars were of the same make, year, and model. Then the crash experts rammed each car into a crash wall at the same speed. Sensors on the crash dummy skulls allowed for a scientific analysis of how much damage a human skull would incur.
The amount of skull damage of dummies in cars with airbags was then compared with those without airbags.
The independent variable was the airbag and the dependent variable was the amount of skull damage.
Some people take vitamins every day. A group of health scientists decides to conduct a study to determine if taking vitamins improves health.
They randomly select 1,000 people that are relatively similar in terms of their physical health. The key word here is “similar.”
Because the scientists have an unlimited budget (and because this is a hypothetical example, all of the participants have the same meals delivered to their homes (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), every day for one year.
In addition, the scientists randomly assign half of the participants to take a set of vitamins, supplied by the researchers every day for 1 year. The other half do not take the vitamins.
At the end of one year, the health of all participants is assessed, using blood pressure and cholesterol level as the key measurements.
In this highly unrealistic study, the independent variable is vitamins, and the dependent variable is health, as measured by blood pressure and cholesterol levels.
Does practicing meditation reduce stress? If you have ever wondered if this is true or not, then you are in luck because there is a way to know one way or the other.
All we have to do is find 90 people that are similar in age, stress levels, diet and exercise, and as many other factors as we can think of.
Next, we randomly assign each person to either practice meditation every day, three days a week, or not at all. After three months, we measure the stress levels of each person and compare the groups.
How should we measure stress? Well, there are a lot of ways. We could measure blood pressure, or the amount of the stress hormone cortisol in their blood, or by using a paper and pencil measure such as a questionnaire that asks them how much stress they feel.
In this study, the independent variable is meditation and the dependent variable is the amount of stress (however it is measured).
When video games started to become increasingly graphic, it was a huge concern in many countries in the world. Educators, social scientists, and parents were shocked at how graphic games were becoming.
Since then, there have been hundreds of studies conducted by psychologists and other researchers. A lot of those studies used an experimental design that involved males of various ages randomly assigned to play a graphic or non-graphic video game.
Afterward, their level of aggression was measured via a wide range of methods, including direct observations of their behavior, their actions when given the opportunity to be aggressive, or a variety of other measures.
So many studies have used so many different ways of measuring aggression.
In these experimental studies, the independent variable was graphic video games, and the dependent variable was observed level of aggression.
Car pollution is a concern for a lot of reasons. In addition to being bad for the environment, car exhaust may cause damage to the brain and impair cognitive performance.
One way to examine this possibility would be to conduct an animal study. The research would look something like this: laboratory rats would be raised in three different rooms that varied in the degree of car exhaust circulating in the room: no exhaust, little exhaust, or a lot of exhaust.
After a certain period of time, perhaps several months, the effects on cognitive performance could be measured.
One common way of assessing cognitive performance in laboratory rats is by measuring the amount of time it takes to run a maze successfully. It would also be possible to examine the physical effects of car exhaust on the brain by conducting an autopsy.
In this animal study, the independent variable would be car exhaust and the dependent variable would be amount of time to run a maze.
Read Next: Extraneous Variables Examples
The experiment is an incredibly valuable way to answer scientific questions regarding the cause and effect of certain variables. By manipulating the level of an independent variable and observing corresponding changes in a dependent variable, scientists can gain an understanding of many phenomena.
For example, scientists can learn if graphic video games make people more aggressive, if mediation reduces stress, if Gatorade improves athletic performance, and even if certain medical treatments can cure cancer.
The determination of causality is the key benefit of manipulating the independent variable and them observing changes in the dependent variable. Other research methodologies can reveal factors that are related to the dependent variable or associated with the dependent variable, but only when the independent variable is controlled by the researcher can causality be determined.
Ferguson, C. J. (2010). Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can graphic video games be a force for good? Review of General Psychology, 14 (2), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018941
Flannelly, L. T., Flannelly, K. J., & Jankowski, K. R. (2014). Independent, dependent, and other variables in healthcare and chaplaincy research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy , 20 (4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2014.959374
Manocha, R., Black, D., Sarris, J., & Stough, C.(2011). A randomized, controlled trial of meditation for work stress, anxiety and depressed mood in full-time workers. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine , vol. 2011, Article ID 960583. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/960583
Rumrill, P. D., Jr. (2004). Non-manipulation quantitative designs. Work (Reading, Mass.) , 22 (3), 255–260.
