green supply chain management research topics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Going green: impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance.

• 1 Institute of Business and Management, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
• 2 Lyallpur Business School, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
• 3 Institute of Quality and Technology Management, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

The rising environmental challenges are capturing the attention of stakeholders of corporations due to increasing competition. The sustainable performance of firms does not merely gauge their economic performance but also their sustainable development. Since the environmental supply chain management of firms has an important part in maneuvering their sustainable performance, the present study focuses on assessing the impact of green supply chain management practices on the sustainable performance of the textile, automobile, and tobacco industries. The data were collected from 384 organizations and analyzed through SPSS and AMOS. The results reveal that the impact of green manufacturing, green purchases, eco-design, and green information system are significant and positive on the sustainable performance of the organizations, whereas the impact of cooperation with customers is insignificant. Similarly, the moderation of institutional pressures between green manufacturing, green purchases, eco-design, and sustainability performance is insignificant, whereas it significantly moderates between cooperation with customers, green information systems, and sustainable performance. The study is significant and novel for considering five different factors of green supply chain management (GSCM): green manufacturing, green purchasing, cooperation with customers, eco-design, and green information systems. Furthermore, adding institutional pressures as a moderator between GSCM and sustainable performance adds to the novelty and uniqueness of the research. The managerial implications have also been discussed.

Introduction

With an increasing concern for the environment as a major determinant of a company’s sustainability, it is imperative to investigate going green behaviors in the context of emerging economies. By examining both economic and non-economic aspects, a firm’s long-term performance is referred to as its values, communication, and strategies ( Schaltegger and Wagner, 2017 ). Firms’ execution of corporate social responsibility is also reflected in their long-term performance. Furthermore, the firms’ long-term viability is assessed using three main components: economic performance indicators; social performance indicators; and environmental performance indicators ( Muhammad et al., 2020 ). The sustainable performance of firms does not merely gauge their economic performance but overall sustainable development. The rising environmental challenges are capturing the attention of stakeholders of corporations due to increasing competition. Currently, businesses are concerned about the environmental consequences of their products to enhance their sustainable development. Green supply chain management practice in the manufacturing industry also contributes to enhancing the long-term values of the company ( Ananda et al., 2018 ). The industrial sector, particularly the manufacturing sector, is the main contributor to CO 2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, environmental management and green innovation are vital for the industry to deliver its corporate social responsibility. Moreover, the importance of GSCM in the sustainable performance of a firm is unambiguously supported by many studies.

Supply chain management practices are deeply linked to the satisfaction of the customers. For that purpose, it needs coordination and integration of the business framework. The business process, which must be cohesive, includes manufacturing, purchasing, marketing logistics, and information system. Therefore, the supply chain management practices focus on the customers’ responses, quality, and environmental sustainability ( De et al., 2020 ). The identification and choice of practices are necessary for having a competitive advantage at the end of supply chain management ( Ikram et al., 2018 ). Literature is filled with studies conducted on multinational organizations and large enterprises that examine the impact of green practices, such as green production and green purchasing, green logistics, green design, and green distribution on sustainable performance ( Ananda et al., 2018 ). Besides research domains, manufacturing organizations have started implementing environment-friendly management practices called green supply chain management (GSCM) practices. These practices are expected to reduce air emissions, solid wastes, effluent waste, and other toxic tangible or intangible materials in manufacturing industries. In addition, to improving performance sustainability, these practices have a strong impact on profitability and market share ( Tiwari et al., 2018 ).

In the last few years, a rapid interest in green manufacturing has been observed in both the practical and research fields of Pakistani manufacturing firms. On the operational level, green manufacturing practice focuses on the workers and machines, while on the process level, it keeps a check on control and planning, whereas the system-level practices involve implementation strategies and designs ( Govindan et al., 2015 ). According to current surveys and studies, it has been noted that business alliances and buyers are abandoning the manufacturers whose goods and services are not eco-friendly ( Gupta, 2019 ). This practice is growing quite popular among the manufacturing business and the customers. Apart from the advantages in market share and customer consumption, green manufacturing is directly linked with the sustainable performance of the organizations.

Green purchasing is another important practice under the cover of green supply chain management. In recent years, the notion of purchasing has been thought of as a bottom-line financial consideration, but recent research on purchasing practices indicates that purchasing is also deeply linked with environmental management. Globally it has been noted that the eco-friendly criteria of purchasing have a significant impact on the improved performance of organizations along with economic and environmental concerns ( Liobikienė et al., 2016 ). There are numerous green purchasing strategies that firms adopt. The strategies differ in their nature and have different impacts on the environmental behaviors of providers. It focuses on products that have more eco-friendly attributes. This strategy is highly valuable as the consumers are more likely to prefer environment-friendly products and consequentially benefit the organization in the form of increased market share ( Khoiruman and Haryanto, 2017 ).

Regarding eco-friendly products, eco-design has emerged as a significant strategy in the business management domain of Pakistan. The concept of eco-design was established by World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and since that time, it has been influencing the whole cycle of a product ( Fernando, 2017 ). The production, packaging, and distribution of products are designed according to eco-design strategies. Among all the advantages, the sustainable performance of the organization is noteworthy. As far as the sustainability performance of the firm is concerned, eco-design gives a better environmental commitment and, therefore, a momentous practice in green supply chain management.

