research topics about education distance learning

Capturing the benefits of remote learning

How education experts are applying lessons learned in the pandemic to promote positive outcomes for all students

Vol. 52 No. 6 Print version: page 46

• Schools and Classrooms

With schools open again after more than a year of teaching students outside the classroom, the pandemic sometimes feels like a distant memory. The return to classrooms this fall brings major relief for many families and educators. Factors such as a lack of reliable technology and family support, along with an absence of school resources, resulted in significant academic setbacks, not to mention stress for everyone involved.

But for all the downsides of distance learning, educators, psychologists, and parents have seen some benefits as well. For example, certain populations of students found new ways to be more engaged in learning, without the distractions and difficulties they faced in the classroom, and the general challenges of remote learning and the pandemic brought mental health to the forefront of the classroom experience.

Peter Faustino, PsyD, a school psychologist in Scarsdale, New York, said the pandemic also prompted educators and school psychologists to find creative new ways of ensuring students’ emotional and academic well-being. “So many students were impacted by the pandemic, so we couldn’t just assume they would find resources on their own,” said Faustino. “We had to work hard at figuring out new ways to connect with them.”

Here are some of the benefits of distance learning that school psychologists and educators have observed and the ways in which they’re implementing those lessons post-pandemic, with the goal of creating a more equitable, productive environment for all students.

Prioritizing mental health

Faustino said that during the pandemic, he had more mental health conversations with students, families, and teachers than ever. “Because COVID-19 affected everyone, we’re now having mental health discussions as school leaders on a daily and weekly basis,” he said.

This renewed focus on mental health has the potential to improve students’ well-being in profound ways—starting with helping them recover from the pandemic’s effects. In New York City, for example, schools are hiring more than 600 new clinicians, including psychologists , to screen students’ mental health and help them process pandemic-related trauma and adjust to the “new normal” of attending school in person.

Educators and families are also realizing the importance of protecting students’ mental health more generally—not only for their health and safety but for their learning. “We’ve been seeing a broader appreciation for the fact that mental health is a prerequisite for learning rather than an extracurricular pursuit,” said Eric Rossen, PhD, director of professional development and standards at the National Association of School Psychologists.

As a result, Rossen hopes educators will embed social and emotional learning components into daily instruction. For example, teachers could teach mindfulness techniques in the classroom and take in-the-moment opportunities to help kids resolve conflicts or manage stress.

Improved access to mental health resources in schools is another positive effect. Because of physical distancing guidelines, school leaders had to find ways to deliver mental health services remotely, including via online referrals and teletherapy with school psychologists and counselors.

Early in the pandemic, Faustino said he was hesitant about teletherapy’s effectiveness; now, he hopes to continue offering a virtual option. Online scheduling and remote appointments make it easier for students to access mental health resources, and some students even enjoy virtual appointments more, as they can attend therapy in their own spaces rather than showing up in the counselor’s office. For older students, Faustino said that level of comfort often leads to more productive, open conversations.

Autonomy as a key to motivation

Research suggests that when students have more choices about their materials and activities, they’re more motivated—which may translate to increased learning and academic success. In a 2016 paper, psychology researcher Allan Wigfield, PhD, and colleagues make the case that control and autonomy in reading activities can improve both motivation and comprehension ( Child Development Perspectives , Vol. 10, No. 3 ).

During the period of online teaching, some students had opportunities to learn at their own pace, which educators say improved their learning outcomes—especially in older students. In a 2020 survey of more than 600 parents, researchers found the second-most-valued benefit of distance learning was flexibility—not only in schedule but in method of learning.

In a recent study, researchers found that 18% of parents pointed to greater flexibility in a child’s schedule or way of learning as the biggest benefit or positive outcome related to remote learning ( School Psychology , Roy, A., et al., in press).

This individualized learning helps students find more free time for interests and also allows them to conduct their learning at a time they’re most likely to succeed. During the pandemic, Mark Gardner, an English teacher at Hayes Freedom High School in Camas, Washington, said he realized how important student-centered learning is and that whether learning happens should take precedence over how and when it occurs.

For example, one of his students thrived when he had the choice to do work later at night because he took care of his siblings during the day. Now, Gardner posts homework online on Sundays so students can work at their own pace during the week. “Going forward, we want to create as many access points as we can for kids to engage with learning,” he said.

Rosanna Breaux , PhD, an assistant professor of psychology and assistant director of the Child Study Center at Virginia Tech, agrees. “I’d like to see this flexibility continue in some way, where—similar to college—students can guide their own learning based on their interests or when they’re most productive,” she said.

During the pandemic, many educators were forced to rethink how to keep students engaged. Rossen said because many school districts shared virtual curricula during the period of remote learning, older students could take more challenging or interesting courses than they could in person. The same is true for younger students: Megan Hibbard, a teacher in White Bear Lake, Minnesota, said many of her fifth graders enjoyed distance learning more than in-person because they could work on projects that aligned with their interests.

“So much of motivation is discovering the unique things the student finds interesting,” said Hunter Gehlbach, PhD, a professor and vice dean at the Johns Hopkins School of Education. “The more you can facilitate students spending more time on the things they’re really interested in, the better.”

Going forward, Rossen hopes virtual curricula will allow students greater opportunities to pursue their interests, such as by taking AP classes, foreign languages, or vocational electives not available at their own schools.

Conversely, Hibbard’s goal is to increase opportunities for students to pursue their interests in the in-person setting. For example, she plans to increase what she calls “Genius Hours,” a time at the end of the school day when students can focus on high-interest projects they’ll eventually share with the class.

Better understanding of children's needs

One of the most important predictors of a child’s success in school is parental involvement in their education. For example, in a meta-analysis of studies, researchers linked parental engagement in their middle schoolers’ education with greater measures of success (Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F., Developmental Psychology , Vol. 45, No. 3, 2009).

During the pandemic, parents had new opportunities to learn about their kids and, as a result, help them learn. According to a study by Breaux and colleagues, many parents reported that the pandemic allowed them a better understanding of their child’s learning style, needs, or curriculum.

James C. Kaufman , PhD, a professor of educational psychology at the University of Connecticut and the father of an elementary schooler and a high schooler, said he’s had a front-row seat for his sons’ learning for the first time. “Watching my kids learn and engage with classmates has given me some insight in how to parent them,” he said.

Stephen Becker , PhD, a pediatric psychologist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, said some parents have observed their children’s behavior or learning needs for the first time, which could prompt them to consider assessment and Individualized Education Program (IEP) services. Across the board, Gehlbach said parents are realizing how they can better partner with schools to ensure their kids’ well-being and academic success.

For example, Samantha Marks , PsyD, a Florida-based clinical psychologist, said she realized how much help her middle school daughter, a gifted and talented student with a 504 plan (a plan for how the school will offer support for a student’s disability) for anxiety, needed with independence. “Bringing the learning home made it crystal clear what we needed to teach our daughter to be independent and improve executive functioning” she said. “My takeaway from this is that more parents need to be involved in their children’s education in a healthy, helpful way.”

Marks also gained a deeper understanding of her daughter’s mental health needs. Through her 504 plan, she received help managing her anxiety at school—at home, though, Marks wasn’t always available to help, which taught her the importance of helping her daughter manage her anxiety independently.

Along with parents gaining a deeper understanding of their kids’ needs, the pandemic also prompted greater parent participation in school. For example, Rossen said his kids’ school had virtual school board meetings; he hopes virtual options continue for events like back-to-school information sessions and parenting workshops. “These meetings are often in the evening, and if you’re a single parent or sole caregiver, you may not want to pay a babysitter in order to attend,” he said.

Brittany Greiert, PhD, a school psychologist in Aurora, Colorado, says culturally and linguistically diverse families at her schools benefited from streamlined opportunities to communicate with administrators and teachers. Her district used an app that translates parent communication into 150 languages. Parents can also remotely participate in meetings with school psychologists or teachers, which Greiert says she plans to continue post-pandemic.

Decreased bullying

During stay-at-home orders, kids with neurodevelopmental disorders experienced less bullying than pre-pandemic (McFayden, T. C., et al., Journal of Rural Mental Health , No. 45, Vol. 2, 2021). According to 2019 research, children with emotional, behavioral, and physical health needs experience increased rates of bullying victimization ( Lebrun-Harris, L. A., et al., ), and from the U.S. Department of Education suggests the majority of bullying takes place in person and in unsupervised areas (PDF) .

Scott Graves , PhD, an associate professor of educational studies at The Ohio State University and a member of APA’s Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education (CPSE), said the supervision by parents and teachers in remote learning likely played a part in reducing bullying. As a result, he’s less worried his Black sons will be victims of microaggressions and racist behavior during online learning.

Some Asian American families also report that remote learning offered protection against racism students may have experienced in person. Shereen Naser, PhD, an associate professor of psychology at Cleveland State University and a member of CPSE, and colleagues found that students are more comfortable saying discriminatory things in school when their teachers are also doing so; Naser suspects this trickle-down effect is less likely to happen when students learn from home ( School Psychology International , 2019).

Reductions in bullying and microaggressions aren’t just beneficial for students’ long-term mental health. Breaux said less bullying at school results in less stress, which can improve students’ self-esteem and mood—both of which impact their ability to learn.

Patricia Perez, PhD, an associate professor of international psychology at The Chicago School of Professional Psychology and a member of CPSE, said it’s important for schools to be proactive in providing spaces for support and cultural expression for students from vulnerable backgrounds, whether in culture-specific clubs, all-school assemblies that address racism and other diversity-related topics, or safe spaces to process feelings with teachers.

According to Rossen, many schools are already considering how to continue supporting students at risk for bullying, including by restructuring the school environment.

One principal, Rossen said, recently switched to single-use bathrooms to avoid congregating in those spaces once in-person learning commences to maintain social distancing requirements. “The principal received feedback from students about how going to the bathroom is much less stressful for these students in part due to less bullying,” he said.

More opportunities for special needs students

In Becker and Breaux’s research, parents of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), particularly those with a 504 plan and IEP, reported greater difficulties with remote learning. But some students with special learning needs—including those with IEPs and 504 plans—thrived in an at-home learning environment. Recent reporting in The New York Times suggests this is one reason many students want to continue online learning.

According to Cara Laitusis, PhD, a principal research scientist at Educational Testing Service ( ETS ) and a member of CPSE, reduced distractions may improve learning outcomes for some students with disabilities that impact attention in a group setting. “In assessments, small group or individual settings are frequently requested accommodations for some students with ADHD, anxiety, or autism. Being in a quiet place alone without peers for part of the instructional day may also allow for more focus,” she said. However, she also pointed out the benefits of inclusion in the classroom for developing social skills with peers.

Remote learning has improved academic outcomes for students with different learning needs, too. Marks said her seventh-grade daughter, a visual learner, appreciated the increase in video presentations and graphics. Similarly, Hibbard said many of her students who struggle to grasp lessons on the first try have benefited from the ability to watch videos over again until they understand. Post-pandemic, she plans to record bite-size lessons—for example, a 1-minute video of a long division problem—so her students can rewatch and process at their own rate.

Learners with anxiety also appreciate the option not to be in the classroom, because the social pressures of being surrounded by peers can make it hard to focus on academics. “Several of my students have learned more in the last year simply due to the absence of anxiety,” said Rosie Reid, an English teacher at Ygnacio Valley High School in Concord, California, and a 2019 California Teacher of the Year. “It’s just one less thing to negotiate in a learning environment.”

On online learning platforms, it’s easier for kids with social anxiety or shyness to participate. One of Gardner’s students with social anxiety participated far more in virtual settings and chats. Now, Gardner is brainstorming ways to encourage students to chat in person, such as by projecting a chat screen on the blackboard.

Technology has helped school psychologists better engage students, too. For example, Greiert said the virtual setting gave her a new understanding of her students’ personalities and needs. “Typing out their thoughts, they were able to demonstrate humor or complex thoughts they never demonstrated in person,” she said. “I really want to keep incorporating technology into sessions so kids can keep building on their strengths.”

Reid says that along with the high school students she teaches, she’s seen her 6-year-old daughter benefit from learning at her own pace in the familiarity of her home. Before the pandemic, she was behind academically, but by guiding her own learning—writing poems, reading books, playing outside with her siblings—she’s blossomed. “For me, as both a mother and as a teacher, this whole phenomenon has opened the door to what education can be,” Reid said.

Eleanor Di Marino-Linnen, PhD, a psychologist and superintendent of the Rose Tree Media School District in Media, Pennsylvania, says the pandemic afforded her district a chance to rethink old routines and implement new ones. “As challenging as it is, it’s definitely an exciting time to be in education when we have a chance to reenvision what schools have looked like for many years,” she said. “We want to capitalize on what we’ve learned.”

Further reading

Why are some kids thriving during remote learning? Fleming, N., Edutopia, 2020

Remote learning has been a disaster for many students. But some kids have thrived. Gilman, A., The Washington Post , Oct. 3, 2020

A preliminary examination of key strategies, challenges, and benefits of remote learning expressed by parents during the COVID-19 pandemic Roy, A., et al., School Psychology , in press

Remote learning during COVID-19: Examining school practices, service continuation, and difficulties for adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Becker S. P., et al., Journal of Adolescent Health , 2020

Recommended Reading

Contact apa, you may also like.

A Systematic Review of the Research Topics in Online Learning During COVID-19: Documenting the Sudden Shift

• Min Young Doo Kangwon National University http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-2159
• Meina Zhu Wayne State University
• Curtis J. Bonk Indiana University Bloomington

Since most schools and learners had no choice but to learn online during the pandemic, online learning became the mainstream learning mode rather than a substitute for traditional face-to-face learning. Given this enormous change in online learning, we conducted a systematic review of 191 of the most recent online learning studies published during the COVID-19 era. The systematic review results indicated that the themes regarding “courses and instructors” became popular during the pandemic, whereas most online learning research has focused on “learners” pre-COVID-19. Notably, the research topics “course and instructors” and “course technology” received more attention than prior to COVID-19. We found that “engagement” remained the most common research theme even after the pandemic. New research topics included parents, technology acceptance or adoption of online learning, and learners’ and instructors’ perceptions of online learning.

An, H., Mongillo, G., Sung, W., & Fuentes, D. (2022). Factors affecting online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: The lived experiences of parents, teachers, and administrators in U.S. high-needs K-12 schools. The Journal of Online Learning Research (JOLR), 8(2), 203-234. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/220404/

Aslan, S., Li, Q., Bonk, C. J., & Nachman, L. (2022). An overnight educational transformation: How did the pandemic turn early childhood education upside down? Online Learning, 26(2), 52-77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i2.2748

Azizan, S. N., Lee, A. S. H., Crosling, G., Atherton, G., Arulanandam, B. V., Lee, C. E., &

Abdul Rahim, R. B. (2022). Online learning and COVID-19 in higher education: The value of IT models in assessing students’ satisfaction. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(3), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.24871

Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design (1st ed.). EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex

Berge, Z., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08923640109527090

Bond, M. (2020). Schools and emergency remote education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A living rapid systematic review. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 191-247. http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/517

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Bonk, C. J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: Synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing.