Taylor, J. M., & Rowe, B. J. (2012). The “Mozart Effect” and the mathematical connection, Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42 (2), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2012.10850354
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
March 7, 2021 - paper 2 psychology in context | research methods, variables: independent and dependent variable.
There are two main variables when it comes to psychological research, these are;
(1) The Independent Variable (IV) the variable that is manipulated/changed
When carrying out a piece of research, a psychologists main concern is looking at the effects of just the IV on the DV, in order to do this, all other extraneous variables (EVs) need to be controlled.
Between the control condition and the experimental condition the only thing that should change is the IV for example, when looking at the effects of music on memory, in the control condition the participants should complete a memory test with no music playing, in the experimental condition, the participants should complete a memory test with music playing. The only thing that should change across these conditions is whether the participants complete the memory test with or without music. All other variables the memory test difficulty, age of participant, gender of participant, background noise, temperature of the room etc should remain consistent.
If a researcher controls for extraneous variables and the only variable to change across the control and experimental condition is the IV it can be seen that the research has been carried out successfully. This means that the researcher has observed the effects of just the IV on the DV, which also means that the researcher can establish a cause and effect relationship ( they can be confident that the IV has been the only variable to effect the DV) and therefore can say that their experiment has high internal validity . High internal validity is when the researcher is confident that they have measured what they intended to measure (i.e. the effects of just the IV on the DV) and that all extraneous variables (EVs) have been controlled and that there are no confounding variables (CVs) in their study.
(1) Participant Variables: This refers to anything specific to the participant that could affect the results of the research, for example, a participant’s age, gender, intelligence, personality etc
(3) Situational Variables: Refers to the experimental setting and surrounding environment must be controlled between conditions to avoid them impacting on the results, for example, the temperature of the room in which the experiment is taking place, the time of day, the weather etc
(4) Experimenter Effects: This refers to anything specific to the experimenter that could affect the results of the research, for example, the gender of the experimenter (e.g. if an experiment was taking place investigating the social life of university students a 50+ researcher may not be the best person to obtain this information from the participants as the participants may feel this person would judge their behaviours this could lead to the participants not being honest). The mood and personality of the researcher could also be experimenter effects that could impact on the results of the study.
When a study is carried out with an extraneous variable (EV) present, this EV becomes a confounding variable (CV) due to the fact that it’s presence confounds the results of the study.
In experiments, the researcher manipulates the IV to find the effect it has on the DV. To preserve the internal validity of an experiment, the IV and DV must be operationalised.
For example, if a researcher was looking at the effects of hunger on memory, they would have to consider how they are going to measure the IV ‘hunger’ and how they are going to measure the DV ‘memory.’
(1) a questionnaire assessing hunger, the higher the score on the questionnaire could indicate a high level of hunger
(2) the amount of ghrelin present in the participant’s stomach a high amount of ghrelin indicates that the participant is hungry
Why not use the summary infographic below as a revision cue card for this topic?
In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Graduate faster
Better quality online classes
Flexible schedule
Access to top-rated instructors
03.17.2022 • 6 min read
Subject Matter Expert
This article describes what a variable is, what dependent and independent variables are, a list of examples, how they are used in psychology studies, and more.
In This Article
Dependent variables, independent variables, examples of experiments with variables, how are dependent and independent variables used in psychology research, don't overpay for college statistics.
Take Intro to Statistics Online with Outlier.org
From the co-founder of MasterClass, earn transferable college credits from the University of Pittsburgh (a top 50 global school). The world's best online college courses for 50% less than a traditional college.
In an experiment, researchers strive to understand if (and how) one thing affects another. The elements of an experiment that might affect one another are called variables. Variables are attributes that can change.
For example, imagine you design an experiment to test whether a self-reported mood is affected by ambient noise. Your hypothesis (i.e., testable prediction) is that nature sounds will improve a self-reported mood. Your research design is relatively simple: you survey people about their mood before the experiment, then you ask them to spend 30 minutes reading a psychology textbook in a room with no added noise (just the standard whirring of fans and background noises); or you ask them to spend 30 minutes reading a psychology textbook in a room with a bird song and a babbling brook (the experimental condition).