The involvement of technology in manufacturing businesses often comes up with environmental hazards. To eliminate environmental issues, green information systems emerged as a significant practice in green supply chain management. The environment sustainability regarding the green information system includes the processes, software, and other related technologies to facilitate the sustainable performance of a firm, and support its individual, organizational, social, and environmental goals ( Recker, 2016 ). Information plays an important role in green information systems. Green information helps in product cycle analysis, environmental management, and the design of eco-friendly practices. The effectiveness of green information systems hugely depends on the IT capacities of the firm ( Anthony, 2016 ). Despite its importance in management practices, the existing research on this area is narrow and requires deep investigations so that organizations can benefit themselves with a green information system. The rising importance of GSCM practice has shifted the attention of policymakers from economic performance to sustainability performance. The reason is that later consider the wider prospects of the company’s development such as development in environmental protection. Non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations in the company negatively impacts sustainability performance. Moreover, modern statistical tests are conducted to analyze these factors that have no traces in the existing research bodies regarding the Pakistani context. Due to the limited studies available in the manufacturing context of Pakistan, the present study acknowledged the need to study these supply chain management practices in relation to sustainability performance. The role of the institution also seemed neglected in past studies; therefore, the moderating role of institutional pressure is examined in association with the GSCM practices and sustainability performance.

The study intends to cover the gap in the literature by empirically investigating the impression of the components of GSCM practices on the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan through the moderating role of institutional pressure. The study also feeds back to the literature on sustainability performance by debating how the green supply chain facilitates firms to achieve long-run sustainability performance growth. The novelty of this study is to use primary data by conducting surveys from the manufacturing sectors of Pakistan, including the textile, sugar, automobile, and tobacco industries, to explain sustainability performance through GSCM and its components. Few studies in the literature have empirically examined the impact of GSCM on, sustainability performance but research on the moderating role of institutional pressures between GSCM and sustainability performance is limited. This study objects to filling lacunas in the literature by conducting primary data on manufacturing industry sustainability performance.

The present study examines the impact of components of green supply chain management on the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry of Pakistan. The gaps in the experiential research of sustainability, performance are filled by executing the following objectives: (1) examine the impact of green manufacturing and green purchasing on the sustainability performance, (2) examine the role of cooperation of customers in the sustainability performance, (3) examine the role of eco-design and green information systems on sustainability performance, and (4) analyze the moderating role of institutional pressure on the relationship between GSCM practices and sustainability performance.

This study focuses on all the five components of green supply chain management such as green manufacturing, green purchases, cooperation with customers, eco-design, and green information systems to explain the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry of Pakistan. This research will play a key role in enunciating the policymakers about the constructive role of the green supply chain in enhancing the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry of Pakistan. The discouraging performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan is gauged on the scale of the economic downturn, whereas environmental consequences of the industry also have repercussions on sustainability performance. Provided this backdrop, this research also aims to provide an exclusive perception of how to inform policymakers and environmentalists about the role of the green supply chain in the industry’s sustainable performance. The rest of the article is structured as follows. The research article first reviews the existing literature. The second part outlines the methodology employed in the study for testing the conceptual model, and the third part of the study describes the analysis and findings. Discussion and conclusion are the end part of the research article.

Literature review

The supply chain management concept states the management of inventory, the relationship between suppliers and buyers, procurement, production, and activities associated with the production of goods ( Rao and Holt, 2005 ; Ikram et al., 2018 ). Similarly, green supply chain management refers to managing all activities in the firm by considering the environmental consequences of those activities to assure environmentally friendly production and delivery processes. Various studies in literature support the positive role of GSCM in the sustainability performance of the industry ( Awan et al., 2017 ; Khan and Qianli, 2017 ; Khan et al., 2019 ). Corporations are inclined to adapt the GSCM to enhance their competitiveness and sustainability performance ( Rao and Holt, 2005 ; Yang et al., 2013 ).

With the growing concern for the environment, reducing costs and improving quality products have become the target for various businesses. There is now a focus on green production from product development up to the management of every step of the product life cycle. The environmental practice steps may involve eco-designs, recycling processes, reuse of the products with minimal cost expenditure, and clean production ( Chavez et al., 2016 ). The literature on environmental management suggests that green operations are related to both products and their related practices of the environment. This reduces product damage and positively affects the supply chain processes involving natural resources ( Choi and Hwang, 2015 ). The capacity of an organization to carry out its environmental practices and sustainable operations is highly important for its performance output. The value of green manufacturing and production has been well recognized in the literature, but the focus on the upstream suppliers is not enough for their performance enhancement role. This supply chain management system helps reduce ecological hazards and the burden on the environment from product production and disposal. This also aids in gaining profits for the manufacturing units and gives them a competitive edge ( Arshad Ali et al., 2020 ).

In the world of today, the focus is being shifted toward organic foods, green technology, green products, and sustainable energy. Literature highlights the reasons that can be behind the purchase of these green products as why consumers buy green products or are involved in making more eco-friendly choices ( Arshad Ali et al., 2020 ). These choices provide a win-win situation for the planet and its living beings. It has also been observed that consumers are willing to buy expensive but eco-friendly products, which gives a big opportunity to the government to make policy changes that are more eco-friendly ( Peattie, 2001 ). An empirical investigation of Chinese consumers suggested that value-attitude-behavior are the three basic constructs behind any purchase behavior ( Keles and Bekimbetova, 2013 ).

Eco-design can be defined in terms of both principle and approach. It prioritizes the criteria of the protection of the environment before the life cycle of the product or service. The basic logic behind eco-designs is the minimization of environmental hazards and incorporation of eco-design in the manufacturing, usage, and disposal of products. The successive stages of a product life cycle in which eco-design can be incorporated include raw material extraction and supply, then its manufacturing, proceeding product distribution, and finally customer use. The eco-design approach adopted by the organizations starts from raw material extraction and goes up to retailers and consumers. The processes involving the product’s value chain are also included in the eco-design ( Arshad Ali et al., 2020 ). Environmental sustainability includes the human attitude and the social, organizational, and environmental perspectives, so we can say that both micro and macro issues are involved in it, as stated by Melville. There has begun research in the newly developed area of green IT but more is still to be learned ( Jenkin et al., 2011 ). The reason behind the organization choosing green IT for their systems is the reduction of costs during operating procedures and the minimization of environmental hazards caused during various business procedures ( Dedrick, 2010 ). Moreover, the bigger reasons behind the adoption of green IT are the essential benefits like employee self-esteem and good corporate citizenship. This also provides a better image of the corporate and the regulation pressure. The success of green IT services needs further research to support the arguments regarding the involvement of employees in the buy-in and the environmental initiatives ( Jenkin et al., 2011 ).