Bonk, C. J., Olson, T., Wisher, R. A., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 97-118.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rance, N. (2014). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In A. Vossler & N. Moller (Eds.), The counselling & psychotherapy research handbook, 183–197. Sage.

Canales-Romero, D., & Hachfeld, A (2021). Juggling school and work from home: Results from a survey on German families with school-aged children during the early COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734257

Cao, Y., Zhang, S., Chan, M.C.E., Kang. Y. (2021). Post-pandemic reflections: lessons from Chinese mathematics teachers about online mathematics instruction. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09694-w

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, May 4). COVID-19 forecasts: Deaths. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/forecasting/forecasting-us.html

Chang, H. M, & Kim. H. J. (2021). Predicting the pass probability of secondary school students taking online classes. Computers & Education, 164, 104110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104110

Charumilind, S. Craven, M., Lamb, J., Sabow, A., Singhal, S., & Wilson, M. (2022, March 1). When will the COVID-19 pandemic end? McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/when-will-the-covid-19-pandemic-end

Cooper, H. (1988). The structure of knowledge synthesis: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104–126.

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. (2021). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K‐12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1554-1575. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13114

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Erwin, B. (2021, November). A policymaker’s guide to virtual schools. Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Policymakers-Guide-to-Virtual-Schools.pdf

Gross, B. (2021). Surging enrollment in virtual schools during the pandemic spurs new questions for policymakers. Center on Reinventing Public Education, Arizona State University. https://crpe.org/surging-enrollment-in-virtual-schools-during-the-pandemic-spurs-new-questions-for-policymakers/

Hamaidi, D. D. A., Arouri, D. Y. M., Noufal, R. K., & Aldrou, I. T. (2021). Parents’ perceptions of their children’s experiences with distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 224-241. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5154

Heo, H., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2022). Influences of depression, self-efficacy, and resource management on learning engagement in blended learning during COVID-19. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100856

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The differences between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teachingand-online-learning

Huang, L. & Zhang, T. (2021). Perceived social support, psychological capital, and subjective well-being among college students in the context of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00608-3

Kanwar, A., & Daniel, J. (2020). Report to Commonwealth education ministers: From response to resilience. Commonwealth of Learning. http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/3592

Lederman, D. (2019). Online enrollments grow, but pace slows. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2019/12/11/more-students-study-online-rate-growth-slowed-2018

Lee, K. (2019). Rewriting a history of open universities: (Hi)stories of distance teachers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.4070

Liu, Y., & Butzlaff, A. (2021). Where's the germs? The effects of using virtual reality on nursing students' hospital infection prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1622–1628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12601

Maloney, E. J., & Kim, J. (2020, June 10). Learning in 2050. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/learning-innovation/learning-2050

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009.

Miks, J., & McIlwaine, J. (2020, April 20). Keeping the world’s children learning through COVID-19. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/coronavirus/keeping-worlds-children-learning-through-covid-19

Mishra, S., Sahoo, S., & Pandey, S. (2021). Research trends in online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Distance Education, 42(4), 494-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986373

Moore, M. G. (Ed.) (2007). The handbook of distance education (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.

Munir, F., Anwar, A., & Kee, D. M. H. (2021). The online learning and students’ fear of COVID-19: Study in Malaysia and Pakistan. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5637

National Center for Education Statistics (2015). Number of virtual schools by state and school type, magnet status, charter status, and shared-time status: School year 2013–14. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/tables/201314_Virtual_Schools_table_1.asp

National Center for Education Statistics (2020). Number of virtual schools by state and school type, magnet status, charter status, and shared-time status: School year 2018–19. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/tables/201819_Virtual_Schools_table_1.asp

National Center for Education Statistics (2021). Number of virtual schools by state and school type, magnet status, charter status, and shared-time status: School year 2019–20. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/tables/201920_Virtual_Schools_table_1.asp

Nguyen T., Netto, C.L.M., Wilkins, J.F., Bröker, P., Vargas, E.E., Sealfon, C.D., Puthipiroj, P., Li, K.S., Bowler, J.E., Hinson, H.R., Pujar, M. & Stein, G.M. (2021). Insights into students’ experiences and perceptions of remote learning methods: From the COVID-19 pandemic to best practice for the future. Frontiers in Education, 6, 647986. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.647986

Oinas, S., Hotulainen, R., Koivuhovi, S., Brunila, K., & Vainikainen, M-P. (2022). Remote learning experiences of girls, boys and non-binary students. Computers & Education, 183, [104499]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104499

Park, A. (2022, April 29). The U.S. is in a 'Controlled Pandemic' Phase of COVID-19. But what does that mean? Time. https://time.com/6172048/covid-19-controlled-pandemic-endemic/

Petersen, G. B. L., Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers & Education, 179, 104429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429

Picciano, A., Dziuban, C., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.) (2014). Blended learning: Research perspectives, Volume 2. Routledge.

Picciano, A., Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R. & Moskal, P. (Eds.) (2022). Blended learning: Research perspectives, Volume 3. Routledge.

Pollard, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Mentoring graduate students online: Strategies and challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5093

Salis-Pilco, S. Z., Yang. Y., Zhang. Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190

Shen, Y. W., Reynolds, T. H., Bonk, C. J., & Brush, T. A. (2013). A case study of applying blended learning in an accelerated post-baccalaureate teacher education program. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 6(1), 59-78.

Seabra, F., Teixeira, A., Abelha, M., Aires, L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and learning in Portugal: Preschool to secondary school teachers’ perceptions. Education Sciences, 11, 349. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci11070349

Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093 .

Theirworld. (2020, March 20). Hundreds of millions of students now learning from home after coronavirus crisis shuts their schools. ReliefWeb. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/hundreds-millions-students-now-learning-home-after-coronavirus-crisis-shuts-their

UNESCO (2020). UNESCO rallies international organizations, civil society and private sector partners in a broad Coalition to ensure #LearningNeverStops. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-rallies-international-organizations-civil-society-and-private-sector-partners-broad

VanLeeuwen, C. A., Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Belikov, O. (2021). Never-ending repetitiveness, sadness, loss, and “juggling with a blindfold on:” Lived experiences of Canadian college and university faculty members during the COVID-19

pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 1306-1322

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13065

Wedemeyer, C. A. (1981). Learning at the back door: Reflections on non-traditional learning in the lifespan. University of Wisconsin Press.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 30. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741

Zhan, Z., Li, Y., Yuan, X., & Chen, Q. (2021). To be or not to be: Parents’ willingness to send their children back to school after the COVID-19 outbreak. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00610-9

As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.

Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

The DOAJ Seal is awarded to journals that demonstrate best practice in open access publishing

OLC Membership

OLC Research Center

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Advertisement

Distance education research: a review of the literature

• Published: 12 April 2011
• Volume 23 , pages 124–142, ( 2011 )

Cite this article

• Michael Simonson 1 ,
• Charles Schlosser 1 &
• Anymir Orellana 1  

5613 Accesses

94 Citations

Explore all metrics

Distance education is defined, the various approaches for effective research are summarized, and the results of major research reviews of the field are explained in this article. Additionally, two major areas of research are included—research on barriers to the adoption of distance education and research summaries that explain and support best practices in the field. This paper concludes with the summary statement that it is not different education, it is distance education ; what is known about effectiveness in education is most often also applicable to distance education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Distance Education and Technology Infrastructure: Strategies and Opportunities

Classic Theories of Distance Education

Adams, E., & Freeman, C. (2003). Selecting tools for online communities: Suggestions for learning technologists. The Technology Source. Available online at http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show+article&id=994 .

Berg, G. A. (2001). Distance learning best practices debate. WebNet Journal , 5–7 .

Berge, Z., & Muilenburg, L. (2000). Barriers to distance education as perceived by managers and administrators: Results of a survey. In M. Clay (Ed.), Distance learning administration annual 2000 . Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland.

Google Scholar  

Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Chen, B. (2009). Barriers to adoption of technology-mediated distance education in higher-education institutions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10 (4), 333–338.

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53 (4), 445–459.

Finn, J. (1953). Professionalizing the audiovisual field. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 1 (1), 6–17.

Foley, M. (2003). The global development learning network: A World Bank initiative in distance learning for development. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Foreman, J. (2003). Distance learning and synchronous interaction. The Technology Source. Available online at http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show+article&id=1042 .

Garon, J. (2002). A new future for distance education. Interface Tech News. Available online at http://www.interfacenow.com/syndicatepro/displayarticle.asp?ArticleID=180 .

Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Lim, B-R., Craner, J., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses. The Technology Source. Available online at http://technologysource.org/article/seven_principles_of_effective_teaching/ .

Hanna, D. E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials for Web-based education . Madison, WI: Atwood.

Hirumi, A. (2000). Chronicling the challenges of web-basing a degree program: A systems perspective. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1 (2), 89–108.

Hirumi, A. (2005). In search of quality: An analysis of e-learning guidelines and specifications. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6 (4), 209–330.

Holmberg, B. (1987). The development of distance education research. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1 (3), 16–23.

Article   Google Scholar  

Howell, S., & Baker, K. (2006). Good (best) practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs: A ten-year retrospect. Distance Learning, 3 (1), 41–47.

Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching online: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Kulik, C., Bangert, R., & Williams, G. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 , 19–26.

Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Cohen, P. (1979). Research on audio-tutorial instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Research in Higher Education, 11 (4), 321–341.

Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Cohen, P. (1980). Instructional technology and college teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 7 (4), 199–205.

Lou, Y., Bernard, R., & Abrami, P. (2006). Undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of the literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54 (2), 141–176.

Moore, M. G. (1998). Introduction. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes . Madison, WI: Atwood.

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Orellana, A., Hudgins, T., & Simonson, M. (2009). The perfect online course . Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education: Pedagogical analyses and interpretations in an international perspective . London: Kogan Page.

Peters, O. (2002). Distance education in transition: New trends and challenges. Bibliotheks- und Informations sytem der Universitat Oldenburg.

Ronsisvalle, T., & Watkins, R. (2005). Student success in online K-12 education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6 (2), 117–124.

Schlosser, C., & Burmeister, M. (1999). The best of both worlds. TechTrends, 43 (5), 45–48.

Schlosser, L. A., & Simonson, M. (2009). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (3rd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Simonson, M. (2000). Myths and distance education: What the research says and does not say. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1 (4), 277–279.

Simonson, M. (2001). Connecting the schools: Final evaluation report . North Miami Beach, FL: Nova Southeastern University. Available online at http://www.tresystems.com/projects/sdakota.cfgm .

Simonson, M. (2009a). Distance learning. In The 2009 book of the year (p. 231). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Simonson, M. (2009b). Scientific rigor. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10 (4), vii–viii.

Simonson, M. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of Distance Education. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Sloan, C. (2002). Practice: Comparing the cost - effectiveness of online versus traditional classroom cost per student pass rates . Available online at http://www.aln.org/effective/details5.asp?CE_ID=21 .

Smith, B., Benne, K., Stanley, W., & Anderson, A. (1951). Readings in the social aspects of education . Danville, IL: Interstate.

Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. (2000). Perception versus reality: Views of interaction in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1 (1), 45–58.

Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. (2004). Learning online: Adapting the seven principles of good practice to a web-based instructional environment. Distance Learning, 1 (1), 7–17.

Tallent-Runnels, M., Cooper, S., Lan, W., Thomas, J., & Busby, C. (2005). How to teach online: What the research says. Distance Learning, 2 (1), 21–34.

Tallent-Runnels, M., Thomas, J., Lan, W., Cooper, S., Ahern, T., Shaw, S., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76 (1), 93–135.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2009). Evaluation of evidence — based practices in online learning: A meta - analysis and review of online learning studies . Washington, DC. ( www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd?ppss?reports.html ).

Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education: A Delphi study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10 (3).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Fischler School of Education and Human Services, Nova Southeastern University, 1750 NE 167th Street, North Miami Beach, FL, 33162, USA

Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser & Anymir Orellana

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Simonson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Simonson, M., Schlosser, C. & Orellana, A. Distance education research: a review of the literature. J Comput High Educ 23 , 124–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9045-8

Download citation

Published : 12 April 2011

Issue Date : December 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9045-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Distance education
• Literature review
• Equivalency theory
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A rapid transition from campus to emergent distant education; effects on students’ study strategies in higher education.

1. Introduction

3. previous research, 3.1. distance education, 3.2. study strategies, 4.1. identification.

• “COVID-19” or “corona (SARS)” and “higher education”,
• “COVID-19” and “learning strategies” or “study strategies” and “higher education”, and
• “COVID-19” and “higher education” or “university” and “students”.
• A focus on higher education students’ distance learning;
• Higher education students’ study and learning strategies in distance learning.

4.2. Eligibility

• Were about the attitudes of students other than those in higher education;
• Focused on teachers’ attitudes towards distance education;
• Did not focus on study or learning strategies.

4.3. Data Analysis

4.4. validity and reliability, 5.1. contextual level of analysis, 5.2. distribution of themes, 5.3. students’ study strategies, 5.4. specific strategies during the pandemic, 6. discussion, 6.1. study strategies, 6.2. changing conditions, 6.3. implications, author contributions, conflicts of interest, appendix a. reviewed articles.