In this case, your variables are mood and ambient noise. Both factors can be changed. Mood can stay the same, be improved, or be worsened. While ambient noise could be altered in many ways (nature sounds, white noise, talking, etc.).
Understanding what the variables are in an experiment is critical to understanding how the experiment is designed. Broadly, there are two types of variables: independent variables and dependent variables.
The dependent variable is the variable that a researcher measures to determine the effect of the independent variable. The dependent variable depends on the independent variable. In our experiment, the dependent variable would be the change in self-reported mood.
The independent variable is the variable that the researcher or experimenter manipulates to affect the dependent variable. It is independent of the other variables in an experiment. In other words, the independent variable causes some kind of change in the dependent variable. In our experiment, the independent variable would be the noise in the room (unaltered ambient noise, or nature sounds). If you know the independent variable definition and dependent variable definition, it’ll be easier to understand how experiments work. When designing an experiment, the goal is to ensure that the only difference between the two conditions is the independent variable.
Understanding what the variables are in an experiment is critical to understanding how the experiment is designed.
Now that we understand that the dependent variable is the variable being measured to determine the effect of the independent variable (the variable causing the effect), let’s work through a few more examples.
In this example, let’s consider the effect of an act of kindness on charitable donations. In this experiment, imagine you want to test whether being helped by someone else impacts how much money a person donates. You set up your experiment as follows: participants come to a lab. In the control condition (the baseline), the participant arrives at the lab, opens the door, and you give them $20. Then you ask them if they would like to donate any portion of their $20 before leaving the room. In the experimental condition, as the participant heads to the door of the lab, a person walking by (a confederate, or accomplice, in the experiment) goes out of their way to open the door for them. The experiment proceeds exactly as the control; the participant is given $20 and asked if they would like to donate any portion of the money.
Let’s pause for a moment. Can you identify the dependent and independent variables in this experiment?
We should begin by identifying the variables. In this experiment, the variables are:
Being helped with the door or not
How much money a participant allocates to charity
Since the dependent variable is the variable we measure, we know that, in this case, it is the amount of money allocated to charity. The dependent variable could be anywhere from $0 to $20. The independent variable, the variable that we manipulate, is whether or not we help the participant with the door.
Imagine that participants who are helped with the door, on average, donate $10 to charity, and participants who are not helped with the door on average donate $5 to charity. It might be the case that being helped with the door (the independent variable) increases the likelihood someone will donate to charity (the dependent variable). Of course, this is just an example.
To feel more confident about these results, we would need to know how many people were in the study (the sample size), and we would need to analyze the results for statistical significance.
Let’s consider another example. Imagine you hypothesize that people will wave back more to you when you are wearing casual clothes than to when you are wearing ragged clothes. In this case, the variables are the number of hand waves and clothing type. Since we will be counting the number of waves, this gives us a clue that the number of waves is the dependent variable. Since we think the type of clothing will affect how many waves are given, we can determine that the type of clothing is the independent variable.
The number of waves depends on the type of clothing. If more people wave back to you when you are wearing casual clothes than when you are wearing ragged clothes, you have evidence that suggests that what you are wearing affects how people respond to you. Of course, as in the previous example, you will need to conduct a careful study with a large sample and statistical analysis to feel confident in your results.
The examples above help us understand why independent and dependent variables are so important to psychological research. In psychology, researchers often want to understand how and why people think, feel, and behave in certain ways. In order to answer questions about people’s motivation, cognition, emotions, and behavior, we often use experiments.
Whether you’re doing qualitative or quantitative research , independent and dependent variables are critical to the experimental process. Independent and dependent variables help determine cause and effect. A good hypothesis asks what effect an independent variable has on a dependent variable. Without experimental research, we would not be able to determine (with any confidence) how one variable may or may not impact another; we would not be able to determine cause and effect.
A good hypothesis asks what effect an independent variable has on a dependent variable.
No, a variable cannot be both independent and dependent at the same time. You can think of the independent variable as the cause and the dependent variable as the effect. You cannot have something in an experiment that is both the cause and the effect. In other words, the independent variable must be independent of other variables and the dependent variable depends on the independent variable.