Literature mentions the institutional theory, which is helpful in the investigation of how the forces of an institution lead an organization to be receptive to the needs of others in society. Institutional pressure occurs in three different ways named as normative, mimetic, or coercive. A study on the investigation of the influence of mimetic and coercive pressures on managers’ behavior was checked after the adoption of the green information system. The organization’s response toward uncertainty when the path of action is not clear is termed mimetic isomorphism. This usually occurs when another organization adopts a policy or a technology and gets positive influence from it ( Kaur, 2021 ). Whereas coercive isomorphism responds to both formal and informal pressures from other organizations, such as those in supply chain management. Thus, we can say that the behavior of the senior managers was influenced by the adoption of the green information system because it caused pressure from higher authorities, supply chain suppliers, and consumers as well. In the regulated field, the most often seen pressure is coercive pressure. Therefore, the issues on the environment are taken as negative externalities as they force the managers appointed at senior levels to enhance the environmental performance of the organization. All the firms face coercive pressure at the same level that leads them toward regulating better adaptive procedures. Thus, the managers that adopt green IS through coercive pressure will develop positive behaviors toward it as both environmental and commercial advantages are obtained via the adoption of green IS ( Ananda et al., 2018 ).

Resource base and institutional theory

We empirically investigate the impacts of green supply chain management methods on sustainability performance, as well as the moderating effects of institutional pressure, while drowning in institutional theory and the resource-based perspective. Resource base theory is a key concept in strategic management that has gained popularity in complementary fields like supply chain management and management sub-disciplines like entrepreneurship ( Hitt et al., 2016 ; Kuenzi et al., 2019 ). Barney (2012) suggested that according to resource-based theory, supply chain management will frequently possess characteristics that enable it to be a source of long-term competitive advantage. The issue regarding the supply chain resources being upstream and internal resource development can be taken under enhanced scrutiny. Some researchers have confirmed that the attributes of resource base theory align inside the supply chain management and act as a weapon of competition. Currently, there have been struggles to categorically realize the link between RBT and consistent supply chain management ( Peattie, 2001 ). With the help of sustainability, the firms can create and develop their market image and reputation, which helps them to improve their marketability and gain immense profits from their products and services. This is essential for the organization as it enables them to gain a competitive edge against other suppliers rather than a stand-alone firm. RBT suggests that the demands and resources from which the products are made are highly valuable and hard to copy and have no alternative, thus, giving the firm’s success in the long run ( Hitt et al., 2016 ).

Hirsch (2008) suggested that the impact of the institutional environment on organizational behavior can be investigated using institutional theory. According to Oliver (1997) , the logic of the resource-based view has not inspected the social context in which resource selection decisions are entrenched. Thus, Oliver (1997) suggests a theoretical framework built on the merger of the resource-based perspective and institutional theory to solve the shortcomings of the resource-based approach. Institutional theory has been heavily utilized in the development of frameworks for green supply chains as well as the adoption of high-quality initiatives and technological applications ( Sarkis et al., 2011 ). When the incentive for the adoption of behaviors or technologies derives from legitimacy, the institutional theory provides a more comprehensive explanation ( DiMaggio and Powell, 1983 ). We argue that institutional theory, out of all organizational theories, should be the second theory chosen because it provides the best justification for the social and environmental components of supply chain sustainability performance ( Seles et al., 2016 ).

Impact of green manufacturing on sustainability performance

Green supply chain management has drawn the attention of academics and business professionals due to growing environmental concerns. Green manufacturing has some standards that need to be ensured during its manufacturing like no significant safety problems, no health coercions on the workers and product operators, and no environmental pollution, waste recycling, and waste disposal ( Gong et al., 2019 ). Green manufacturing in the industry comprises the planning of manufacturing and management to check the usage of energy, greenhouse gas emissions, likewise waste defecation. Green manufacturing works to reduce the municipal discarded by growing the efficiency of firms ( Aziziankohan et al., 2017 ). Considering the viewpoints of institutional theory and resource base theory, the following hypotheses are put out to investigate how different institutional pressures lead to firms over time integrating similar risk management practices into their supply management processes.

H1: Green manufacturing has a significant impact on the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Impact of green purchases on sustainability performance

Green purchases show the efforts put into the economic growth of a country and its development while ensuring that the sources utilized in their manufacture are still there and the environmental services. The demand for a green economy is the operational policy agenda that aids in the progress measure at the edge of both economies and the environment ( Cherian and Jacob, 2012 ). It can help in economic diversification by speeding up the rate of technological changes and sustainability performance. Green purchases practice refers to the firms’ procurement management to control the waste defecation in form. Green purchases align with the sustainability performance of firms by winning a repute in the market ( Liobikienė et al., 2016 ; Khoiruman and Haryanto, 2017 ). Moreover, green purchases facilitate the long terms sustainability performance of firms by assuring that the purchased products of firms are environment friendly ( Cherian and Jacob, 2012 ). The following hypothesis is built in light of the aforementioned studies:

H2: Green purchasing has a significant impact on the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Impact of cooperation with customers on sustainability performance

Customers are the main stakeholder of the company, which can influence the firm’s practices and production procedures ( Chavez et al., 2016 ). Customers being key economic agents, can exert pressure on firms to circumvent environmental degradation by opting for environment-friendly practices ( Dhull and Narwal, 2016 ). Strong cooperation with customers enhances the GSCM in organizations which consequently increases the efficiency and sustainability performance of firms. It is important for management to indulge all the stakeholders, particularly customers, to promote GSCM practice in a company ( Neramballi et al., 2017 ). The association between supplier evaluation and supplier selection is insignificant to sustainability performance. The factor of cooperation with customers was also considered and it was found to have a significantly negative association with sustainability performance ( Foo et al., 2018 ). According to the resource-based theory, when demand increases, performance increases, and customers are the main agents behind the demand and supply balance increase. We can say that in relevance to the RBT, cooperation with customers will significantly impact sustainability performance. Thus, based on the above literature following hypothesis is recommended:

H3: Cooperation with customers significantly impacts the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Impact of eco-design on sustainability performance

Eco-design is defined as the production process designs of firms to check the environmental degradation and negative impact on the ecosystem ( Kuo et al., 2018 ). Eco-design practices to control the environmental hazards of the production process will increase the efficiency and productivity of firms. These actions include efficient usage of friendly energy sources in the manufacturing process, which intensifies the productivity in the organizations ( Aziziankohan et al., 2017 ). The applications of green product and procedure design include using eco-friendly raw materials and eco-design that has decreased energy and material consumption. Thus, based on the above literature following hypothesis is proposed:

H4: Eco-design has defined a significant impact on the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Impact of green information systems on sustainability performance

The green information system deals with the employment of the information system to support environment-friendly operations and sustainable performance ( Recker, 2016 ; Shevchuk and Oinas-Kukkonen, 2016 ). The system optimizes the firms’ behaviors and activities toward clean energy and green innovations. The green information system is a key component of GSCM which coordinates green supply chain processes ( Seethamraju and Frost, 2019 ). The practice of green information systems increases the modest advantage and performance of firms, which positively influences sustainability performance ( Chen, 2008 ; Dao et al., 2011 ). This is because it minimizes energy consumption as compared to traditional IT systems. Green IT is far more important than just reducing energy consumption ( Dao et al., 2011 ). The resources will be shifted toward the natural ones and more focus will be given to environment-friendly manufacturing practices. Hence, on the basis of the above literature following hypothesis is recommended:

H5: Green information System has a significant impact on the relationship between the performance of the manufacturing industry.

Moderating impact of institutional pressure between green manufacturing and sustainability performance

Institutional pressures on organizations to comply with the rules and regulations to protect the environment further reinforce the connection between green manufacturing and sustainability performance ( Sarkis et al., 2011 ). Seethamraju and Frost (2019) indicated that in their study that by using data from 396 manufacturers in China to examine the link between institutional pressure and GSCM. All types of institutional pressure cause no harm yet contribute toward a win-win situation for all the organizations ( Sarkis et al., 2011 ). According to the resource-based theory, when the demand in a green supply chain increase, the resources need to be increased for better sustainability. When there is institutional pressure, organizations tend to deliver better performance in green manufacturing and green production, etc. Hence, the following hypothesis is proposed:

H6: Institutional pressure has a moderating impact between green manufacturing and sustainability performance of the manufacturing Industry in Pakistan.

The moderating impact of institutional pressure on green purchases, and sustainability performance

The institutional quality in the country will be able to exert institutional pressures on firms to adopt green purchases by recycling waste and controlling waste defecation ( Habib et al., 2021 ). The institution pressure will render the firm to show long-term sustainability performance by dealing with the environmental impacts of firms. Abid (2017) also proposed in his study that institutional quality and financial development highly matter for environmental quality and greenhouse gas emission. Green purchasing capabilities have a significant impact on GSCM practices. According to the resource-based theory, green purchases will increase the demand for green manufacturing, and thus, the firms will get a competitive edge ( Foo et al., 2018 ). The institutional pressure can significantly impact the green purchase, as discussed above, thus, the following hypothesis is suggested:

H7: Institutional pressure has a moderating impact on the relationship between green purchasing and the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Moderating the impact of institutional pressure on cooperation with customers and sustainability performance

Institutional pressure safeguards the rights of customers by assuring the compliance of the company’s rights toward key stakeholders ( Kaur, 2021 ). The company practicing the GSCM will tend to cooperate with customers to improve the company’s reputation. Moreover, good institutional quality in the country will also promote the customers’ rights by keeping an eye on the company’s conduct. The study also found that customer pressure act as a moderator in its impact on the institutional factors of cooperative practices, but it has no significant relationship with coercive practice ( David and Muthini, 2019 ). According to the resource-based theory, when the resources are enhanced, supply chain management practices are strengthened. Customer cooperation can significantly influence the sustainability performance of the firms, but the cooperation by the customer is affected by various institutional pressures, so the role of institutional pressure in this relationship can be highly significant. Therefore, in the light of above discussion following hypothesis is built:

H8: Institutional pressure has a moderating impact on the relationship between cooperation with customers and sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

Moderating the impact of institutional pressure on eco-design and sustainability performance

Institutional pressure also stresses the environment-friendly procedures of producing goods and services in the company ( Dubey et al., 2015 ). Institutional pressures on firms to circumvent inflicting hazards to the environment will also facilitate the firm to enhance its efficiency and competitiveness ( Khan and Qianli, 2017 ). It was concluded that institutional pressure has a substantial positive effect on supply chain relationship management and sustainable supply chain design and coercive pressure, normative pressure, and mimetic pressure have various levels of negative moderating impacts ( Habib et al., 2021 ). Institutional pressure has a varying degree of influence on supply chain management practices, as proved by the above-mentioned studies. Thus, the following hypothesis is proposed in light of the research mentioned above:

H9: Institutional pressure has a moderating impact on the relationship between eco-design and the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan.

The moderating impact of institutional pressure on the green information system, and sustainability performance

Institutional pressure on the company will render company to use green information systems to promote environment-friendly operations. Environment protection programs are launched in various countries, which local institutions successfully execute. Internal environmental management organizations reinforce the practice of GSCM in various industries ( Khan et al., 2019 ). According to the resource-based theory, when the resources are valuable and irreplaceable, it gives the firm a competitive advantage. The implementation of green IS in the green supply chain management practice will help in the development of sustainability performance, but various levels of institutional pressure will influence it and this impact can be highly significant ( David and Muthini, 2019 ). Based on the results of the literature, the study suggests the following hypothesis:

H10: Institutional pressure has a moderating impact on the relationship between the green information system and the sustainability performance of the manufacturing industry in Pakistan. In light of the above discussion, the theoretical framework of the study has been depicted in Figure 1 .