• Abou-Khalil, V.; Helou, S.; Khalifé, E.; Chen, M.; Majumdar, R.; Ogata, H. Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Educ. Sci.   2021 , 11 , 24, doi:10.3390/educsci11010024.
• Akcil, U.; Bastas, M. Examination of University Students’ Attitudes towards E-learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Process and the Relationship of Digital Citizenship. Contemp. Educ. Technol.   2020 , 13 , ep291, doi:10.30935/cedtech/9341.
• Agasisti, T.; Soncin, M. Higher education in troubled times: on the impact of Covid-19 in Italy. Stud. High. Educ.   2021 , 46 , 86–95, doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1859689.
• Aktan, S. Waking up to the dawn of a new era: Reconceptualization of curriculum post Covid-19. Prospect.   2021 , 1–13, doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09529-3.
• Aristovnik, A.; Keržič, D.; Ravšelj, D.; Tomaževič, N.; Umek, L. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective. Sustainability   2020 , 12 , 8438, doi:10.3390/su12208438.
• Balam, E. Learning Strategies and Motivation of Graduate Students: Is Gender a Factor? Inst. Learn. Styles J. 2015 , 1–9.
• Barnard-Brak, L.; Paton, V.O.; Lan, W.Y. Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn.   2010 , 11 , 61–80, doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769.
• Bassilli, J. Motivation and Cognitive Strategies in the Choice to Attend Lectures or Watch them Online. J. Distance Educ. 2008 , 22 , 129–148.
• Boström, L.; Coburn, A. To be conformative or not—A question of style or education? A comparative Study of Teacher Students in Sweden and Community Educatiosn Students in Scotland. Scott. Educ. Rev. 2013 , 45 , 64–77.
• Boström, L.; Löfqvist, S. Students Study Results, A Question of Styles, Strategies, or (mis) Matching. J. Stud. Educ. 2013 , 2 , 79–97, doi:10.5296/jse.v2j4.2410.
• Carnwell, R. Approaches to Study and their Impact on the Need for Support and Guidance in Distance Learning. Open Learn. J. Open Distance e-Learning   2000 , 15 , 123–140, doi:10.1080/713688399.
• Carrillo, C.; Flores, M.A. COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. Eur. J. Teach. Educ.   2020 , 43 , 466–487, doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184.
• Cho, M.-H.; Shen, D. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Educ.   2013 , 34 , 290–301, doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835770.
• Day, T.; Chang, I.-C.C.; Chung, C.K.L.; Doolittle, W.E.; Housel, J.; McDaniel, P.N. The Immediate Impact of COVID-19 on Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. Prof. Geogr.   2021 , 73 , 1–13, doi:10.1080/00330124.2020.1823864.
• De Boer, H. COVID-19 in Dutch higher education. Stud. High. Educ.   2021 , 46 , 96–106, doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1859684.
• Deshmukh, J. Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus—A global inquiry. Archnet-IJAR: Int. J. Arch. Res.   2021 , 15 , 131–147, doi:10.1108/arch-10-2020-0245.
• Dodd, R.; Dadaczynski, K.; Okan, O.; McCaffery, K.; Pickles, K. Psychological Wellbeing and Academic Experience of University Students in Australia during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal.   2021 , 18 , 866, doi:10.3390/ijerph18030866.
• Eringfeld, S. Higher education and its post-coronial future: utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge University during Covid-19. Stud. High. Educ.   2021 , 46 , 146–157, doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681.
• Gelles, L.A.; Lord, S.M.; Hoople, G.D.; Chen, D.A.; Mejia, J.A. Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote Teaching in an Integrated Engineering Energy Course during COVID-19. Educ. Sci.   2020 , 10 , 304, doi:10.3390/educsci10110304.
• Hamdan, K.M.; Al-Bashaireh, A.M.; Zahran, Z.; Al-Daghestani, A.; Al-Habashneh, S.; Shaheen, A.M. University students’ interaction, Internet self-efficacy, self-regulation and satisfaction with online education during pandemic crises of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). Int. J. Educ. Manag.   2021 , 35 , 713–725, doi:10.1108/ijem-11-2020-0513.
• Hobson, T.D.; Puruhito, K.K. Going the Distance - Online Course Performance and Motivation of Distance-Learning Students. Online Learn.   2018 , 22 , 129–140, doi:10.24059/olj.v22i4.1516.
• Hu, H.; Gramling, J. Learnings strategies for success in a web-based course. A Descr. Explor. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2009 , 10 , 123–134.
• Jacques, S.; Ouahabi, A.; Lequeu, T. Remote Knowledge Acquisition and Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. (IJEP)   2020 , 10 , 120–138, doi:10.3991/ijep.v10i6.16205.
• Kee, C.E. [ 68 ] The impact of COVID-19: Graduate students’ emotional and psychological experiences. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ.   2021 , 31 , 476–488, doi:10.1080/10911359.2020.1855285.
• Knowles, E.; Kerkman, D. An Investigation of Students Attitude and Motivation toward Online Learning. Stud. Motiv. 2007 , 2 , 70–80.
• Marek, M.W.; Chew, C.S.; Wu, W.-C.V. Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol.   2021 , 19 , 89–109, doi:10.4018/ijdet.20210101.oa3.
• Martín, C.T.; Acal, C.; El Homrani, M.; Estrada, Ángel M. Impact on the Virtual Learning Environment Due to COVID-19. Sustain.   2021 , 13 , 582, doi:10.3390/su13020582.
• Martínez, C.D.A. Developing metacognition at a distance: sharing students’ learning strategies on a reflective blog. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn.   2012 , 25 , 199–212, doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.636056.
• Mickwitz, Åsa ”Mer handledning och feedback hade varit bra.” Högre utbildning   2017 , 7 , 43–55, doi:10.23865/hu.v7.915.
• Park, S.; Yun, H. Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning in distance education courses. Distance Educ.   2017 , 38 , 302–320, doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369007.
• Peck, L.; Stefaniak, J.; Shah, S. The correlation of self-regulation and motivation with retention and attrition in distance education. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2018 , 19 , 1–15.
• Roman, T.A.; Callison, M.; Myers, R.D.; Berry, A.H. Facilitating Authentic Learning Experiences in Distance Education: Embedding Research-Based Practices into an Online Peer Feedback Tool. TechTrends   2020 , 64 , 591–605, doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00496-2.
• Ruffing, S.; Wach, F.-S.; Spinath, F.M.; Brünken, R.; Karbach, J. Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender- specific academic achievement. Front. Psychol.   2015 , 6 , doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01238.
• Schumacher, C.; Ifenthaler, D. Investigating prompts for supporting students’ self-regulation—A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches? Internet High. Educ.   2021 , 49 , 100791, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791.
• Skulmowski, A.; Rey, G.D. COVID-19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: Establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol.   2020 , 2 , 212–216, doi:10.1002/hbe2.201.
• Sæle, R.G.; Sørlie, T.; Dahl, T.I.; Friborg, O. Relationships between learning approach, procrastination and academic achievement amongst first-year university students. High. Educ.   2016 , 74 , 757–774, doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0075-z.
• Simunich, B.; Robins, D.B.; Kelly, V. The Impact of Findability on Student Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Perceptions of Online Course Quality. Am. J. Distance Educ.   2015 , 29 , 174–185, doi:10.1080/08923647.2015.1058604.
• Sizoo, S.; Malhotra, N.K.; Bearson, J.M. Preparing Students for a Distance Learning Environment: A Comparison of Learning Strategies of in-Class and Distance Learners. J. Educ. Technol. Syst.   2003 , 31 , 261–273, doi:10.2190/01wu-9dmf-2xvn-7wyu.
• Song, Y.; Vermunt, J.D. A comparative study of learning patterns of secondary school, high school and college students. Stud. Educ. Evaluation   2021 , 68 , 100958, doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100958.
• Tejedor, S.; Cervi, L.; Pérez-Escoda, A.; Tusa, F.; Parola, A. Higher Education Response in the Time of Coronavirus: Perceptions of Teachers and Students, and Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex.   2021 , 7 , 43, doi:10.3390/joitmc7010043.
• Todri, A.; Papajorgji, P.; Moskowitz, H.; Scalera, F. Perceptions regarding Distance Learning in Higher Education, Smoothing the Transition. Contemp. Educ. Technol.   2020 , 13 , ep287, doi:10.30935/cedtech/9274.
• Wang, C.-H.; Shannon, D.M.; Ross, M.E. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Educ.   2013 , 34 , 302–323, doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.
• Wang, Y.; Peng, H.; Huang, R.; Hou, Y.; Wang, J. Characteristics of distance learners: research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open Learn. J. Open Distance e-Learning   2008 , 23 , 17–28, doi:10.1080/02680510701815277.
• Yip, M.C. Differences between high and low academic achieving university students in learning and study strategies: a further investigation. Educ. Res. Evaluation   2009 , 15 , 561–570, doi:10.1080/13803610903354718.
• Zhu, X.; Chen, B.; Avadhanam, R.M.; Shui, H.; Zhang, R.Z. Reading and connecting: using social annotation in online classes. Inf. Learn. Sci.   2020 , 121 , 261–271, doi:10.1108/ils-04-2020-0117.
• Öhrstedt, M. Högskolestudenters lärande. Ett lärstrategiskt perspektiv på studier i psykologi. [University students’ learning. A learning strategic perspective on studies in psychology]. Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2017
• Zawacki-Richter, O.; Naidu, S. Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in Distance Education. Distance Educ. 2016 , 37 , 245–269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Durak, G.; Çankaya, S. Emergency Distance Education Process from the Perspectives of Academicians. Asian J. Distance Educ. 2020 , 15 , 159–174. [ Google Scholar ]
• Aktan, S. Waking up to the dawn of a new era: Reconceptualization of curriculum post Covid-19. Prospects 2021 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC); Gourlay, L.; Rodríguez-Illera, J.L.; Barberà, E.; Bali, M.; Gachago, D.; Pallitt, N.; Jones, C.; Bayne, S.; Hansen, S.B.; et al. Networked Learning in 2021: A Community Definition. Postdigital Sci. Educ. 2021 , 3 , 326–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Högskoleverket. Kartläggning av distansverksamheten vid universitet och högskolor [Mapping the distance operations at universities and colleges]. Rapport 2011 , 2011 , 2. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hrastinski, S. Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educ. Q. 2008 , 31 , 51–55. [ Google Scholar ]
• Palvia, S.; Aeron, P.; Gupta, P.; Mahapatra, D.; Parida, R.; Rosner, R.; Sindhi, S. Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2018 , 21 , 233–241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Sizoo, S.; Malhotra, N.K.; Bearson, J.M. Preparing Students for a Distance Learning Environment: A Comparison of Learning Strategies of in-Class and Distance Learners. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2003 , 31 , 261–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, C.-H.; Shannon, D.M.; Ross, M.E. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Educ. 2013 , 34 , 302–323. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marek, M.W.; Chew, C.S.; Wu, W.-C.V. Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 2021 , 19 , 89–109. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gee, J.P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. ACM Comput. Entertain. 2003 , 1 , 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kreber, C. What’s it really all about? The scholarship of teaching and learning as an authentic practice. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. 2007 , 1 , 1–4. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boström, L.; Coburn, A. To be conformative or not—A question of style or education? A comparative study of teacher students in Sweden and community education students in Scotland. Scott. Educ. Rev. 2013 , 45 , 64–77. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wittrock, M.C. A Constructive Review of Research on Learning Strategies. In Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation ; Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., Alexander, P.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• McKeachie, W.J. The need for study strategies training. In Learning and study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation ; Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., Alexander, P.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mayer, R.E. Learning strategies: An overview. In Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation ; Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E.T., Alexander, P.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marshall, D.; Summer, M.; Woolnough, B. Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. High. Educ. 1999 , 38 , 291–309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Marton, F.; Dall’Alba, G.; Beaty, E. Conceptions of learning. Int. J. Educ. Res. 1993 , 19 , 277–300. [ Google Scholar ]
• Purdie, N.; Hattie, J. Assessing students’ conceptions of learning. Aust. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 2002 , 2 , 17–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hellertz, P. Kvinnors Kunskapssyn och Lärandestrategier. En Studie av Tjugosju Kvinnliga Socionomstuderande [Women’s View of Knowledge and Learning Strategies. A Study of Twenty-Seven Female Sociology Students] ; Örebro Universitet, Institutionen för Socialt Arbete: Örebro, Sweden, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oxford, R. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know ; Newbury House: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Mally, J.M.; Chamot, A. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schmeck, R.R. An introduction to strategies and styles of learning. In Learning Strategies and Learning Style ; Schmeck, R.R., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 3–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pleijel, R. “Ytinlärning och djupinlärning—En kritisk reflektion kring normativa tolkningar av begrepp i den samtida högskolepedagogiska diskursen” [Surface learning and depth learning—A critical reflection on normative interpretations of terms in the contemporary college educational discourse]. Högre Utbild. 2021 , 11 , 16–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elmgren, M.; Henriksson, A.-S. Universitets Pedagogik [University Pedagogics] ; Norstedts: Stockholm, Sweden, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Coffield, F.; Moseley, D.; Hall, E.; Ecclestone, K. Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post 16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review ; Learning and Skills Research Centre: London, UK, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Riding, R.; Rayner, S. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behavior ; David Fulton: London, UK, 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hård af Segerstad, H.; Klasson, U.; Tebelius, U. Vuxenpedagogik—Att Iscensätta Vuxnas Lärande [Adult Pedagogy—To Engineering Adult Learning] ; Studentlitteratur: Lund, Sweden, 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Evans, C.; Cools, E.; Charlesworth, Z. Learning in higher education—How cognitive and learning styles matter. Teach. High. Educ. 2010 , 15 , 467–478. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rogowsky, B.A.; Calhoun, B.M.; Tallal, P. Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 2015 , 107 , 64–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Entwistle, N. Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes 2001 , 5–6 , 593–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zimmerman, B.J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educ. Psychol. 1990 , 25 , 3–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zimmerman, B.J. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation ; Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 13–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rovers, S.F.E.; Stalmeijer, R.E.; van Merriënboer, J.J.G.; Savelberg, H.H.C.M.; de Bruin, A.B.H. How and why do students use learning strategies? A mixed methods study on learning strategies and desirable difficulties with effective strategy users. Front. Psychol. 2018 , 9 , 2501. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fink, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews. From the Internet to Paper , 5th ed.; SAGE Publications: Sauzend Oaks, CA, USA, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• PRISMA. PRISMA 2020 Statement Articl. 2020. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/ (accessed on 15 April 2021).
• Boaz, A.; Sidford, A. Reviewing existing research. In From Postgraduate to Social Scientist ; Nigel, G., Ed.; Sage Research Methods Database: London, UK, 2006; pp. 7–24. [ Google Scholar ]
• Major, C.H.; Savin-Baden, M. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in social Science Research ; Routledge: London, UK, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006 , 3 , 77–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Booth, A.; Sutton, A.; Papaioannou, D. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review , 2nd ed.; Sage: Sauzend Oaks, CA, USA, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Krispendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 4th ed.; Sage: Sauzend Oaks, CA, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barnard-Brak, L.; Lan, W.; Paton, V. Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2010 , 11 , 61–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Park, S.; Yun, H. Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning in distance education courses. Distance Educ. 2017 , 38 , 302–320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bandura, A. Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Dev. Psychol. 1989 , 25 , 729–735. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Peck, L.; Stefaniak, J.; Shah, S. The correlation of self-regulation and motivation with retention and attrition in distance education. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2018 , 19 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ]
• Simunuch, B.; Robins, D.; Kelly, V. The impact of findability on student motivation, self-efficacy, and perceptions of online course quality. Am. J. Distance Educ. 2015 , 29 , 174–185. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ruffing, S.; Wach, S.; Spinath, F.; Brunchen, R.; Karbach, J. Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender-specific academic achievement. Front. Psychol. 2015 , 6 , 1238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Hu, H.; Gramling, J. Learnings strategies for success in a web-based course: A descriptive exploration. Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 2009 , 10 , 123–134. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yip, C.W. Differences between high and low academic achieving university students in learning and study strategies: A further investigation. Educ. Res. Eval. 2009 , 15 , 561–572. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cho, M.-H.; Shen, D. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education 2013 , 34 , 230–301. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Knowles, E.; Kerkman, D. An investigation of students’ attitude and motivation toward online learning. Stud. Moti Vation 2007 , 2 , 70–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dodd, R.; Dadaczynski, K.; Okan, O.; McCaffery, K.; Pickles, K. Psychological wellbeing and academic experience of university students in Australia during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 18 , 866. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michwitz, Å. “Mer handledning och feedback hade varit bra.” E studie om studenternas självreglering på en kurs i skrivande enligt modellen för självständigt lärande. [“More guidance and feedback would have been good.”A study of students’ self-regulation on a course in writing according to the model for independent learning]. Högre Utbild. 2017 , 7 , 43–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Öhrstedt, M. Högskolestudenters Lärande. Ett Lärstrategiskt Perspektiv på Studier i Psykologi [College students’ Learning. A Learning Strategic Perspective on Studies in Psychology] [Diss] ; Stockholms University: Stockholms, Sweden, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, Y.; Peng, H.; Huang, R.; Hou, Y.; Wang, J. Characteristics of distance learners: Research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open Learn. 2008 , 23 , 17–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sæle, R.; Dahl, T.; Sørli, T.; Friborg, O. Relationships between learning approach, procrastination and academic achievement amongst first-year university students. High. Educ. 2016 , 74 , 757–774. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Boström, L.; Löfqvist, S. Students study results: A question of styles, strategies, or (mis)matching. J. Stud. Educ. 2013 , 2 , 79–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Song, Y.; Vermunt, J. A comparative study of learning patterns of secondary school, high school and college students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 2021 , 68 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tejedor, S.; Cervi, L.; Perez-Escoda, A.; Tusa, F.; Parola, A. Higher education response in the time of coronavirus: Perceptions of teachers and students, and open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Compelxity 2021 , 7 , 43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Todri, A.; Papajorgi, P.; Moskiwitz, H.; Scalera, F. Perceptions regarding distance learning in higher education, smoothing the transition. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 2021 , 13 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martin, C.; Acal, C.; Honrani, M.; Estrada, A. Impact on the virtual learning environment due to COVID-19. Substainability 2021 , 13 , 582. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carrillo, C.; Flores, M. COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 2020 , 43 , 466–487. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Skulmowski, A.; Rey, G. COVID-19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: Establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020 , 1–5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hobson, T.; Puruhito, K. Going the distance: Online course performance and motivation of distance learning students. Online Learn. J. 2018 , 22 , 129–140. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Sveriges Förenade Studentkårer. Hur Påverkar Coronaepedemin Studenterna? En Sammanställning av 12 Enkätundersökningar Från Svenska Lärosäten [How Does the Coronaepedemia Affect the Students? A Summary of 12 Survey Studies from Swedish Universities]. Rapport. 2020. Dnr. 011-17/2021. Available online: https://sfs.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SFS-rapport-Hur-pa%CC%8Averkar-coronapandemin-studenterna-december-2020-2.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2020).
• Day, T.; Chang, I.; Chung, C.; Doolittle, W.; Housel, J.; McDaniel, P. The immediate impact of COVID-19 on postsecondary teaching and learning. Prof. Geogr. 2020 , 73 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deshmukh, J. Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus—A global inquiry. J. Archit. Res. 2020 , 1–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kee, C. The impact of COVID-19: Graduate students’ emotional and psychological experiences. J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2021 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Boström, L.; Collén, C.; Damber, U.; Gidlund, U. A Rapid Transition from Campus to Emergent Distant Education; Effects on Students’ Study Strategies in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2021 , 11 , 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110721