Yes, you can include more than one independent or dependent variable in a study. For example, you might have one independent variable that affects multiple dependent variables or a couple of independent variables that affect one dependent variable. Keep in mind that, generally, the more variables you have in a study, the more difficult it will be to determine cause and effect. It is generally better to have more dependent variables than independent variables in a study because, with many independent variables, it can be difficult to determine which one caused a particular effect.
We might also refer to an independent variable as a predictor variable, explanatory variable, control variable, manipulated variable, or regressor. Then we might also refer to a dependent variable as a predicted variable, response variable, responding variable, or outcome variable.
Outlier (from the co-founder of MasterClass) has brought together some of the world's best instructors, game designers, and filmmakers to create the future of online college.
Check out these related courses:
The science of the mind.
The big questions, examined.
The mathematics of change.
This article should provide a comprehensive view and explanation of Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development.
When conducting research, we can use both qualitative and quantitative methods. In this article, we’ll examine the definition of both of these approaches and look at how and when to use each of them.
As the founder and leading proponent of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud was a central figure in 20th-century psychology. In this article, we’ll look at a number of his ideas about the human mind's inner workings, and then survey both his work’s enduring influence and the criticism it has received.
What is standard error statistics calculation and overview, understanding variables in statistics: types & examples, what do subsets mean in statistics, test statistics: definition, formulas & examples, what is a residual in stats, understanding sampling distributions: what are they and how do they work.
Dependent Variable The variable that depends on other factors that are measured. These variables are expected to change as a result of an experimental manipulation of the independent variable or variables. It is the presumed effect.
Independent Variable The variable that is stable and unaffected by the other variables you are trying to measure. It refers to the condition of an experiment that is systematically manipulated by the investigator. It is the presumed cause.
Cramer, Duncan and Dennis Howitt. The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics . London: SAGE, 2004; Penslar, Robin Levin and Joan P. Porter. Institutional Review Board Guidebook: Introduction . Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010; "What are Dependent and Independent Variables?" Graphic Tutorial.
Don't feel bad if you are confused about what is the dependent variable and what is the independent variable in social and behavioral sciences research . However, it's important that you learn the difference because framing a study using these variables is a common approach to organizing the elements of a social sciences research study in order to discover relevant and meaningful results. Specifically, it is important for these two reasons:
A variable in research simply refers to a person, place, thing, or phenomenon that you are trying to measure in some way. The best way to understand the difference between a dependent and independent variable is that the meaning of each is implied by what the words tell us about the variable you are using. You can do this with a simple exercise from the website, Graphic Tutorial. Take the sentence, "The [independent variable] causes a change in [dependent variable] and it is not possible that [dependent variable] could cause a change in [independent variable]." Insert the names of variables you are using in the sentence in the way that makes the most sense. This will help you identify each type of variable. If you're still not sure, consult with your professor before you begin to write.
Fan, Shihe. "Independent Variable." In Encyclopedia of Research Design. Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010), pp. 592-594; "What are Dependent and Independent Variables?" Graphic Tutorial; Salkind, Neil J. "Dependent Variable." In Encyclopedia of Research Design , Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010), pp. 348-349;
The process of examining a research problem in the social and behavioral sciences is often framed around methods of analysis that compare, contrast, correlate, average, or integrate relationships between or among variables . Techniques include associations, sampling, random selection, and blind selection. Designation of the dependent and independent variable involves unpacking the research problem in a way that identifies a general cause and effect and classifying these variables as either independent or dependent.
The variables should be outlined in the introduction of your paper and explained in more detail in the methods section . There are no rules about the structure and style for writing about independent or dependent variables but, as with any academic writing, clarity and being succinct is most important.
After you have described the research problem and its significance in relation to prior research, explain why you have chosen to examine the problem using a method of analysis that investigates the relationships between or among independent and dependent variables . State what it is about the research problem that lends itself to this type of analysis. For example, if you are investigating the relationship between corporate environmental sustainability efforts [the independent variable] and dependent variables associated with measuring employee satisfaction at work using a survey instrument, you would first identify each variable and then provide background information about the variables. What is meant by "environmental sustainability"? Are you looking at a particular company [e.g., General Motors] or are you investigating an industry [e.g., the meat packing industry]? Why is employee satisfaction in the workplace important? How does a company make their employees aware of sustainability efforts and why would a company even care that its employees know about these efforts?