Figure 1. Theoretical framework.

Research methodology

Population and sampling are the major concerns to be looked at by the researcher while collecting the data for the research process. The population is the targeted respondents from whom the researcher would collect the data. The population is the observed set of respondents from which the researcher had to select the sample for studying ( Van Blerkom, 2008 ). As the population in this study is unknown, it is recommended by Krejcie and Morgan (1970) , the sample size for this type of population be 384. In the present study, a survey strategy was adopted to collect the data from the respondents through a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire used was adopted from the previous studies, and it was used after being examined by experienced professionals in the research field.

Data analysis and results

To empirically explore the relationship of GSCM with sustainable performance, the study used descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). Descriptive analysis was performed by using the software SPSS in which descriptive statistics are calculated for variables, including mean, median, mode, and standard deviation. However, to test the structural relationship among the variable, the SEM technique is performed by using the software of AMOS. The CFA is a multivariate empirical analysis technique used in this study to measure the relationship of the variables with latent variables in which convergent and discriminant validity is measured. Moreover, regression analysis is also done.

Confirmatory factor analysis

Table 1 shows the results of the confirmatory factor analysis, and the values for the goodness of fit index, CMIN value, incremental fit index, competitive fit index, and root mean square error of approximation are presented below:

Table 1. Model fitness indices.

The threshold value for CMIN to be less than or equal to 3; In this case, it can be observed that the observed value is 1.788, which is exactly according to the threshold value, in the case of the value of the goodness of fit index, the value should be more than or equal to 0.80, and in this case, the value is 0.849, which is exactly according to the threshold value. Whereas the value for root mean square error of approximation should be less than 0.08 or equal to 0.08, and in this case, it is equal to 0.049, which depicts the reliability, convergent, and discriminant validities. Figure 2 represents the screenshot of the confirmatory factor analysis.

Figure 2. Confirmatory factor analysis.

Structural equation modeling

Table 2 represents the results of structural equation modeling; a multivariate statistical analysis method was applied to check for the structural relationships present between the variables.

Table 2. Structural equation modeling.

Figure 3 shows the path diagram of the structural equation modeling that represents the direct impacts of the variables and the indirect impacts of the variables on each other.

Figure 3. Structural equation modeling.

Conclusion and implications of the study

The research aims to know about the impact of green manufacturing, green purchases, cooperation with customers, and green information systems on sustainable performance. The study aims to study sustainable performance with respect to the organization and the operating activities of the business as well. Moreover, the current study has taken out the moderating concept of institutional pressure. The study has taken sustainable performance as a dependent variable. For the sake of checking the results, the study has proposed some hypotheses as well. First, the study has proposed that the “Impact of green manufacturing on sustainability performance is significant.” This hypothesis was accepted by the researchers. The results of the study have highlighted that with an increase in green manufacturing the sustainability performance of organizations can be enhanced significantly. Abdul-Rashid et al. (2017) argued that production wastage and improper manufacturing are causing different problems for society. That is why the researcher has appreciated incorporating green manufacturing in the production processes to attain sustainable performance throughout the business processes.

Furthermore, different studies have quoted that sustainability performance can also result in economically sound and beneficial for organizations as well. However, another study by Cankaya and Sezen (2018) suggested that green manufacturing can play a role significantly for future growth. The practices of green manufacturing can also establish future certainty and will also help in cutting the cost and the wastage of production will be lower as well. This relationship has been supported by prior studies as well. The study of Chin et al. (2015) suggested that in the growth of an economy, green purchase plays a significant role, as it has got significant importance in the recent decade with respect to scholarly studies.

Moreover, De et al. (2020) explained that in the economic development of any economy green purchases also played a moderating role as it involves futuristic practices which can be adopted by any organization that is looking for sustainability that is why the researcher has considered this relationship as significant and positive. The third hypothesis proposed by the study was that the “impact of cooperation with customers on sustainability performance is significant.” This hypothesis was rejected by the study because of the insignificant value shown by the analysis of this hypothesis. This statement was accepted by the results that have shown the positive value of the relationship. The study has taken the supporting literature on this relationship, explaining that eco-design can be recognized as a design for environmental safety and production publicity concurrently. Furthermore, eco-design can be considered a design for environmental or green design of the organizational processes to minimize the effects of business processes on the environment and society.

Pigosso et al. (2014) found that incorporating eco-design into each business operation can improve sustainability performance. The researcher investigated the impact of the green information system on sustainability and offered a hypothesis that was accepted by the study. The study suggests that the moderating influence of institutional pressure on green manufacturing and sustainability performance is important. Rodrigues et al. (2016) found institutional pressures on businesses to follow rules and regulations to preserve the environment from additional harm, as well as a link between green manufacturing and sustainability performance. The study of Schöggl et al. (2017) highlighted institutional pressure on firms to adopt green purchases by recycling and wasting waste defecation. Moreover, they highlighted that the institutional pressure would render the firms to show that this pressure cannot lead to higher sustainability performance in the long run. Zaid et al. (2018) proposed that good institutional pressure on quality will also promote the factor of cooperation with customers and this will cause better sustainability performance with respect to institutional stake in the organizations. Future researchers can examine the theory of planned behavior in the context of green purchase behavior. Moreover, it might be interesting to examine the potential role of sustainability and digital transition issues with respect to going green, as suggested in the recent literature ( Centobelli et al., 2020 , 2022 ; Cerchione and Bansal, 2020 ).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants or patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Ghazilla, R. A. R., and Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37, 182–204. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abid, M. (2017). Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. J. Environ. Manag. 188, 183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ananda, A. R. W., Astuty, P., and Nugroho, Y. C. (2018). Role of green supply chain management in embolden competitiveness and performance: Evidence from Indonesian organizations. Int. J. Supp. Chain Manag. 7, 437–442.