Boström L, Collén C, Damber U, Gidlund U. A Rapid Transition from Campus to Emergent Distant Education; Effects on Students’ Study Strategies in Higher Education. Education Sciences . 2021; 11(11):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110721

Boström, Lena, Charlotta Collén, Ulla Damber, and Ulrika Gidlund. 2021. "A Rapid Transition from Campus to Emergent Distant Education; Effects on Students’ Study Strategies in Higher Education" Education Sciences 11, no. 11: 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110721

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Fighting for fair school construction funding in California

What can colleges learn from the pro-Palestinian protesters’ deal at a UC campus?

Why California schools call the police

How earning a college degree put four California men on a path from prison to new lives | Documentary 

Patrick Acuña’s journey from prison to UC Irvine | Video

Family reunited after four years separated by Trump-era immigration policy

Calling the cops: Policing in California schools

Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay

Lessons in Higher Education: California and Beyond

Superintendents: Well paid and walking away

Keeping California public university options open

College in Prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life

May 14, 2024

Getting California kids to read: What will it take?

April 24, 2024

Is dual admission a solution to California’s broken transfer system?

Distance Learning

The coronavirus crisis has forced school districts, colleges and universities to shift to teaching and learning online. But distance learning poses myriad challenges in a state of 40 million people where many students still lack reliable access to the internet and the devices they need to succeed in online learning. Under this topic, you will find EdSource's stories exploring these challenges and strategies to overcome them.

Recently in this Topic

The california student journalism corps, roxane knorr, adam abolfazli, john fensterwald, search & filter within this topic.

Filter by Grade Level

Filter by Article Type

Search by Keywords

Coming to UCLA the second time was scarier - but was worth it

May 2, 2022.

The prospect of returning to UCLA for in-person classes after the pandemic was scary, but in the end, I found some of my worries were overblown.

Megan Tagami

La unified's independent study less chaotic, but parental complaints persist, february 7, 2022.

L.A. Unified parents say the district’s independent study program has improved from the fall, yet they remain frustrated with its format and curriculum.

Kate Sequeira

Legislature reaffirms quarantined students must be in independent study to be funded, september 13, 2021.

Some changes in the independent study law may help districts, but a teacher shortage remains the biggest obstacle to providing instruction.

Changes for educating quarantined California students proposed by governor, Legislature 

September 6, 2021.

State leaders recognize crisis some districts face but don't backtrack from applying independent study to students sidelined by delta variant.

What is independent study in California? | Quick Guide

August 26, 2021.

Independent study is this year's at-home alternative to in-person instruction for parents worried about contracting Covid. How will it work?

John Fensterwald And Sydney Johnson

Many small districts complain california shorted their funding during the pandemic, august 23, 2021.

Many small districts educated students who fled urban areas due to Covid, yet weren't compensated, with a big impact on their budgets.

As California schools reopen, will there be a surge in independent study?

August 9, 2021.

Families have a right to independent study instead of in-person instruction; worry about the delta variant may determine how many choose it.

California moves to adopt historic $6 billion broadband plan

July 15, 2021.

The bill will enable local governments and nonprofits to bypass private companies and build their own broadband infrastructure.

Sydney Johnson

California voters give schools and teachers top grades in year-end survey, july 8, 2021.

Were voters "grading on a curve" in recognition of hard work amid a pandemic? Polling also found growing tensions on race and politics.

California directs districts to offer remote independent study this fall

July 7, 2021.

The education trailer bill extends independent study to students whose health would be put at risk by in-person instruction.

Pandemic drives sharp rise in California families opening their own home schools

July 1, 2021.

Almost 35,000 California families filed a private school affidavit to home-school their children during the 2020-21 school year — more than double the number filed before the pandemic.

Diana Lambert

Grading changes, other covid accommodations await gov. newsom’s signature, june 24, 2021.

An extra year in high school, a Pass or No Pass option and minimum graduation requirements would help undo damage from the pandemic.

California schools move ahead with fall distance learning plans despite limitations

June 7, 2021.

Parents and education advocacy groups are urging Gov. Gavin Newsom to extend distance learning provisions for the upcoming school year.

Quick Guide: Where do things stand on in-person instruction in California?

May 18, 2021.

This guide provides answers to frequently asked questions about how California is moving forward with plans for reopening the state’s K-12 schools for full in-person instructions.

EdSource staff

Over half of california public school students remain in distance learning, may 5, 2021.

An EdSource analysis found far fewer low-income students have returned for in-person instruction and large variations by region.

Daniel J. Willis And John Fensterwald

Explore edsource.

State Education Policy

College & Careers

Student Well-Being

Edsource in your inbox.

Stay ahead of the latest developments on education in California and nationally from early childhood to college and beyond. Sign up for EdSource’s no-cost daily email.

95 Distance Education Essay Topics

Are you looking for the best distance learning essay topics? You’ve come to the right place! StudyCorgi has prepared plenty of research questions about online learning and e-learning ideas for essays and other writing assignments. Read on to get inspired!

🏆 Best Distance Learning Essay Topics

✍️ distance education essay topics for college, 🎓 most interesting online learning research topics, 💡 distance education research topics, ❓ research questions about online learning.

• Reasons Why Face-To-Face Education Is Better Than Online Learning
• Pros and Cons of Online Learning
• Online Learning vs. In-Person Learning
• Distance Learning: Advantages and Disadvantages
• Online Learning Technologies
• Distance Learning vs. The Traditional Classroom
• Traditional vs. Virtual Learning Environment
• Online Learning During the Pandemic When it comes to the notion of education, the process of online learning has become salvation to the problem of education access and efficiency.
• Online Classes: Computer Literacy and Knowledge The aim of the paper is to prove that educational establishments should change their policies to introduce online classes.
• Online Learning and Students’ Mental Health Mental health is an aspect that attracts significant attention from researchers interested in investigating the connection between the lack of social interactions.
• The Social Interaction in an Online Learning Community The modern online education needs adjustments related to the facilitation of independent learning, student collaboration, and minimization of the role of the teacher.
• Technology, Distance Education, and Its Quality This paper examines major issues associated with technology and distance learning and how they impact on the quality of education offered to learners.
• Why More and More Students Are Taking Online Classes? In the recent days, online learning has acquired a lot of popularity in many countries. Online enrollment is convenient to most students and many people opt to apply this strategy.
• Learning Methods: Online Learning Online learning takes place without the physical presence of the instructor. It is a structured learning which involves online teaching in absence of the instructor.
• Information Technology Enabled Online Learning This paper investigates on the aspect of Information Technology – enabled online learning and the relevant technologies that are utilized.
• Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of Distance Learning This paper will explore the question of the extent distance learning can be used as an effective tool for promoting equal educational opportunities.
• Learner Isolation in Distance Education Research demonstrates that distance education is the “magic bullet” in addressing nursing shortage issues and ensuring that nurses have the opportunity to advance their skills.
• Hidden Curriculum in Online Classes The hidden curriculum both for online and face-to-face classes specifies the necessity to obey rules, standards, and laws, listen to people who have more knowledge and experience.
• Past and Current Trends in Distance Education Distance learning has been evolving as time goes by and this means that there are certain trends that need to be looked at.
• Education Theory for Online Learning Teaching online entails the development of instructions for students and delivering them through technological gadgets.
• Distance Learning for Addressing Nurse Shortage Distance education could be embraced to teach more individuals and address the current predicament of the nursing shortage.
• Distance Learning and Social Change Distance learning can be defined as a form of education where learners can learn wherever they are through the use of technology.
• First Nations Pedagogy for Online Learning The paper represents the educational strategies that differ from the European approach and help to support Aboriginal students’ needs.
• Online Learning as an Integral Component of the Education System The essay will examine how online learning has become an integral component of the education system and the benefits it offers compared to the physical classroom model.
• The Benefits of Taking Online Classes The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted the majority of public and private sectors, including the education system.
• Analysis of Cultural Disconnect in Virtual Learning Environments There has been a cultural disconnect in learning environments in education. Language is the most significant contributor to cultural disconnect within the educational centers.
• Theories, Tools, and Principles of Online Learning Modern technology has changed education designs. Using a range of new communications and network tools it is easy to design an online education platform.
• Zines Distance Learning Education and Before You Go Magazine The review of zines Distance Learning Education and Before managed to underline their significance for the modern population in terms of their functions and characteristics.
• Online Learning and Education Course Reflections The course on online learning and the application of information technologies has demonstrated to me that educators should help students reduce extraneous processing.
• Adobe Connect GoToMeeting in Distance Learning The study has focused on the impacts of implementing Adobe Connect Gotomeeting in distance learning as a collaboration tool and its impact on instructions and learning.
• Open and Distance Education in India: In Which Direction Is the Wind Blowing in the 21st Century
• The Missing Borders: Pedagogical Reflections From Distance Education
• Zane Berge Viewpoint About the Future of Distance Education
• Tips for Managers Setting up a Distance Education Program
• Distance Education and Its Impact on the World
• Computer and Long Distance Education
• How Has Distance Education Changed the World of Education?
• Critical Thinking Distance Education and Traditional
• Technology and Teens Today: Neil Postman Distance Education
• Distance Education Investment Reasons
• Nursing and Distance Education
• Tertiary Distance Education Student Adjustment
• Distance Education and the Isolation of Rural Schools
• Assessing and Comparing Perceptions of Distance Education in the U.S. And Britain With Kazakhstan
• Theoretical Framework for Distance Education
• The Impact of Distance Education on the Process of Learning
• Distance Education for Students With Disabilities
• Financial Aid for Distance Education Students
• Time Management and Distance Education
• Good Critical Thinking About E-learning in Distance Education
• Distance Education for Adult Education and Self Enrichment Course
• Distance Education Student’s Experiences of Participation and Inclusion in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
• Critical Thinking Distance Education and Traditional Education
• Distance Education Can Help Poorer Countries
• Accreditation Need and Distance Education
• Distance Education and Telecommunications Technologies
• College Distance Education Courses: Evaluating Benefits
• Improving Distance Education Programs
• Learning Communities and Distance Education
• Distance Education, Leadership, and Management
• How Technology Will Evolve Through Distance Education?
• Distance Education: Definition and Glossary of Terms Assignment
• Factors Contributing Toward Student Performance in a Distance Education Accounting Degree
• Academic Success Factors: Distance Education Versus Traditional
• The Role of Student Support in Open Distance Learning
• Education and Distance Education in Apartheid South Africa
• Exploring Acceptance Towards Environmental Sustainability of Distance Education in Malaysia
• The Demand for Distance Education
• Michael Foleys Viewpoint About the Future of Distance Education
• Sir Daniel’s Viewpoint About Future Distance Education
• How Should Distance Learning Be Implemented?
• What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Distance Learning?
• How Is Technology Beneficial to the Learning Success of Students in Distance Education?
• Why Choose Distance Learning?
• What Are the Disadvantages of Modular Distance Learning?
• Is Distance Learning Effective for Students?
• What Are the Main Challenges Facing Students and Teachers During Distance Learning?
• How Can Distance Learning Challenges Be Overcome?
• Why Is Distance Learning Difficult for Students?
• Has the Internet Transformed Distance Education?
• What Are the Effects of Distance Learning on Students?
• Is Distance Learning as Effective as Face to Face?
• What Are the Challenges of Distance Learning During the Coronavirus Pandemic?
• How Has Distance Education Changed Teaching?
• Which Is Better Distance Learning or Online Learning?
• What Is the Impact of Distance Learning on Student Engagement in Learning?
• Does Distance Education Have Value?
• What Is the Scope of Distance Education?
• Is Distance Education Valid for Teaching?
• Can Distance Education Be a Good Alternative to Classroom Education?
• Will Distance Education Replace Classroom Courses in the Future?
• Why Is Distance Education More Relevant in the Modern Education System?
• How Has the Internet Contributed to the Field of Distance Education?
• Why Is There a Need for Distance Education Both in Developed and Underdeveloped Countries?
• How Is Technology Helpful in Providing Distance Education?