Identify each variable for the reader and define each . In the introduction, this information can be presented in a paragraph or two when you describe how you are going to study the research problem. In the methods section, you build on the literature review of prior studies about the research problem to describe in detail background about each variable, breaking each down for measurement and analysis. For example, what activities do you examine that reflect a company's commitment to environmental sustainability? Levels of employee satisfaction can be measured by a survey that asks about things like volunteerism or a desire to stay at the company for a long time.
The structure and writing style of describing the variables and their application to analyzing the research problem should be stated and unpacked in such a way that the reader obtains a clear understanding of the relationships between the variables and why they are important. This is also important so that the study can be replicated in the future using the same variables but applied in a different way.
Fan, Shihe. "Independent Variable." In Encyclopedia of Research Design. Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010), pp. 592-594; "What are Dependent and Independent Variables?" Graphic Tutorial; “Case Example for Independent and Dependent Variables.” ORI Curriculum Examples. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity; Salkind, Neil J. "Dependent Variable." In Encyclopedia of Research Design , Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010), pp. 348-349; “Independent Variables and Dependent Variables.” Karl L. Wuensch, Department of Psychology, East Carolina University [posted email exchange]; “Variables.” Elements of Research. Dr. Camille Nebeker, San Diego State University.
Live revision! Join us for our free exam revision livestreams Watch now →
Reference Library
Collections
Study notes, videos, interactive activities and more!
Psychology news, insights and enrichment
Currated collections of free resources
Browse resources by topic
Resource Selections
Currated lists of resources
Study Notes
Last updated 22 Mar 2021
An independent variable (IV) is a variable that is manipulated by a researcher to investigate whether it consequently brings change in another variable. This other variable, which is measured and predicted to be dependent upon the IV, is therefore named the dependent variable (DV).
For example, in an experiment examining the effect of fatigue on short term memory, there are two groups ‘fatigued’ and ‘non-fatigued’. The fatigued group run for 10 minutes without stopping prior to being tested. Both groups are given a list of words to recall immediately after reading the list.
The independent variable in this example would be fatigued/non-fatigued as it has been manipulated by the experimenter.
The dependent variable would be the number of words recalled off the list because that is how the participants’ performance is measured.
IVs and DVs only occur in experiments, as a cause and effect is predicted between the two (i.e. that changes in the IV will directly lead to changes in the DV).
IVs and DVs do not feature in correlation studies, as correlation studies look for a relationship between co-variables, cause and effect is therefore not established as the variables are predicted to change in response to each other.
Research methods: mcq revision test 1 for aqa a level psychology.
Topic Videos
Exam Support
Conformity to social roles as investigated by zimbardo.
Quizzes & Activities
Research control, example answer for question 11 paper 2: a level psychology, june 2017 (aqa), example answer for question 18 paper 2: a level psychology, june 2017 (aqa), our subjects.
Boston House, 214 High Street, Boston Spa, West Yorkshire, LS23 6AD Tel: 01937 848885
© 2002-2024 Tutor2u Limited. Company Reg no: 04489574. VAT reg no 816865400.
Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips
Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist and international bestselling author. Her books, including "13 Things Mentally Strong People Don't Do," have been translated into more than 40 languages. Her TEDx talk, "The Secret of Becoming Mentally Strong," is one of the most viewed talks of all time.
Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz
Falsifiability of a hypothesis.
Hypotheses examples.
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.
Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."
A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.
In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:
The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.
Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen.
In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.
Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.
In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment do not support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.
In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."
In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."
So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:
Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.
To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:
In the scientific method , falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.
Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that if something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.
One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.
A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.
Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.
For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.
These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.
One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.
Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.
Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.
To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.
The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:
A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the dependent variable if you change the independent variable .
The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."
Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.
Descriptive research such as case studies , naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.
Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a correlational study can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.
Experimental methods are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).
Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually cause another to change.
The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.
Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses . R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607
Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:]. Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z
Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004
Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ? PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies . Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Making experimental research in psychology more transparent.
Posted October 22, 2015
Research Methods in Psychology is a standard required course in pretty much any psychology major. In our department at SUNY New Paltz, this is a four-credit class with a large laboratory component. And students often dread the class before they walk into the door.