Google Scholar

Anthony, B. J. (2016). Green information systems integration in information technology based organizations: An academic literature review. J. Soft Comput. Decis. Supp. Syst. 3, 45–66.

Arshad Ali, A., Mahmood, A., Ikram, A., and Ahmad, A. (2020). Configuring the drivers and carriers of process innovation in manufacturing organizations. J. Open Innov. 6:154. doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040154

Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., and Huiskonen, J. (2017). Understanding the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainability performance in manufacturing firms in Pakistan. Proc. Manuf. 11, 768–777. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.178

Aziziankohan, A., Jolai, F., Khalilzadeh, M., Soltani, R., and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017). Green supply chain management using the queuing theory to handle congestion and reduce energy consumption and emissions from supply chain transportation fleet. J. Indust. Eng. Manag. 10, 213–236. doi: 10.3926/jiem.2170

Barney, J. B. (2012). Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory. J. Suppl. Chain Manag. 48, 3–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03265.x

Cankaya, S. Y., and Sezen, B. (2018). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. J. Manufact. Technol. Manag. 30, 98–121. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099

Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., and Ertz, M. (2020). Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies. Bus. Strategy Environ. 29, 1215–1246. doi: 10.1002/bse.2428

Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Oropallo, E., El-Garaihy, W. H., Farag, T., and Al Shehri, K. H. (2022). Towards a sustainable development assessment framework to bridge supply chain practices and technologies. Sustain. Dev. 30, 647–663. doi: 10.1002/sd.2262

Cerchione, R., and Bansal, H. (2020). Measuring the impact of sustainability policy and practices in tourism and hospitality industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 29, 1109–1126. doi: 10.1002/bse.2420

Chavez, R., Yu, W., Feng, M., and Wiengarten, F. (2016). The effect of customer-centric green supply chain management on operational performance and customer satisfaction. Bus. Strategy Environ. 25, 205–220. doi: 10.1002/bse.1868

Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. J. Bus. Ethics 77, 271–286. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1

Cherian, J., and Jacob, J. (2012). Green marketing: A study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly products. Asian Soc. Sci. 8, 117–126. doi: 10.5539/ass.v8n12p117

Chin, T. A., Tat, H. H., and Sulaiman, Z. (2015). Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance. Procedia Cirp 26, 695–699. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035

Choi, D., and Hwang, T. (2015). The impact of green supply chain management practices on firm performance: The role of collaborative capability. Operat. Manag. Res. 8, 69–83. doi: 10.1007/s12063-015-0100-x

Dao, V., Langella, I., and Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. J. Strateg. Inform. Syst. 20, 63–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.002

David, R., and Muthini, J. (2019). Influence of green supply chain management practices on procurement performance of private health institutions in Kenya: A case of aga khan hospital kisumu. Strateg. J. Bus. Change Manag. 6, 1378–1396.

De, D., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., and Ghosh, S. K. (2020). Impact of lean and sustainability oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A data envelopment analysis-based framework. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 219, 416–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.003

Dedrick, J. (2010). Green IS: Concepts and issues for information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 27:11. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.02711

Dhull, S., and Narwal, M. (2016). Drivers and barriers in green supply chain management adaptation: A state-of-art review. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 4, 61–76. doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2015.7.003

DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 40, 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., and Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 160, 120–132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.001

Fernando, Y. (2017). An empirical analysis of eco-design of electronic products on operational performance: Does environmental performance play role as a mediator? Int. J. Bus. Innovat. Res. 14, 188–205. doi: 10.1504/IJBIR.2017.086285

Foo, P.-Y., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G. W.-H., and Ooi, K.-B. (2018). A gateway to realising sustainability performance via green supply chain management practices: A PLS–ANN approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 107, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.013

Gong, R., Xue, J., Zhao, L., Zolotova, O., Ji, X., and Xu, Y. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of green supply chain management based on the Web of Science (WOS) platform. Sustainability 11, 3459. doi: 10.3390/su11123459

Govindan, K., Diabat, A., and Shankar, K. M. (2015). Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach. J. Clean. Prod. 96, 182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.054

Gupta, K. (2019). Innovations In Manufacturing For Sustainability. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-03276-0

Habib, M. A., Bao, Y., Nabi, N., Dulal, M., and Asha, A. A. (2021). Impact of strategic orientations on the implementation of green supply chain management practices and sustainable firm performance. MDPI 13:340. doi: 10.3390/su13010340

Hirsch, P. M. (2008). “Been there, done that, moving on: Reflections on institutional theory’s continuing evolution,” in Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , eds R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and E. Andersson (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), 783–789. doi: 10.4135/9781849200387.n34

Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., and Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. J. Operat. Manag. 41, 77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.002

Ikram, A., Su, Q., Fiaz, M., and Rehman, R. U. (2018). Cluster strategy and supply chain management: The road to competitiveness for emerging economies. Benchmarking 25, 1302–1318. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2015-0059

Jenkin, T. A., Webster, J., and McShane, L. (2011). An agenda for ‘Green’information technology and systems research. Inform. Organ. 21, 17–40. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.09.003

Kaur, K. (2021). The effect of green product design and institutional pressures on manufacturing firms performances in malaysia : Implementation of reverse logistics products. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 6, 12–30. doi: 10.47604/ijscm.1292

Keles, I., and Bekimbetova, T. (2013). Measuring attitudes towards ‘Green’purchases: A study of university students in Kyrgyzstan. Univ. J. Indust. Bus. Manag. 1, 46–49. doi: 10.13189/ujibm.2013.010204