Cite this post

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, May 10). 95 Distance Education Essay Topics. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/distance-education-essay-topics/

"95 Distance Education Essay Topics." StudyCorgi , 10 May 2022, studycorgi.com/ideas/distance-education-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) '95 Distance Education Essay Topics'. 10 May.

1. StudyCorgi . "95 Distance Education Essay Topics." May 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/distance-education-essay-topics/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "95 Distance Education Essay Topics." May 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/distance-education-essay-topics/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "95 Distance Education Essay Topics." May 10, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/distance-education-essay-topics/.

These essay examples and topics on Distance Education were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They meet our highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, and fact accuracy. Please ensure you properly reference the materials if you’re using them to write your assignment.

This essay topic collection was updated on June 21, 2024 .

84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples

📝 distance education research papers examples, 🏆 best distance education essay titles, 🎓 simple research topics about distance education, ❓ distance education research questions.

• Efficient Interaction in Distance Learning Classroom Recent trends indicate that learners and instructors have regarded distance-learning classrooms as efficient methods of learning, where technology supports active learning.
• Distance Learning Replacing Traditional Classes Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic there have been many discussions surrounding the future of online education replacing the traditional form of education.
• Distance Learning Overview While remote learning has become more popular due to developing technology and the necessity to keep the distance, it is still a work in progress.
• Distance Learning Replacing Traditional Classes The article presents the author's reasoning on the topic of whether online learning can replace traditional education.
• The Class, Social Strata, and Social Mobility That Affect Students Education This portfolio examines the variety of issues connected to class and ethnicity that can obstruct children from obtaining an education.
• Should Distance Learning Replace Traditional Education Distance learning provides safety, flexibility, and the customization of the learning experience, it should not replace traditional education that ensures effective communication.
• Education at WGU School Review WGU is the type of school that will allow the author to progress at a pace that is most suitable to the author, which will allow him to become the best teacher that he can be.
• Distant Education or Traditional Education Essay aims to analyze and study both types of education to compare and highlight key features. The traditional method of teaching consists in full-time attendance at institution.
• Distance Learning in Saudi Arabia The benefits of distance learning have been known to the world as long as technological advancements made such learning possible.
• Distance Education: Term Definition New approaches to learning made it easier for people from all around the world to enter various educational facilities, do the courses, and gain the necessary knowledge.
• The Educational Efforts During the COVID-19 Pandemic The study discusses the effectiveness of the educational efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic as one of the most critical issues in contemporary education.
• Leading in a Distance Education Environment The traditional educational system curriculum differs from the distance education program. Many typical activities such as lecturing do not suit the online learning systems.
• Online Education in Canada Before Covid-19 Pandemic Online education was already an established concept in many nations, including Canada, before 2020 and the advent of COVID-19.
• Distance Education in Virtual High School Electronic, virtual, or distance education is a good alternative for students to learn topics that do not require discussion in real-time.
• Educational Adaptation and Responses to Pandemic The article researches the effects of the pandemic and subsequent quarantine measures on pupils’ performance and evaluates various solutions for the performance and grading issues.
• Distance Learning Can Substitute Face-to-Face Traditional Educational System in Wyoming Distance learning can replace the face-to-face traditional education K-12 system in Wyoming, and there are many benefits to this approach.
• Distance Learning for Students with High Behavioral Needs Tomaino et al.'s study on "assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of distance learning for students with DDBN” is framed around the theme of online learning.
• Distant Education as one of the Basic Rights The benefits of distance education are obvious as it helps students under certain circumstances be a part of the educational process in an environment that is no new anymore.
• Distance Learning During Covid-19 The study redefines the idea of distance learning and explores higher education distance learning supply in Canada, the US, and France using COVID-19 secondary data.
• Factors of Motivation of Distance Education Teachers are motivated to participate in Distance Education due to their ability to facilitate it as well as the freedom it provides; however, increased workload discourages them.
• Distance Learning: Advantages and Disadvantages The research paper aims to thoroughly analyze the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning compared to traditional in-person classes.
• Distance Education and Process of Accreditation This essay aims to determine the basic processes an educational institution must go through to accredit its distance programs.
• Distance Learning for Equal Education The paper discusses to what extent distance learning can be utilized as a powerful tool for improving equal educational opportunity, rather than as an inferior system.
• Lingering Effects of Covid on Education The Covid pandemic has impacted individuals from many areas of life on a national, economic, educational, and income level basis, among other things.
• K-12 Education Change in Educating Young People During the COVID-19 Pandemic This paper is an annotated bibliography of the articles devoted to the K-12 education change in light of the experience of educating young people during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Distance Learning in Kuwait as Response to COVID-19 The study examines how the concept of distance learning is implemented in Kuwait from educational and legal perspectives to promote its productive use during the Covid-19 pandemic.
• Impact of Electronic Learning on the Educational Performance The paper aims to investigate the influence of online learning on student academic achievements, emphasizing also mathematics courses.
• The Future of Distance Education: Trends and Innovations
• The Impact of Technology on Distance Education: Transforming the Learning Experience
• Exploring the Benefits of Distance Education for Students
• Debunking Myths About Distance Education
• The Rise of Distance Education
• Navigating the Challenges of Time Management in Distance Education
• The Role of Accreditation in Ensuring Quality in Distance Education Programs
• From Traditional to Virtual: Adapting Teaching Methods for Distance Education
• Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Distance Education Compared to Traditional Learning
• The Evolution of Distance Education
• Building Connections in Distance Education
• Exploring the Global Reach of Distance Education: Breaking Down Geographic Barriers
• Empowering Students with Disabilities through Inclusive Distance Education
• Essential Tools and Resources for Thriving in a Distance Education Environment
• Online Education or Distance Education
• The Role of Distance Education in the Modern Educational System
• The Importance of Discussions During Distance Learning
• The Advantages and Disadvantages of Distance Learning
• Understanding the Cognitive Aspects of Distance Education
• A Guide to Creating an Effective Study Space for Distance Learning
• The Impact of Distance Learning on Students
• Distance Learning as a Key to School Development
• Benefits of Remote Learning for Parents
• Disadvantages of Distance Learning
• Distance Learning Is One of the Fastest-Growing Models of Education
• Distance Education And The Evolution Of Online Learning
• Distance Education: Personal Experience
• It’s Not for Everyone: Distance Education
• Perceived Difficulties by the Distance Education
• School Distance Education: Meaning
• Use of Technologies for Distance Learning
• Convenience of Distance Learning in the Period of COVID-19
• Pass Grades Rise, but Real Learning Disappears: Distance Learning
• Relief for Parents When Their Children Are Studying Remotely
• In Distance Learning, It Is Much More Difficult to Make Acquaintances on the Course
• Many Students Copy Information From the Internet on Distance Learning: The Ethicality of the Issue
• The Issue of Real Interest in Learning: Distance Education
• How to Stay Motivated and Engaged in a Distance Education?
• What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Distance Learning?
• What Is the Concept of Open and Distance Education?
• What Are the Effects of Distance Learning?
• How Does Distance Education Affect Students Performance?
• What is Distance Learning?
• The Pros and Cons of Distance Learning: Is It Here to Stay?
• How to Build a Supportive Online Learning Community Distance Education?
• What Are Some of the Advantages of Attending College on Distance Education?
• What Teachers Should Know About Distance Learning?
• What Is Online School and How Does It Work?
• How to Write a Good Distance Learning Essay?
• How Not to Lose Communication Skills With Peers While on Distance Learning?
• How to Maintain an Emotional State While on Distance Learning?
• How to Develop Yourself, Studied Remotely?
• How Distance Learning Benefits Teaching?
• How Manage Your Time in Distance Learning?
• Can Parents Influence a Distance Learning Student?
• How to Learn Additionally on Your Own via Distance Learning?
• Is Distance Learning Beneficial?

Cite this page

Select style

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

ChalkyPapers. (2024, May 25). 84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples. https://chalkypapers.com/topics/distance-education-research-topics/

"84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples." ChalkyPapers , 25 May 2024, chalkypapers.com/topics/distance-education-research-topics/.

ChalkyPapers . (2024) '84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples'. 25 May.

ChalkyPapers . 2024. "84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples." May 25, 2024. https://chalkypapers.com/topics/distance-education-research-topics/.

1. ChalkyPapers . "84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples." May 25, 2024. https://chalkypapers.com/topics/distance-education-research-topics/.

Bibliography

ChalkyPapers . "84 Distance Education Research Topics & Essay Examples." May 25, 2024. https://chalkypapers.com/topics/distance-education-research-topics/.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection

A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018

Associated data.

Systematic reviews were conducted in the nineties and early 2000's on online learning research. However, there is no review examining the broader aspect of research themes in online learning in the last decade. This systematic review addresses this gap by examining 619 research articles on online learning published in twelve journals in the last decade. These studies were examined for publication trends and patterns, research themes, research methods, and research settings and compared with the research themes from the previous decades. While there has been a slight decrease in the number of studies on online learning in 2015 and 2016, it has then continued to increase in 2017 and 2018. The majority of the studies were quantitative in nature and were examined in higher education. Online learning research was categorized into twelve themes and a framework across learner, course and instructor, and organizational levels was developed. Online learner characteristics and online engagement were examined in a high number of studies and were consistent with three of the prior systematic reviews. However, there is still a need for more research on organization level topics such as leadership, policy, and management and access, culture, equity, inclusion, and ethics and also on online instructor characteristics.

• • Twelve online learning research themes were identified in 2009–2018.
• • A framework with learner, course and instructor, and organizational levels was used.
• • Online learner characteristics and engagement were the mostly examined themes.
• • The majority of the studies used quantitative research methods and in higher education.
• • There is a need for more research on organization level topics.

1. Introduction

Online learning has been on the increase in the last two decades. In the United States, though higher education enrollment has declined, online learning enrollment in public institutions has continued to increase ( Allen & Seaman, 2017 ), and so has the research on online learning. There have been review studies conducted on specific areas on online learning such as innovations in online learning strategies ( Davis et al., 2018 ), empirical MOOC literature ( Liyanagunawardena et al., 2013 ; Veletsianos & Shepherdson, 2016 ; Zhu et al., 2018 ), quality in online education ( Esfijani, 2018 ), accessibility in online higher education ( Lee, 2017 ), synchronous online learning ( Martin et al., 2017 ), K-12 preparation for online teaching ( Moore-Adams et al., 2016 ), polychronicity in online learning ( Capdeferro et al., 2014 ), meaningful learning research in elearning and online learning environments ( Tsai, Shen, & Chiang, 2013 ), problem-based learning in elearning and online learning environments ( Tsai & Chiang, 2013 ), asynchronous online discussions ( Thomas, 2013 ), self-regulated learning in online learning environments ( Tsai, Shen, & Fan, 2013 ), game-based learning in online learning environments ( Tsai & Fan, 2013 ), and online course dropout ( Lee & Choi, 2011 ). While there have been review studies conducted on specific online learning topics, very few studies have been conducted on the broader aspect of online learning examining research themes.

2. Systematic Reviews of Distance Education and Online Learning Research

Distance education has evolved from offline to online settings with the access to internet and COVID-19 has made online learning the common delivery method across the world. Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) reviewed research late 1990's to early 2000's, Berge and Mrozowski (2001) reviewed research 1990 to 1999, and Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) reviewed research in 2000–2008 on distance education and online learning. Table 1 shows the research themes from previous systematic reviews on online learning research. There are some themes that re-occur in the various reviews, and there are also new themes that emerge. Though there have been reviews conducted in the nineties and early 2000's, there is no review examining the broader aspect of research themes in online learning in the last decade. Hence, the need for this systematic review which informs the research themes in online learning from 2009 to 2018. In the following sections, we review these systematic review studies in detail.

Comparison of online learning research themes from previous studies.

2.1. Distance education research themes, 1990 to 1999 ( Berge & Mrozowski, 2001 )

Berge and Mrozowski (2001) reviewed 890 research articles and dissertation abstracts on distance education from 1990 to 1999. The four distance education journals chosen by the authors to represent distance education included, American Journal of Distance Education, Distance Education, Open Learning, and the Journal of Distance Education. This review overlapped in the dates of the Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) study. Berge and Mrozowski (2001) categorized the articles according to Sherry's (1996) ten themes of research issues in distance education: redefining roles of instructor and students, technologies used, issues of design, strategies to stimulate learning, learner characteristics and support, issues related to operating and policies and administration, access and equity, and costs and benefits.

In the Berge and Mrozowski (2001) study, more than 100 studies focused on each of the three themes: (1) design issues, (2) learner characteristics, and (3) strategies to increase interactivity and active learning. By design issues, the authors focused on instructional systems design and focused on topics such as content requirement, technical constraints, interactivity, and feedback. The next theme, strategies to increase interactivity and active learning, were closely related to design issues and focused on students’ modes of learning. Learner characteristics focused on accommodating various learning styles through customized instructional theory. Less than 50 studies focused on the three least examined themes: (1) cost-benefit tradeoffs, (2) equity and accessibility, and (3) learner support. Cost-benefit trade-offs focused on the implementation costs of distance education based on school characteristics. Equity and accessibility focused on the equity of access to distance education systems. Learner support included topics such as teacher to teacher support as well as teacher to student support.

2.2. Online learning research themes, 1993 to 2004 ( Tallent-Runnels et al., 2006 )

Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) reviewed research on online instruction from 1993 to 2004. They reviewed 76 articles focused on online learning by searching five databases, ERIC, PsycINFO, ContentFirst, Education Abstracts, and WilsonSelect. Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) categorized research into four themes, (1) course environment, (2) learners' outcomes, (3) learners’ characteristics, and (4) institutional and administrative factors. The first theme that the authors describe as course environment ( n  = 41, 53.9%) is an overarching theme that includes classroom culture, structural assistance, success factors, online interaction, and evaluation.

Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) for their second theme found that studies focused on questions involving the process of teaching and learning and methods to explore cognitive and affective learner outcomes ( n  = 29, 38.2%). The authors stated that they found the research designs flawed and lacked rigor. However, the literature comparing traditional and online classrooms found both delivery systems to be adequate. Another research theme focused on learners’ characteristics ( n  = 12, 15.8%) and the synergy of learners, design of the online course, and system of delivery. Research findings revealed that online learners were mainly non-traditional, Caucasian, had different learning styles, and were highly motivated to learn. The final theme that they reported was institutional and administrative factors (n  = 13, 17.1%) on online learning. Their findings revealed that there was a lack of scholarly research in this area and most institutions did not have formal policies in place for course development as well as faculty and student support in training and evaluation. Their research confirmed that when universities offered online courses, it improved student enrollment numbers.