Getting students to understand the nature of research in the behavioral sciences is critical in cultivating alumni who can conduct their own research and who can critically understand and evaluate the research of others. The concepts in the behavioral sciences are based on empirical research – our students must understand this stuff well in order to warrant their degrees!
Based on having taught research methods since about 1998, I can tell you that teaching this class can be truly fun and rewarding. I’m genuinely excited about designing and implementing research, so I just describe the process (and the different kinds of research) and encourage my students to follow suit on this exciting path to discovery. I really enjoy teaching this one - in spite of students' preconceived notions!
This said, as with any class, there are some eternal issues that come up each time I teach it. One of the most frustrating issues that emerges in teaching this class pertains to the concepts of “independent” and “dependent” variables. These concepts are foundational in understanding experimental research – and a good deal of the content in the class builds on this foundation. Students have to get this stuff. This said, students so often don’t understand these concepts – even after they have graduated! I’ve seen this time and time again and I can tell you that it can be a little disappointing!
What are the “Independent” and “Dependent Variables?”
In short, independent and dependent variables are conceptual variables that exist in any true experimental design – with an experimental design being one in which the researcher hopes to infer that changes in levels of one variable cause changes in scores on some other variable. For instance, you might want to see if the amount of coffee that someone has (based on randomly assigning people to drink either no coffee or to drink five cups in an hour) relates to how jittery a person is on some graded (continuous) measure of jitteriness.
In this study, as in any experiment, you have the variable that you think is causing changes in the other variable. This “potentially causal variable” is called, traditionally, the “independent variable.” With the current example, that would be the coffee. The other variable, which you think is affected by the independent variable (in this case, someone’s score on the jitteriness scale), is traditionally called the “dependent variable.”
This said, when you describe all this as simple as day to a group of bright students and then test them on how well they understand these concepts, it’s always shocking how many of them don’t get it!
Why Do Students Find It Hard To Understand the Concepts of “Independent” and “Dependent Variables?”
Part of the problem here is this: These terms have lost their intuitive meaning! Students don’t necessarily see how the term “independent variable” corresponds to a variable that potentially causes changes in another variable. And they don’t inherently see how the term “dependent variable” means the variable that is potentially affected by that first variable.
We should change what we call these things!
Proposed New Terms for the concepts of “Independent” and “Dependent Variable”
If I may … how about we label these concepts with terms that students can better understand! In the above example, the amount of coffee that each participant gets is a potentially causal variable – as this variable potentially causes changes in the other variable (of jitteriness). So let’s call this first variable the “Potentially Causal Variable!”
The “dependent variable,” in this case the amount of jitteriness that one demonstrates, is the outcome in the study. Sometimes researchers, thus, will refer to this variable as the “outcome variable.” Let’s always do that and let’s do that formally!
Bottom Line
I love teaching about the research process to bright young students of the behavioral sciences – and I often find myself thinking about ways to do it better. After seeing hundreds of students across my years and years of teaching Research Methods struggle with the concepts of “independent” and “dependent variable,” from where I stand, I think we may well do everyone a favor by changing the names of these terms.
Potentially Causal Variable and Outcome Variable mean what they say – I say we go with that! One day when I check “write Research Methods textbook” off my bucket list, you can bet that I’m going this path!
Glenn Geher, Ph.D. , is professor of psychology at the State University of New York at New Paltz. He is founding director of the campus’ Evolutionary Studies (EvoS) program.
Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.
Instructor catalog, our solutions.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.
Learning objectives.
Imagine that you have made the effort to find a research topic, review the research literature, formulate a question, design an experiment, obtain institutional review board (IRB) approval, recruit research participants, and manipulate an independent variable. It would seem almost wasteful to measure a single dependent variable. Even if you are primarily interested in the relationship between an independent variable and one primary dependent variable, there are usually several more questions that you can answer easily by including multiple dependent variables .