Khan, S. A. R., Jian, C., Yu, Z., Golpîra, H., and Kumar, A. (2019). “Impact of green practices on Pakistani manufacturing firm performance: A path analysis using structural equation modeling Computational intelligence and sustainable systems,” in Computational Intelligence and Sustainable Systems , (Springer), 87–97. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02674-5_6

Khan, S. A. R., and Qianli, D. (2017). Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: An empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 16829–16844. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9172-5

Khoiruman, M., and Haryanto, A. T. (2017). Green purchasing behavior analysis of government policy about paid plastic bags. Indonesian J. Sustain. Account. Manag. 1, 31–39. doi: 10.28992/ijsam.v1i1.25

Krejcie, R. V., and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 30, 607–610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308

Kuenzi, M., Brown, M. E., Mayer, D. M., and Priesemuth, M. (2019). Supervisor-subordinate (dis) agreement on ethical leadership: An investigation of its antecedents and relationship to organizational deviance. Bus. Ethics Quart. 29, 25–53. doi: 10.1017/beq.2018.14

Kuo, T. C., Tseng, M.-L., Lin, C. H., Wang, R.-W., and Lee, C.-H. (2018). Identifying sustainable behavior of energy consumers as a driver of design solutions: The missing link in eco-design. J. Clean. Prod. 192, 486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.250

Liobikienė, G., Mandravickaitė, J., and Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study. Ecol. Econ. 125, 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.008

Muhammad, F., Ikram, A., Jafri, S. K., and Naveed, K. (2020). Product innovations through ambidextrous organizational culture with mediating effect of contextual ambidexterity: An empirical study of IT and telecom firms. J. Open Innovat. 7:9. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7010009

Neramballi, A., Sequeira, M., Rydell, M., Vestin, A., and Ibarra, M. (2017). “A comprehensive literature review of green supply chain management,” Paper presented at the 2nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE Congress 2017), Barcelona, Spain, April 2-4, 2017. (Barcelona) doi: 10.11159/icesdp17.176

Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strateg. Manag. J. 18, 697–713. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C

Peattie, K. (2001). Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer. Bus. Strategy Environ. 10, 187–199. doi: 10.1002/bse.292

Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., and Rozenfeld, H. (2014). “Systematization of best practices for ecodesign implementation,” Paper presented at the DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference. (Glasgow)

Rao, P., and Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int. J. Operat. Prod. Manag. 25, 898–916. doi: 10.1108/01443570510613956

Recker, J. (2016). “Toward a design theory for green information systems,” Paper presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Koloa, HI: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.556

Rodrigues, V. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., and McAloone, T. C. (2016). Process-related key performance indicators for measuring sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation into product development. J. Clean. Prod. 139, 416–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.046

Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., and Lai, K.-H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 130, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010

Schaltegger, S., and Wagner, M. (eds) (2017). “Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability: Capturing the relationship between sustainability performance, business competitiveness and economic performance,” in Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance (London: Routledge), 1–27. doi: 10.4324/9781351280525-1

Schöggl, J.-P., Baumgartner, R. J., and Hofer, D. (2017). Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 1602–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195

Seethamraju, R. C., and Frost, G. (2019). “Deployment of Information Systems for Sustainability Reporting and Performance,”. 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2019, Cancún, Mexico, August 15-17, 2019 (Atlanta, GA)

Seles, B. M. R. P., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., and Dangelico, R. M. (2016). The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182, 342–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.033

Shevchuk, N., and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2016). “Exploring green information systems and technologies as persuasive systems: A systematic review of applications in published research,” In CIS 2016 Proceedings. (Dublin)

Tiwari, S., Wee, H.-M., and Daryanto, Y. (2018). Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: Insights to industries. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115, 319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.017

Van Blerkom, M. (2008). Measurement and Statistics for Teachers. Berlin: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203887868

Yang, C.-S., Lu, C.-S., Haider, J. J., and Marlow, P. B. (2013). The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part E 55, 55–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005

Zaid, A. A., Jaaron, A. A., and Bon, A. T. (2018). The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study. J. Clean. Prod. 204, 965–979. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.062

Keywords : green supply chain management practices, sustainability performance, institutional pressure, green manufacturing, green information system

Citation: Ahmad A, Ikram A, Rehan MF and Ahmad A (2022) Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Front. Psychol. 13:973676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973676

Received: 20 June 2022; Accepted: 25 October 2022; Published: 15 November 2022.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2022 Ahmad, Ikram, Rehan and Ahmad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Amir Ikram, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Green supply chain management/green finance: a bibliometric analysis of the last twenty years by using the Scopus database

Faryal fahim.

Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor Malaysia

Batiah Mahadi

Associated data.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Mostly, the product manufacturer and activities related to transportation have a greater influence on the supply chain and the environment. Hence, the green investment in water, biodiversity protection, waste treatment, resources, and climate change alleviation help in enhancing industrial production. Thus, for the enhancement of green growth, the industries must adopt green financing by making investments in ecology, climate change, and carbon reduction. Despite having the greatest growth in green supply chain management, still, the implementations of greening the product and processes have not been seen properly in many industries. A bibliometric analysis was conducted through VOS viewer version 1.6.7. of last twenty years (2001–2021). A total of 2385 articles were retrieved from the Scopus database. The results revealed that China, India, Iran, and Taiwan have a vast collection of articles and have very strong international collaborations. The most cited authors were Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., and Khan, S.A.R. The results also suggest that green supply chain management research was related to the field of engineering, environmental science, energy sciences, social sciences, and business management. Some new areas are discovered like green innovation, green information technology, green productivity, corporate environmental responsibility, green investments, green credit, and green credit policy. As evidenced from our bibliographic database search, it is observed that integrated work on green supply chain management and green finance is limited, and this makes this research work to be novel. This study is beneficial for credit managers and policymakers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-022-21764-z.