2.3. Distance education research themes 2000 to 2008 ( Zawacki-Richter et al., 2009 )

Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) reviewed 695 articles on distance education from 2000 to 2008 using the Delphi method for consensus in identifying areas and classified the literature from five prominent journals. The five journals selected due to their wide scope in research in distance education included Open Learning, Distance Education, American Journal of Distance Education, the Journal of Distance Education, and the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. The reviewers examined the main focus of research and identified gaps in distance education research in this review.

Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) classified the studies into macro, meso and micro levels focusing on 15 areas of research. The five areas of the macro-level addressed: (1) access, equity and ethics to deliver distance education for developing nations and the role of various technologies to narrow the digital divide, (2) teaching and learning drivers, markets, and professional development in the global context, (3) distance delivery systems and institutional partnerships and programs and impact of hybrid modes of delivery, (4) theoretical frameworks and models for instruction, knowledge building, and learner interactions in distance education practice, and (5) the types of preferred research methodologies. The meso-level focused on seven areas that involve: (1) management and organization for sustaining distance education programs, (2) examining financial aspects of developing and implementing online programs, (3) the challenges and benefits of new technologies for teaching and learning, (4) incentives to innovate, (5) professional development and support for faculty, (6) learner support services, and (7) issues involving quality standards and the impact on student enrollment and retention. The micro-level focused on three areas: (1) instructional design and pedagogical approaches, (2) culturally appropriate materials, interaction, communication, and collaboration among a community of learners, and (3) focus on characteristics of adult learners, socio-economic backgrounds, learning preferences, and dispositions.

The top three research themes in this review by Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) were interaction and communities of learning ( n  = 122, 17.6%), instructional design ( n  = 121, 17.4%) and learner characteristics ( n  = 113, 16.3%). The lowest number of studies (less than 3%) were found in studies examining the following research themes, management and organization ( n  = 18), research methods in DE and knowledge transfer ( n  = 13), globalization of education and cross-cultural aspects ( n  = 13), innovation and change ( n  = 13), and costs and benefits ( n  = 12).

2.4. Online learning research themes

These three systematic reviews provide a broad understanding of distance education and online learning research themes from 1990 to 2008. However, there is an increase in the number of research studies on online learning in this decade and there is a need to identify recent research themes examined. Based on the previous systematic reviews ( Berge & Mrozowski, 2001 ; Hung, 2012 ; Tallent-Runnels et al., 2006 ; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2009 ), online learning research in this study is grouped into twelve different research themes which include Learner characteristics, Instructor characteristics, Course or program design and development, Course Facilitation, Engagement, Course Assessment, Course Technologies, Access, Culture, Equity, Inclusion, and Ethics, Leadership, Policy and Management, Instructor and Learner Support, and Learner Outcomes. Table 2 below describes each of the research themes and using these themes, a framework is derived in Fig. 1 .

Research themes in online learning.

Online learning research themes framework.

The collection of research themes is presented as a framework in Fig. 1 . The themes are organized by domain or level to underscore the nested relationship that exists. As evidenced by the assortment of themes, research can focus on any domain of delivery or associated context. The “Learner” domain captures characteristics and outcomes related to learners and their interaction within the courses. The “Course and Instructor” domain captures elements about the broader design of the course and facilitation by the instructor, and the “Organizational” domain acknowledges the contextual influences on the course. It is important to note as well that due to the nesting, research themes can cross domains. For example, the broader cultural context may be studied as it pertains to course design and development, and institutional support can include both learner support and instructor support. Likewise, engagement research can involve instructors as well as learners.

In this introduction section, we have reviewed three systematic reviews on online learning research ( Berge & Mrozowski, 2001 ; Tallent-Runnels et al., 2006 ; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2009 ). Based on these reviews and other research, we have derived twelve themes to develop an online learning research framework which is nested in three levels: learner, course and instructor, and organization.

2.5. Purpose of this research

In two out of the three previous reviews, design, learner characteristics and interaction were examined in the highest number of studies. On the other hand, cost-benefit tradeoffs, equity and accessibility, institutional and administrative factors, and globalization and cross-cultural aspects were examined in the least number of studies. One explanation for this may be that it is a function of nesting, noting that studies falling in the Organizational and Course levels may encompass several courses or many more participants within courses. However, while some research themes re-occur, there are also variations in some themes across time, suggesting the importance of research themes rise and fall over time. Thus, a critical examination of the trends in themes is helpful for understanding where research is needed most. Also, since there is no recent study examining online learning research themes in the last decade, this study strives to address that gap by focusing on recent research themes found in the literature, and also reviewing research methods and settings. Notably, one goal is to also compare findings from this decade to the previous review studies. Overall, the purpose of this study is to examine publication trends in online learning research taking place during the last ten years and compare it with the previous themes identified in other review studies. Due to the continued growth of online learning research into new contexts and among new researchers, we also examine the research methods and settings found in the studies of this review.

The following research questions are addressed in this study.

• 1. What percentage of the population of articles published in the journals reviewed from 2009 to 2018 were related to online learning and empirical?
• 2. What is the frequency of online learning research themes in the empirical online learning articles of journals reviewed from 2009 to 2018?
• 3. What is the frequency of research methods and settings that researchers employed in the empirical online learning articles of the journals reviewed from 2009 to 2018?

This five-step systematic review process described in the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 4.0 ( 2017 ) was used in this systematic review: (a) developing the review protocol, (b) identifying relevant literature, (c) screening studies, (d) reviewing articles, and (e) reporting findings.

3.1. Data sources and search strategies

The Education Research Complete database was searched using the keywords below for published articles between the years 2009 and 2018 using both the Title and Keyword function for the following search terms.

“online learning" OR "online teaching" OR "online program" OR "online course" OR “online education”

3.2. Inclusion/exclusion criteria

The initial search of online learning research among journals in the database resulted in more than 3000 possible articles. Therefore, we limited our search to select journals that focus on publishing peer-reviewed online learning and educational research. Our aim was to capture the journals that published the most articles in online learning. However, we also wanted to incorporate the concept of rigor, so we used expert perception to identify 12 peer-reviewed journals that publish high-quality online learning research. Dissertations and conference proceedings were excluded. To be included in this systematic review, each study had to meet the screening criteria as described in Table 3 . A research study was excluded if it did not meet all of the criteria to be included.

Inclusion/Exclusion criteria.

3.3. Process flow selection of articles

Fig. 2 shows the process flow involved in the selection of articles. The search in the database Education Research Complete yielded an initial sample of 3332 articles. Targeting the 12 journals removed 2579 articles. After reviewing the abstracts, we removed 134 articles based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The final sample, consisting of 619 articles, was entered into the computer software MAXQDA ( VERBI Software, 2019 ) for coding.

Flowchart of online learning research selection.

3.4. Developing review protocol

A review protocol was designed as a codebook in MAXQDA ( VERBI Software, 2019 ) by the three researchers. The codebook was developed based on findings from the previous review studies and from the initial screening of the articles in this review. The codebook included 12 research themes listed earlier in Table 2 (Learner characteristics, Instructor characteristics, Course or program design and development, Course Facilitation, Engagement, Course Assessment, Course Technologies, Access, Culture, Equity, Inclusion, and Ethics, Leadership, Policy and Management, Instructor and Learner Support, and Learner Outcomes), four research settings (higher education, continuing education, K-12, corporate/military), and three research designs (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods). Fig. 3 below is a screenshot of MAXQDA used for the coding process.

Codebook from MAXQDA.

3.5. Data coding

Research articles were coded by two researchers in MAXQDA. Two researchers independently coded 10% of the articles and then discussed and updated the coding framework. The second author who was a doctoral student coded the remaining studies. The researchers met bi-weekly to address coding questions that emerged. After the first phase of coding, we found that more than 100 studies fell into each of the categories of Learner Characteristics or Engagement, so we decided to pursue a second phase of coding and reexamine the two themes. Learner Characteristics were classified into the subthemes of Academic, Affective, Motivational, Self-regulation, Cognitive, and Demographic Characteristics. Engagement was classified into the subthemes of Collaborating, Communication, Community, Involvement, Interaction, Participation, and Presence.

3.6. Data analysis

Frequency tables were generated for each of the variables so that outliers could be examined and narrative data could be collapsed into categories. Once cleaned and collapsed into a reasonable number of categories, descriptive statistics were used to describe each of the coded elements. We first present the frequencies of publications related to online learning in the 12 journals. The total number of articles for each journal (collectively, the population) was hand-counted from journal websites, excluding editorials and book reviews. The publication trend of online learning research was also depicted from 2009 to 2018. Then, the descriptive information of the 12 themes, including the subthemes of Learner Characteristics and Engagement were provided. Finally, research themes by research settings and methodology were elaborated.

4.1. Publication trends on online learning

Publication patterns of the 619 articles reviewed from the 12 journals are presented in Table 4 . International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning had the highest number of publications in this review. Overall, about 8% of the articles appearing in these twelve journals consisted of online learning publications; however, several journals had concentrations of online learning articles totaling more than 20%.

Empirical online learning research articles by journal, 2009–2018.

Note . Journal's Total Article count excludes reviews and editorials.

The publication trend of online learning research is depicted in Fig. 4 . When disaggregated by year, the total frequency of publications shows an increasing trend. Online learning articles increased throughout the decade and hit a relative maximum in 2014. The greatest number of online learning articles ( n  = 86) occurred most recently, in 2018.

Online learning publication trends by year.

4.2. Online learning research themes that appeared in the selected articles

The publications were categorized into the twelve research themes identified in Fig. 1 . The frequency counts and percentages of the research themes are provided in Table 5 below. A majority of the research is categorized into the Learner domain. The fewest number of articles appears in the Organization domain.

Research themes in the online learning publications from 2009 to 2018.

The specific themes of Engagement ( n  = 179, 28.92%) and Learner Characteristics ( n  = 134, 21.65%) were most often examined in publications. These two themes were further coded to identify sub-themes, which are described in the next two sections. Publications focusing on Instructor Characteristics ( n  = 21, 3.39%) were least common in the dataset.

4.2.1. Research on engagement

The largest number of studies was on engagement in online learning, which in the online learning literature is referred to and examined through different terms. Hence, we explore this category in more detail. In this review, we categorized the articles into seven different sub-themes as examined through different lenses including presence, interaction, community, participation, collaboration, involvement, and communication. We use the term “involvement” as one of the terms since researchers sometimes broadly used the term engagement to describe their work without further description. Table 6 below provides the description, frequency, and percentages of the various studies related to engagement.

Research sub-themes on engagement.

In the sections below, we provide several examples of the different engagement sub-themes that were studied within the larger engagement theme.

Presence. This sub-theme was the most researched in engagement. With the development of the community of inquiry framework most of the studies in this subtheme examined social presence ( Akcaoglu & Lee, 2016 ; Phirangee & Malec, 2017 ; Wei et al., 2012 ), teaching presence ( Orcutt & Dringus, 2017 ; Preisman, 2014 ; Wisneski et al., 2015 ) and cognitive presence ( Archibald, 2010 ; Olesova et al., 2016 ).

Interaction . This was the second most studied theme under engagement. Researchers examined increasing interpersonal interactions ( Cung et al., 2018 ), learner-learner interactions ( Phirangee, 2016 ; Shackelford & Maxwell, 2012 ; Tawfik et al., 2018 ), peer-peer interaction ( Comer et al., 2014 ), learner-instructor interaction ( Kuo et al., 2014 ), learner-content interaction ( Zimmerman, 2012 ), interaction through peer mentoring ( Ruane & Koku, 2014 ), interaction and community building ( Thormann & Fidalgo, 2014 ), and interaction in discussions ( Ruane & Lee, 2016 ; Tibi, 2018 ).

Community. Researchers examined building community in online courses ( Berry, 2017 ), supporting a sense of community ( Jiang, 2017 ), building an online learning community of practice ( Cho, 2016 ), building an academic community ( Glazer & Wanstreet, 2011 ; Nye, 2015 ; Overbaugh & Nickel, 2011 ), and examining connectedness and rapport in an online community ( Bolliger & Inan, 2012 ; Murphy & Rodríguez-Manzanares, 2012 ; Slagter van Tryon & Bishop, 2012 ).

Participation. Researchers examined engagement through participation in a number of studies. Some of the topics include, participation patterns in online discussion ( Marbouti & Wise, 2016 ; Wise et al., 2012 ), participation in MOOCs ( Ahn et al., 2013 ; Saadatmand & Kumpulainen, 2014 ), features that influence students’ online participation ( Rye & Støkken, 2012 ) and active participation.

Collaboration. Researchers examined engagement through collaborative learning. Specific studies focused on cross-cultural collaboration ( Kumi-Yeboah, 2018 ; Yang et al., 2014 ), how virtual teams collaborate ( Verstegen et al., 2018 ), types of collaboration teams ( Wicks et al., 2015 ), tools for collaboration ( Boling et al., 2014 ), and support for collaboration ( Kopp et al., 2012 ).

Involvement. Researchers examined engaging learners through involvement in various learning activities ( Cundell & Sheepy, 2018 ), student engagement through various measures ( Dixson, 2015 ), how instructors included engagement to involve students in learning ( O'Shea et al., 2015 ), different strategies to engage the learner ( Amador & Mederer, 2013 ), and designed emotionally engaging online environments ( Koseoglu & Doering, 2011 ).

Communication. Researchers examined communication in online learning in studies using social network analysis ( Ergün & Usluel, 2016 ), using informal communication tools such as Facebook for class discussion ( Kent, 2013 ), and using various modes of communication ( Cunningham et al., 2010 ; Rowe, 2016 ). Studies have also focused on both asynchronous and synchronous aspects of communication ( Swaggerty & Broemmel, 2017 ; Yamagata-Lynch, 2014 ).

4.2.2. Research on learner characteristics

The second largest theme was learner characteristics. In this review, we explore this further to identify several aspects of learner characteristics. In this review, we categorized the learner characteristics into self-regulation characteristics, motivational characteristics, academic characteristics, affective characteristics, cognitive characteristics, and demographic characteristics. Table 7 provides the number of studies and percentages examining the various learner characteristics.

Research sub-themes on learner characteristics.

Online learning has elements that are different from the traditional face-to-face classroom and so the characteristics of the online learners are also different. Yukselturk and Top (2013) categorized online learner profile into ten aspects: gender, age, work status, self-efficacy, online readiness, self-regulation, participation in discussion list, participation in chat sessions, satisfaction, and achievement. Their categorization shows that there are differences in online learner characteristics in these aspects when compared to learners in other settings. Some of the other aspects such as participation and achievement as discussed by Yukselturk and Top (2013) are discussed in different research themes in this study. The sections below provide examples of the learner characteristics sub-themes that were studied.