Often a researcher wants to know how an independent variable affects several distinct dependent variables. For example, Schnall and her colleagues were interested in how feeling disgusted affects the harshness of people’s moral judgments, but they were also curious about how disgust affects other variables, such as people’s willingness to eat in a restaurant. As another example, researcher Susan Knasko was interested in how different odors affect people’s behavior (Knasko, 1992). She conducted an experiment in which the independent variable was whether participants were tested in a room with no odor or in one scented with lemon, lavender, or dimethyl sulfide (which has a cabbagelike smell). Although she was primarily interested in how the odors affected people’s creativity, she was also curious about how they affected people’s moods and perceived health—and it was a simple enough matter to measure these dependent variables too. Although she found that creativity was unaffected by the ambient odor, she found that people’s moods were lower in the dimethyl sulfide condition, and that their perceived health was greater in the lemon condition.
When an experiment includes multiple dependent variables, there is again a possibility of carryover effects. For example, it is possible that measuring participants’ moods before measuring their perceived health could affect their perceived health or that measuring their perceived health before their moods could affect their moods. So the order in which multiple dependent variables are measured becomes an issue. One approach is to measure them in the same order for all participants—usually with the most important one first so that it cannot be affected by measuring the others. Another approach is to counterbalance, or systematically vary, the order in which the dependent variables are measured.
When the independent variable is a construct that can only be manipulated indirectly—such as emotions and other internal states—an additional measure of that independent variable is often included as a manipulation check . This is done to confirm that the independent variable was, in fact, successfully manipulated. For example, Schnall and her colleagues had their participants rate their level of disgust to be sure that those in the messy room actually felt more disgusted than those in the clean room. Manipulation checks are usually done at the end of the procedure to be sure that the effect of the manipulation lasted throughout the entire procedure and to avoid calling unnecessary attention to the manipulation.
Manipulation checks become especially important when the manipulation of the independent variable turns out to have no effect on the dependent variable. Imagine, for example, that you exposed participants to happy or sad movie music—intending to put them in happy or sad moods—but you found that this had no effect on the number of happy or sad childhood events they recalled. This could be because being in a happy or sad mood has no effect on memories for childhood events. But it could also be that the music was ineffective at putting participants in happy or sad moods. A manipulation check—in this case, a measure of participants’ moods—would help resolve this uncertainty. If it showed that you had successfully manipulated participants’ moods, then it would appear that there is indeed no effect of mood on memory for childhood events. But if it showed that you did not successfully manipulate participants’ moods, then it would appear that you need a more effective manipulation to answer your research question.
Another common approach to including multiple dependent variables is to operationally define and measure the same construct, or closely related ones, in different ways. Imagine, for example, that a researcher conducts an experiment on the effect of daily exercise on stress. The dependent variable, stress, is a construct that can be operationally defined in different ways. For this reason, the researcher might have participants complete the paper-and-pencil Perceived Stress Scale and measure their levels of the stress hormone cortisol. This is an example of the use of converging operations. If the researcher finds that the different measures are affected by exercise in the same way, then he or she can be confident in the conclusion that exercise affects the more general construct of stress.
When multiple dependent variables are different measures of the same construct—especially if they are measured on the same scale—researchers have the option of combining them into a single measure of that construct. Recall that Schnall and her colleagues were interested in the harshness of people’s moral judgments. To measure this construct, they presented their participants with seven different scenarios describing morally questionable behaviors and asked them to rate the moral acceptability of each one. Although they could have treated each of the seven ratings as a separate dependent variable, these researchers combined them into a single dependent variable by computing their mean.
When researchers combine dependent variables in this way, they are treating them collectively as a multiple-response measure of a single construct. The advantage of this is that multiple-response measures are generally more reliable than single-response measures. However, it is important to make sure the individual dependent variables are correlated with each other by computing an internal consistency measure such as Cronbach’s α. If they are not correlated with each other, then it does not make sense to combine them into a measure of a single construct. If they have poor internal consistency, then they should be treated as separate dependent variables.
Knasko, S. C. (1992). Ambient odor’s effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical Senses , 17 , 27–35.
Research Methods in Psychology Copyright © 2016 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
In research, a variable is any characteristic, number, or quantity that can be measured or counted in experimental investigations. One is called the dependent variable, and the other is the independent variable. In research, the independent variable is manipulated to observe its effect, while the dependent variable is the measured outcome.
The two main types of variables in psychology are the independent variable and the dependent variable. Both variables are important in the process of collecting data about psychological phenomena. This article discusses different types of variables that are used in psychology research. It also covers how to operationalize these variables when ...