Self-regulation. Several researchers have examined self-regulation in online learning. They found that successful online learners are academically motivated ( Artino & Stephens, 2009 ), have academic self-efficacy ( Cho & Shen, 2013 ), have grit and intention to succeed ( Wang & Baker, 2018 ), have time management and elaboration strategies ( Broadbent, 2017 ), set goals and revisit course content ( Kizilcec et al., 2017 ), and persist ( Glazer & Murphy, 2015 ). Researchers found a positive relationship between learner's self-regulation and interaction ( Delen et al., 2014 ) and self-regulation and communication and collaboration ( Barnard et al., 2009 ).

Motivation. Researchers focused on motivation of online learners including different motivation levels of online learners ( Li & Tsai, 2017 ), what motivated online learners ( Chaiprasurt & Esichaikul, 2013 ), differences in motivation of online learners ( Hartnett et al., 2011 ), and motivation when compared to face to face learners ( Paechter & Maier, 2010 ). Harnett et al. (2011) found that online learner motivation was complex, multifaceted, and sensitive to situational conditions.

Academic. Several researchers have focused on academic aspects for online learner characteristics. Readiness for online learning has been examined as an academic factor by several researchers ( Buzdar et al., 2016 ; Dray et al., 2011 ; Wladis & Samuels, 2016 ; Yu, 2018 ) specifically focusing on creating and validating measures to examine online learner readiness including examining students emotional intelligence as a measure of student readiness for online learning. Researchers have also examined other academic factors such as academic standing ( Bradford & Wyatt, 2010 ), course level factors ( Wladis et al., 2014 ) and academic skills in online courses ( Shea & Bidjerano, 2014 ).

Affective. Anderson and Bourke (2013) describe affective characteristics through which learners express feelings or emotions. Several research studies focused on the affective characteristics of online learners. Learner satisfaction for online learning has been examined by several researchers ( Cole et al., 2014 ; Dziuban et al., 2015 ; Kuo et al., 2013 ; Lee, 2014a ) along with examining student emotions towards online assessment ( Kim et al., 2014 ).

Cognitive. Researchers have also examined cognitive aspects of learner characteristics including meta-cognitive skills, cognitive variables, higher-order thinking, cognitive density, and critical thinking ( Chen & Wu, 2012 ; Lee, 2014b ). Lee (2014b) examined the relationship between cognitive presence density and higher-order thinking skills. Chen and Wu (2012) examined the relationship between cognitive and motivational variables in an online system for secondary physical education.

Demographic. Researchers have examined various demographic factors in online learning. Several researchers have examined gender differences in online learning ( Bayeck et al., 2018 ; Lowes et al., 2016 ; Yukselturk & Bulut, 2009 ), ethnicity, age ( Ke & Kwak, 2013 ), and minority status ( Yeboah & Smith, 2016 ) of online learners.

4.2.3. Less frequently studied research themes

While engagement and learner characteristics were studied the most, other themes were less often studied in the literature and are presented here, according to size, with general descriptions of the types of research examined for each.

Evaluation and Quality Assurance. There were 38 studies (6.14%) published in the theme of evaluation and quality assurance. Some of the studies in this theme focused on course quality standards, using quality matters to evaluate quality, using the CIPP model for evaluation, online learning system evaluation, and course and program evaluations.

Course Technologies. There were 35 studies (5.65%) published in the course technologies theme. Some of the studies examined specific technologies such as Edmodo, YouTube, Web 2.0 tools, wikis, Twitter, WebCT, Screencasts, and Web conferencing systems in the online learning context.

Course Facilitation. There were 34 studies (5.49%) published in the course facilitation theme. Some of the studies in this theme examined facilitation strategies and methods, experiences of online facilitators, and online teaching methods.

Institutional Support. There were 33 studies (5.33%) published in the institutional support theme which included support for both the instructor and learner. Some of the studies on instructor support focused on training new online instructors, mentoring programs for faculty, professional development resources for faculty, online adjunct faculty training, and institutional support for online instructors. Studies on learner support focused on learning resources for online students, cognitive and social support for online learners, and help systems for online learner support.

Learner Outcome. There were 32 studies (5.17%) published in the learner outcome theme. Some of the studies that were examined in this theme focused on online learner enrollment, completion, learner dropout, retention, and learner success.

Course Assessment. There were 30 studies (4.85%) published in the course assessment theme. Some of the studies in the course assessment theme examined online exams, peer assessment and peer feedback, proctoring in online exams, and alternative assessments such as eportfolio.

Access, Culture, Equity, Inclusion, and Ethics. There were 29 studies (4.68%) published in the access, culture, equity, inclusion, and ethics theme. Some of the studies in this theme examined online learning across cultures, multi-cultural effectiveness, multi-access, and cultural diversity in online learning.

Leadership, Policy, and Management. There were 27 studies (4.36%) published in the leadership, policy, and management theme. Some of the studies on leadership, policy, and management focused on online learning leaders, stakeholders, strategies for online learning leadership, resource requirements, university policies for online course policies, governance, course ownership, and faculty incentives for online teaching.

Course Design and Development. There were 27 studies (4.36%) published in the course design and development theme. Some of the studies examined in this theme focused on design elements, design issues, design process, design competencies, design considerations, and instructional design in online courses.

Instructor Characteristics. There were 21 studies (3.39%) published in the instructor characteristics theme. Some of the studies in this theme were on motivation and experiences of online instructors, ability to perform online teaching duties, roles of online instructors, and adjunct versus full-time online instructors.

4.3. Research settings and methodology used in the studies

The research methods used in the studies were classified into quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods ( Harwell, 2012 , pp. 147–163). The research setting was categorized into higher education, continuing education, K-12, and corporate/military. As shown in Table A in the appendix, the vast majority of the publications used higher education as the research setting ( n  = 509, 67.6%). Table B in the appendix shows that approximately half of the studies adopted the quantitative method ( n  = 324, 43.03%), followed by the qualitative method ( n  = 200, 26.56%). Mixed methods account for the smallest portion ( n  = 95, 12.62%).

Table A shows that the patterns of the four research settings were approximately consistent across the 12 themes except for the theme of Leaner Outcome and Institutional Support. Continuing education had a higher relative frequency in Learner Outcome (0.28) and K-12 had a higher relative frequency in Institutional Support (0.33) compared to the frequencies they had in the total themes (0.09 and 0.08 respectively). Table B in the appendix shows that the distribution of the three methods were not consistent across the 12 themes. While quantitative studies and qualitative studies were roughly evenly distributed in Engagement, they had a large discrepancy in Learner Characteristics. There were 100 quantitative studies; however, only 18 qualitative studies published in the theme of Learner Characteristics.

In summary, around 8% of the articles published in the 12 journals focus on online learning. Online learning publications showed a tendency of increase on the whole in the past decade, albeit fluctuated, with the greatest number occurring in 2018. Among the 12 research themes related to online learning, the themes of Engagement and Learner Characteristics were studied the most and the theme of Instructor Characteristics was studied the least. Most studies were conducted in the higher education setting and approximately half of the studies used the quantitative method. Looking at the 12 themes by setting and method, we found that the patterns of the themes by setting or by method were not consistent across the 12 themes.

The quality of our findings was ensured by scientific and thorough searches and coding consistency. The selection of the 12 journals provides evidence of the representativeness and quality of primary studies. In the coding process, any difficulties and questions were resolved by consultations with the research team at bi-weekly meetings, which ensures the intra-rater and interrater reliability of coding. All these approaches guarantee the transparency and replicability of the process and the quality of our results.

5. Discussion

This review enabled us to identify the online learning research themes examined from 2009 to 2018. In the section below, we review the most studied research themes, engagement and learner characteristics along with implications, limitations, and directions for future research.

5.1. Most studied research themes

Three out of the four systematic reviews informing the design of the present study found that online learner characteristics and online engagement were examined in a high number of studies. In this review, about half of the studies reviewed (50.57%) focused on online learner characteristics or online engagement. This shows the continued importance of these two themes. In the Tallent-Runnels et al.’s (2006) study, the learner characteristics theme was identified as least studied for which they state that researchers are beginning to investigate learner characteristics in the early days of online learning.

One of the differences found in this review is that course design and development was examined in the least number of studies in this review compared to two prior systematic reviews ( Berge & Mrozowski, 2001 ; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2009 ). Zawacki-Richter et al. did not use a keyword search but reviewed all the articles in five different distance education journals. Berge and Mrozowski (2001) included a research theme called design issues to include all aspects of instructional systems design in distance education journals. In our study, in addition to course design and development, we also had focused themes on learner outcomes, course facilitation, course assessment and course evaluation. These are all instructional design focused topics and since we had multiple themes focusing on instructional design topics, the course design and development category might have resulted in fewer studies. There is still a need for more studies to focus on online course design and development.

5.2. Least frequently studied research themes

Three out of the four systematic reviews discussed in the opening of this study found management and organization factors to be least studied. In this review, Leadership, Policy, and Management was studied among 4.36% of the studies and Access, Culture, Equity, Inclusion, and Ethics was studied among 4.68% of the studies in the organizational level. The theme on Equity and accessibility was also found to be the least studied theme in the Berge and Mrozowski (2001) study. In addition, instructor characteristics was the least examined research theme among the twelve themes studied in this review. Only 3.39% of the studies were on instructor characteristics. While there were some studies examining instructor motivation and experiences, instructor ability to teach online, online instructor roles, and adjunct versus full-time online instructors, there is still a need to examine topics focused on instructors and online teaching. This theme was not included in the prior reviews as the focus was more on the learner and the course but not on the instructor. While it is helpful to see research evolving on instructor focused topics, there is still a need for more research on the online instructor.

5.3. Comparing research themes from current study to previous studies

The research themes from this review were compared with research themes from previous systematic reviews, which targeted prior decades. Table 8 shows the comparison.

Comparison of most and least studied online learning research themes from current to previous reviews.

L = Learner, C=Course O=Organization.

5.4. Need for more studies on organizational level themes of online learning

In this review there is a greater concentration of studies focused on Learner domain topics, and reduced attention to broader more encompassing research themes that fall into the Course and Organization domains. There is a need for organizational level topics such as Access, Culture, Equity, Inclusion and Ethics, and Leadership, Policy and Management to be researched on within the context of online learning. Examination of access, culture, equity, inclusion and ethics is very important to support diverse online learners, particularly with the rapid expansion of online learning across all educational levels. This was also least studied based on Berge and Mrozowski (2001) systematic review.

The topics on leadership, policy and management were least studied both in this review and also in the Tallent-Runnels et al. (2006) and Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) study. Tallent-Runnels categorized institutional and administrative aspects into institutional policies, institutional support, and enrollment effects. While we included support as a separate category, in this study leadership, policy and management were combined. There is still a need for research on leadership of those who manage online learning, policies for online education, and managing online programs. In the Zawacki-Richter et al. (2009) study, only a few studies examined management and organization focused topics. They also found management and organization to be strongly correlated with costs and benefits. In our study, costs and benefits were collectively included as an aspect of management and organization and not as a theme by itself. These studies will provide research-based evidence for online education administrators.

6. Limitations

As with any systematic review, there are limitations to the scope of the review. The search is limited to twelve journals in the field that typically include research on online learning. These manuscripts were identified by searching the Education Research Complete database which focuses on education students, professionals, and policymakers. Other discipline-specific journals as well as dissertations and proceedings were not included due to the volume of articles. Also, the search was performed using five search terms “online learning" OR "online teaching" OR "online program" OR "online course" OR “online education” in title and keyword. If authors did not include these terms, their respective work may have been excluded from this review even if it focused on online learning. While these terms are commonly used in North America, it may not be commonly used in other parts of the world. Additional studies may exist outside this scope.

The search strategy also affected how we presented results and introduced limitations regarding generalization. We identified that only 8% of the articles published in these journals were related to online learning; however, given the use of search terms to identify articles within select journals it was not feasible to identify the total number of research-based articles in the population. Furthermore, our review focused on the topics and general methods of research and did not systematically consider the quality of the published research. Lastly, some journals may have preferences for publishing studies on a particular topic or that use a particular method (e.g., quantitative methods), which introduces possible selection and publication biases which may skew the interpretation of results due to over/under representation. Future studies are recommended to include more journals to minimize the selection bias and obtain a more representative sample.

Certain limitations can be attributed to the coding process. Overall, the coding process for this review worked well for most articles, as each tended to have an individual or dominant focus as described in the abstracts, though several did mention other categories which likely were simultaneously considered to a lesser degree. However, in some cases, a dominant theme was not as apparent and an effort to create mutually exclusive groups for clearer interpretation the coders were occasionally forced to choose between two categories. To facilitate this coding, the full-texts were used to identify a study focus through a consensus seeking discussion among all authors. Likewise, some studies focused on topics that we have associated with a particular domain, but the design of the study may have promoted an aggregated examination or integrated factors from multiple domains (e.g., engagement). Due to our reliance on author descriptions, the impact of construct validity is likely a concern that requires additional exploration. Our final grouping of codes may not have aligned with the original author's description in the abstract. Additionally, coding of broader constructs which disproportionately occur in the Learner domain, such as learner outcomes, learner characteristics, and engagement, likely introduced bias towards these codes when considering studies that involved multiple domains. Additional refinement to explore the intersection of domains within studies is needed.

7. Implications and future research

One of the strengths of this review is the research categories we have identified. We hope these categories will support future researchers and identify areas and levels of need for future research. Overall, there is some agreement on research themes on online learning research among previous reviews and this one, at the same time there are some contradicting findings. We hope the most-researched themes and least-researched themes provide authors a direction on the importance of research and areas of need to focus on.

The leading themes found in this review is online engagement research. However, presentation of this research was inconsistent, and often lacked specificity. This is not unique to online environments, but the nuances of defining engagement in an online environment are unique and therefore need further investigation and clarification. This review points to seven distinct classifications of online engagement. Further research on engagement should indicate which type of engagement is sought. This level of specificity is necessary to establish instruments for measuring engagement and ultimately testing frameworks for classifying engagement and promoting it in online environments. Also, it might be of importance to examine the relationship between these seven sub-themes of engagement.

Additionally, this review highlights growing attention to learner characteristics, which constitutes a shift in focus away from instructional characteristics and course design. Although this is consistent with the focus on engagement, the role of the instructor, and course design with respect to these outcomes remains important. Results of the learner characteristics and engagement research paired with course design will have important ramifications for the use of teaching and learning professionals who support instruction. Additionally, the review also points to a concentration of research in the area of higher education. With an immediate and growing emphasis on online learning in K-12 and corporate settings, there is a critical need for further investigation in these settings.

Lastly, because the present review did not focus on the overall effect of interventions, opportunities exist for dedicated meta-analyses. Particular attention to research on engagement and learner characteristics as well as how these vary by study design and outcomes would be logical additions to the research literature.

8. Conclusion

This systematic review builds upon three previous reviews which tackled the topic of online learning between 1990 and 2010 by extending the timeframe to consider the most recent set of published research. Covering the most recent decade, our review of 619 articles from 12 leading online learning journal points to a more concentrated focus on the learner domain including engagement and learner characteristics, with more limited attention to topics pertaining to the classroom or organizational level. The review highlights an opportunity for the field to clarify terminology concerning online learning research, particularly in the areas of learner outcomes where there is a tendency to classify research more generally (e.g., engagement). Using this sample of published literature, we provide a possible taxonomy for categorizing this research using subcategories. The field could benefit from a broader conversation about how these categories can shape a comprehensive framework for online learning research. Such efforts will enable the field to effectively prioritize research aims over time and synthesize effects.

Credit author statement

Florence Martin: Conceptualization; Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing Preparation, Supervision, Project administration. Ting Sun: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Carl Westine: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

1 Includes articles that are cited in this manuscript and also included in the systematic review. The entire list of 619 articles used in the systematic review can be obtained by emailing the authors.*

Appendix B Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 .

Appendix A. 

Research Themes by the Settings in the Online Learning Publications

Research Themes by the Methodology in the Online Learning Publications

Appendix B. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

References 1

• Ahn J., Butler B.S., Alam A., Webster S.A. Learner participation and engagement in open online courses: Insights from the Peer 2 Peer University. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2013; 9 (2):160–171. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Akcaoglu M., Lee E. Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2016; 17 (3) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Allen I.E., Seaman J. Babson survey research group; 2017. Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment Report 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Amador J.A., Mederer H. Migrating successful student engagement strategies online: Opportunities and challenges using jigsaw groups and problem-based learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2013; 9 (1):89. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Anderson L.W., Bourke S.F. Routledge; 2013. Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. [ Google Scholar ]
• Archibald D. Fostering the development of cognitive presence: Initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument. The Internet and Higher Education. 2010; 13 (1–2):73–74. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Artino A.R., Jr., Stephens J.M. Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education. 2009; 12 (3–4):146–151. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barnard L., Lan W.Y., To Y.M., Paton V.O., Lai S.L. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education. 2009; 12 (1):1–6. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Bayeck R.Y., Hristova A., Jablokow K.W., Bonafini F. Exploring the relevance of single‐gender group formation: What we learn from a massive open online course (MOOC) British Journal of Educational Technology. 2018; 49 (1):88–100. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Berge Z., Mrozowski S. Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education. 2001; 15 (3):5–19. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527090. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berry S. Building community in online doctoral classrooms: Instructor practices that support community. Online Learning. 2017; 21 (2):n2. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Boling E.C., Holan E., Horbatt B., Hough M., Jean-Louis J., Khurana C., Spiezio C. Using online tools for communication and collaboration: Understanding educators' experiences in an online course. The Internet and Higher Education. 2014; 23 :48–55. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Bolliger D.U., Inan F.A. Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS) International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2012; 13 (3):41–65. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Bradford G., Wyatt S. Online learning and student satisfaction: Academic standing, ethnicity and their influence on facilitated learning, engagement, and information fluency. The Internet and Higher Education. 2010; 13 (3):108–114. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Broadbent J. Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education. 2017; 33 :24–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buzdar M., Ali A., Tariq R. Emotional intelligence as a determinant of readiness for online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2016; 17 (1) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Capdeferro N., Romero M., Barberà E. Polychronicity: Review of the literature and a new configuration for the study of this hidden dimension of online learning. Distance Education. 2014; 35 (3):294–310. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chaiprasurt C., Esichaikul V. Enhancing motivation in online courses with mobile communication tool support: A comparative study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2013; 14 (3):377–401. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen C.H., Wu I.C. The interplay between cognitive and motivational variables in a supportive online learning system for secondary physical education. Computers & Education. 2012; 58 (1):542–550. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Cho H. Under co-construction: An online community of practice for bilingual pre-service teachers. Computers & Education. 2016; 92 :76–89. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Cho M.H., Shen D. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education. 2013; 34 (3):290–301. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cole M.T., Shelley D.J., Swartz L.B. Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three-year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014; 15 (6) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Comer D.K., Clark C.R., Canelas D.A. Writing to learn and learning to write across the disciplines: Peer-to-peer writing in introductory-level MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014; 15 (5):26–82. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Cundell A., Sheepy E. Student perceptions of the most effective and engaging online learning activities in a blended graduate seminar. Online Learning. 2018; 22 (3):87–102. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Cung B., Xu D., Eichhorn S. Increasing interpersonal interactions in an online course: Does increased instructor email activity and voluntary meeting time in a physical classroom facilitate student learning? Online Learning. 2018; 22 (3):193–215. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cunningham U.M., Fägersten K.B., Holmsten E. Can you hear me, Hanoi?" Compensatory mechanisms employed in synchronous net-based English language learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2010; 11 (1):161–177. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davis D., Chen G., Hauff C., Houben G.J. Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education. 2018; 125 :327–344. [ Google Scholar ]
• Delen E., Liew J., Willson V. Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education. 2014; 78 :312–320. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dixson M.D. Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE) Online Learning. 2015; 19 (4):n4. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Dray B.J., Lowenthal P.R., Miszkiewicz M.J., Ruiz‐Primo M.A., Marczynski K. Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education. 2011; 32 (1):29–47. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Dziuban C., Moskal P., Thompson J., Kramer L., DeCantis G., Hermsdorfer A. Student satisfaction with online learning: Is it a psychological contract? Online Learning. 2015; 19 (2):n2. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Ergün E., Usluel Y.K. An analysis of density and degree-centrality according to the social networking structure formed in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2016; 19 (4):34–46. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Esfijani A. Measuring quality in online education: A meta-synthesis. American Journal of Distance Education. 2018; 32 (1):57–73. [ Google Scholar ]
• Glazer H.R., Murphy J.A. Optimizing success: A model for persistence in online education. American Journal of Distance Education. 2015; 29 (2):135–144. [ Google Scholar ]
• Glazer H.R., Wanstreet C.E. Connection to the academic community: Perceptions of students in online education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2011; 12 (1):55. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Hartnett M., George A.S., Dron J. Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted and situation-dependent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2011; 12 (6):20–38. [ Google Scholar ]
• Harwell M.R. 2012. Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. Section III. Opportunities and challenges in designing and conducting inquiry. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hung J.L. Trends of e‐learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2012; 43 (1):5–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jiang W. Interdependence of roles, role rotation, and sense of community in an online course. Distance Education. 2017; 38 (1):84–105. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ke F., Kwak D. Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education. 2013; 61 :43–51. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kent M. Changing the conversation: Facebook as a venue for online class discussion in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2013; 9 (4):546–565. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim C., Park S.W., Cozart J. Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014; 45 (1):171–185. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kizilcec R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín M., Maldonado J.J. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education. 2017; 104 :18–33. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kopp B., Matteucci M.C., Tomasetto C. E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors. Computers & Education. 2012; 58 (1):12–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Koseoglu S., Doering A. Understanding complex ecologies: An investigation of student experiences in adventure learning programs. Distance Education. 2011; 32 (3):339–355. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Kumi-Yeboah A. Designing a cross-cultural collaborative online learning framework for online instructors. Online Learning. 2018; 22 (4):181–201. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuo Y.C., Walker A.E., Belland B.R., Schroder K.E. A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2013; 14 (1):16–39. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuo Y.C., Walker A.E., Schroder K.E., Belland B.R. Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education. 2014; 20 :35–50. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee J. An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014; 15 (1) [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee S.M. The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 2014; 21 :41–52. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee K. Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education. 2017; 33 :15–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee Y., Choi J. A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2011; 59 (5):593–618. [ Google Scholar ]
• Li L.Y., Tsai C.C. Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers & Education. 2017; 114 :286–297. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liyanagunawardena T., Adams A., Williams S. MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2013; 14 (3):202–227. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lowes S., Lin P., Kinghorn B.R. Gender differences in online high school courses. Online Learning. 2016; 20 (4):100–117. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marbouti F., Wise A.F. Starburst: A new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others' posts in online discussions. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2016; 64 (1):87–113. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin F., Ahlgrim-Delzell L., Budhrani K. Systematic review of two decades (1995 to 2014) of research on synchronous online learning. American Journal of Distance Education. 2017; 31 (1):3–19. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moore-Adams B.L., Jones W.M., Cohen J. Learning to teach online: A systematic review of the literature on K-12 teacher preparation for teaching online. Distance Education. 2016; 37 (3):333–348. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murphy E., Rodríguez-Manzanares M.A. Rapport in distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2012; 13 (1):167–190. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Nye A. Building an online academic learning community among undergraduate students. Distance Education. 2015; 36 (1):115–128. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Olesova L., Slavin M., Lim J. Exploring the effect of scripted roles on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Online Learning. 2016; 20 (4):34–53. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Orcutt J.M., Dringus L.P. Beyond being there: Practices that establish presence, engage students and influence intellectual curiosity in a structured online learning environment. Online Learning. 2017; 21 (3):15–35. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Overbaugh R.C., Nickel C.E. A comparison of student satisfaction and value of academic community between blended and online sections of a university-level educational foundations course. The Internet and Higher Education. 2011; 14 (3):164–174. * [ Google Scholar ]
• O'Shea S., Stone C., Delahunty J. “I ‘feel’like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education. 2015; 36 (1):41–58. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Paechter M., Maier B. Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education. 2010; 13 (4):292–297. [ Google Scholar ]
• Phirangee K. Students' perceptions of learner-learner interactions that weaken a sense of community in an online learning environment. Online Learning. 2016; 20 (4):13–33. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Phirangee K., Malec A. Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education. 2017; 38 (2):160–172. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Preisman K.A. Teaching presence in online education: From the instructor's point of view. Online Learning. 2014; 18 (3):n3. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Rowe M. Developing graduate attributes in an open online course. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016; 47 (5):873–882. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Ruane R., Koku E.F. Social network analysis of undergraduate education student interaction in online peer mentoring settings. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2014; 10 (4):577–589. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Ruane R., Lee V.J. Analysis of discussion board interaction in an online peer mentoring site. Online Learning. 2016; 20 (4):79–99. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Rye S.A., Støkken A.M. The implications of the local context in global virtual education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2012; 13 (1):191–206. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Saadatmand M., Kumpulainen K. Participants' perceptions of learning and networking in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2014; 10 (1):16. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Shackelford J.L., Maxwell M. Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2012; 13 (4):228–249. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Shea P., Bidjerano T. Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education. 2014; 75 :103–111. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Sherry L. Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 1996; 1 (4):337–365. [ Google Scholar ]
• Slagter van Tryon P.J., Bishop M.J. Evaluating social connectedness online: The design and development of the social perceptions in learning contexts instrument. Distance Education. 2012; 33 (3):347–364. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Swaggerty E.A., Broemmel A.D. Authenticity, relevance, and connectedness: Graduate students' learning preferences and experiences in an online reading education course. The Internet and Higher Education. 2017; 32 :80–86. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Tallent-Runnels M.K., Thomas J.A., Lan W.Y., Cooper S., Ahern T.C., Shaw S.M., Liu X. Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research. 2006; 76 (1):93–135. doi: 10.3102/00346543076001093. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tawfik A.A., Giabbanelli P.J., Hogan M., Msilu F., Gill A., York C.S. Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers & Education. 2018; 118 :120–132. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thomas J. Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review. Computers & Education. 2013; 69 :199–215. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thormann J., Fidalgo P. Guidelines for online course moderation and community building from a student's perspective. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2014; 10 (3):374–388. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Tibi M.H. Computer science students' attitudes towards the use of structured and unstructured discussion forums in fully online courses. Online Learning. 2018; 22 (1):93–106. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsai C.W., Chiang Y.C. Research trends in problem‐based learning (pbl) research in e‐learning and online education environments: A review of publications in SSCI‐indexed journals from 2004 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013; 44 (6):E185–E190. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsai C.W., Fan Y.T. Research trends in game‐based learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in SSCI‐indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013; 44 (5):E115–E119. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsai C.W., Shen P.D., Chiang Y.C. Research trends in meaningful learning research on e‐learning and online education environments: A review of studies published in SSCI‐indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013; 44 (6):E179–E184. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsai C.W., Shen P.D., Fan Y.T. Research trends in self‐regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013; 44 (5):E107–E110. [ Google Scholar ]
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences . InstituteofEducationSciences; Washington,DC: 2017. What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version3.0. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf Retrievedfrom. [ Google Scholar ]
• Veletsianos G., Shepherdson P. A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2016; 17 (2) [ Google Scholar ]
• VERBI Software . 2019. MAXQDA 2020 online manual. Retrieved from maxqda. Com/help-max20/welcome [ Google Scholar ]
• Verstegen D., Dailey-Hebert A., Fonteijn H., Clarebout G., Spruijt A. How do virtual teams collaborate in online learning tasks in a MOOC? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2018; 19 (4) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang Y., Baker R. Grit and intention: Why do learners complete MOOCs? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2018; 19 (3) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wei C.W., Chen N.S., Kinshuk A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2012; 60 (3):529–545. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wicks D., Craft B.B., Lee D., Lumpe A., Henrikson R., Baliram N., Wicks K. An evaluation of low versus high collaboration in online learning. Online Learning. 2015; 19 (4):n4. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wise A.F., Perera N., Hsiao Y.T., Speer J., Marbouti F. Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education. 2012; 15 (2):108–117. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wisneski J.E., Ozogul G., Bichelmeyer B.A. Does teaching presence transfer between MBA teaching environments? A comparative investigation of instructional design practices associated with teaching presence. The Internet and Higher Education. 2015; 25 :18–27. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wladis C., Hachey A.C., Conway K. An investigation of course-level factors as predictors of online STEM course outcomes. Computers & Education. 2014; 77 :145–150. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Wladis C., Samuels J. Do online readiness surveys do what they claim? Validity, reliability, and subsequent student enrollment decisions. Computers & Education. 2016; 98 :39–56. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yamagata-Lynch L.C. Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2014; 15 (2) * [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang J., Kinshuk, Yu H., Chen S.J., Huang R. Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2014; 17 (3):208–221. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Yeboah A.K., Smith P. Relationships between minority students online learning experiences and academic performance. Online Learning. 2016; 20 (4):n4. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu T. Examining construct validity of the student online learning readiness (SOLR) instrument using confirmatory factor analysis. Online Learning. 2018; 22 (4):277–288. * [ Google Scholar ]
• Yukselturk E., Bulut S. Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society. 2009; 12 (3):12–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yukselturk E., Top E. Exploring the link among entry characteristics, participation behaviors and course outcomes of online learners: An examination of learner profile using cluster analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2013; 44 (5):716–728. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zawacki-Richter O., Backer E., Vogt S. Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2009; 10 (6):30. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu M., Sari A., Lee M.M. A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016) The Internet and Higher Education. 2018; 37 :31–39. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zimmerman T.D. Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2012; 13 (4):152–165. [ Google Scholar ]