While the independent variable is the " cause ", the dependent variable is the " effect " - or rather, the affected variable. In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable. Keeping with the previous example, let's look at some dependent variables ...
The independent variable (IV) in psychology is the characteristic of an experiment that is manipulated or changed by researchers, not by other variables in the experiment. For example, in an experiment looking at the effects of studying on test scores, studying would be the independent variable. Researchers are trying to determine if changes to ...
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable. Example: Independent and dependent variables. You design a study to test whether changes in room temperature have an effect on math test scores.
The independent variable is the catalyst, the initial spark that sets the wheels of research in motion. Dependent Variable. The dependent variable is the outcome we observe and measure. It's the altered flavor of the soup that results from the chef's culinary experiments.
The independent variable is the director, making deliberate changes to the scene, while the dependent variable is the actor, whose performance is influenced by the director's choices. For instance, a psychologist might want to understand if sleep quality affects memory performance. Here, the independent variable could be the number of hours ...
What is the difference between independent and dependent variables? In this video, Dr. Kushner breaks down how variables are used in psychology research.
Experiments always have an independent and dependent variable. The independent variable is the one the experimenter manipulates (the thing that changes between the conditions the participants are placed into). It is assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable. The dependent variable is the thing being measured, or the results of ...
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable. Example: Independent and dependent variables. You design a study to test whether changes in room temperature have an effect on maths test scores.
Background Mediation analysis investigates whether a variable (i.e., mediator) changes in regard to an independent variable, in turn, affecting a dependent variable. Moderation analysis, on the other hand, investigates whether the statistical interaction between independent variables predict a dependent variable. Although this difference between these two types of analysis is explicit in ...
Examples of Independent and Dependent Variables. 1. Gatorade and Improved Athletic Performance. A sports medicine researcher has been hired by Gatorade to test the effects of its sports drink on athletic performance. The company wants to claim that when an athlete drinks Gatorade, their performance will improve.
Variables: Independent And Dependent Variable. There are two main variables when it comes to psychological research, these are; (1) The Independent Variable (IV) the variable that is manipulated/changed (2) The Dependent Variable (DV) the variable that is measured (e.g. it measures whether or not the IV has influence human behaviour). When carrying out a piece of research, a psychologists main ...
Research Topic Independent Variable Dependent Variable; All Research Topics: Manipulated by the researcher. ... Upgrade to Premium to enroll in Psychology 105: Research Methods in Psychology.
Independent Variables. The independent variable is the variable that the researcher or experimenter manipulates to affect the dependent variable. It is independent of the other variables in an experiment. In other words, the independent variable causes some kind of change in the dependent variable.
A variable in research simply refers to a person, place, thing, or phenomenon that you are trying to measure in some way. ... Designation of the dependent and independent variable involves unpacking the research problem in a way that identifies a general cause and effect and classifying these variables as either independent or dependent ...
An independent variable (IV) is a variable that is manipulated by a researcher to investigate whether it consequently brings change in another variable. This other variable, which is measured and predicted to be dependent upon the IV, is therefore named the dependent variable (DV).. For example, in an experiment examining the effect of fatigue on short term memory, there are two groups ...
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...
This "potentially causal variable" is called, traditionally, the "independent variable.". With the current example, that would be the coffee. The other variable, which you think is ...
In principle, factorial designs can include any number of independent variables with any number of levels. For example, an experiment could include the type of psychotherapy (cognitive vs. behavioral), the length of the psychotherapy (2 weeks vs. 2 months), and the sex of the psychotherapist (female vs. male).
Psychology students often struggle with the difference between the independent and dependent variables. After covering these concepts, ask students to work in pairs or small groups to identify both the independent variable(s) and the dependent variable(s) in each example. Hypothesis: Creating concrete examples will improve recall.
Key Takeaways. Researchers in psychology often include multiple dependent variables in their studies. The primary reason is that this easily allows them to answer more research questions with minimal additional effort. When an independent variable is a construct that is manipulated indirectly, it is a good idea to include a manipulation check.
Independent and dependent variables are both mathematical and statistical tools that are utilised in research and experiments by statisticians and researchers. Both variables enable statistician measure results. maintain control and draw defined conclusions. Therefore during research. the variables are manipulated by the experimenters.