Introduction

Global warming is considered an essential challenge for any activity that is related to finance or economics. All the damages to the supply chain or firms’ assets that are caused by climate change have become the main reasons for the transition and physical risks; the only way to treat these transition risks is to follow low carbon family (Stern 2013 ; Burke et al. 2015 ; Elie et al. 2021a ). Literature shows that the fossil fuels higher ratio leads to a hazardous scenario. In this situation, this is best to cut down global warming by 2 °C by keeping the economy at low carbon. The low carbon reduction further brings up a new challenge that includes a reduction in carbon emissions by adopting sustainable renewable energies and greater energy preservation (Elie et al. 2021a ).

Globally sustainability and climate change have gained vast attention; the leaders from all over the world discussed the Paris Agreement 2015 under the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) and realized the urgent need to mitigate the issue of greenhouse gas emissions. The member countries of the United Nations have agreed to work together; one of the biggest challenges the member country realized is to finance the actions that should be taken to mitigate climate change and sustainability. It has been observed that a significant amount is required for maintaining 2 °C temperature which is estimated at a $53 trillion investment in energy-related products by 2035 (Zhang et al. 2019 ). In 2010, 194 countries have established the GCF (Green Climate Fund) intending to financially support those countries that involve themselves in mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions, after that the term green finance appeared in most places in international firms (Zhang et al. 2019 ).

However, green finance and climate finance are mixed and both terms are taken as the same, the term green finance has still been defined ambiguously. Sometimes authors and scholars considered it very challenging to describe the concept clearly. The concept of green finance is related to the investments that give environmental benefits to society (Zhang et al. 2019 ). However, UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) has described the term green finance as “all the financing from locals, public, private and financial intermediaries should be in support with mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, and adaptation of all actions that address the problem of climate change.” Sometimes the term green finance-related to coping with climate change and sometimes it is related to sustainability (Zhang et al. 2019 ).

The investments in environmentally friendly products and processes urge the manufacturer to adopt green finance practices. This increases the need to involve the manufacturer in green supply chain management. Despite having the enormous potential of a green supply chain, many firms and manufacturers still face so many difficulties to achieve their goals. Many small and medium enterprises are unable to promote green supply chain management. Now, industries are linking their supplier environmental performance to green supply chain management. Green supply chain management plays a crucial role, the environment has an impact at all stages of the product and supply chain, where green supply chain management can be taken as a new approach to accomplish an environmentally friendly atmosphere (Yang et al. 2021 ).

After the 1990s revolution in the supply chain, the companies have changed their framework for environmental performance; for the best results, most companies have included the sustainability goals in their vision, further they realized that it is also necessary to integrate the environmental management practices into all departments of the organizations (Maditati et al. 2018 ). Environmentally friendly is not related to driving the costs only but it is also related to creating value for businesses and advancing the financial performance of the organizations (Zhu and Sarkis 2004 ; Maditati et al. 2018 ). From this viewpoint, organizations are now moving toward the implications of green supply chain management (GSCM) in their strategic decisions which are validated by (Sarkis 2003 ).

On the other hand, green finance is the reason to stop those businesses that do not adhere to the rules of a friendly environment (Scarpellini et al. 2018 ; Yu et al. 2021a ). Thus, it brings enormous attention to academicians (Bolderdijk et al. 2013 ; Yu et al. 2021a ). Scientific pieces of evidence depict that green finance is surrounded by renewable energy (Guertler 2012 ), technological eco-innovations (Ghisetti et al. 2017 ), hygienic production (Scarpellini et al. 2018 ), green transportation (Greene 2011 ), green constructions (Chan et al. 2018 ), use of land, prevention of pollution and control (Sun et al. 2019 ), waste and water management (Pan et al. 2015 ), sustainability and supply management (Fletcher et al. 2019 ), and adaptation of climate change (Winkler and Dubash 2016 ; Yu et al. 2021a ). However, regardless of these many advances, still previous and existing studies are dispersed and fragmented in their research approach and prospect (Zhang et al. 2019 ; Yu et al. 2021a ). Hence, this bibliometric study addresses the research calls made by academic actors to bring clarity to the green finance phenomenon in the context of green supply chain management, arguing that this topic, which is gaining attention, requires to be analyzed, organized, and synthetized. Previous studies show that the phenomenon lacks a clear understanding which is important to analyze as the concept has the potential to address the climate crisis and the well-being of humanity through the financing of public and private green investments (Chien et al. 2021 ; Wang et al. 2021 ; Zhou et al. 2021 ; Madaleno et al. 2022 ).

Thus, this gives the motivation of the study to explore the phenomenon, evolution of the concept, proper current understanding, and future research directions towards green finance in the vast sagacity. This study focuses mainly on green supply chain management and green finance concerning environmental performances. Previous studies used subjective approaches which could create prejudice against green supply chain management, that’s why current authors feel to present this research with objective approaches as well. The principal research questions that the current study addresses are as follows;

• RQ1: What are the main journals that contributed to green supply chain management?
• RQ2: What is the trend in Publications on green supply chain management?
• RQ3: Which countries and institutions are the top contributors?
• RQ4: Which subject areas have been associated more with green supply chain management?
• RQ5: Who are the most influential authors of green supply chain management?
• RQ6: Is the green finance theme used more often with green supply chain management?
• RQ7: Which key terms are used more frequently in green supply chain management?
• RQ8: What is the best conceptual framework to understand the core theme of green finance/ green supply chain management?

Thus, the main objective of the paper is to analyze the extant literature on green supply chain management and propose and develop an understanding of green finance/green supply chain management along with its future direction. In this context, this study uses bibliometric analysis which is an effective method for an in-depth analysis of current research trends and understanding of the emerging new research extents. By analyzing bibliometric analysis, it becomes easy for the scholars to determine the existing research trends and development of a concept for future use by identifying the characteristics of the specific topic, authors, categories, publications, keywords, citation analysis, and references (Chen 2015 ; Elie et al. 2021b ; Yu et al. 2021b ).

The recent paper flinches with the succinct present literature review, to draw a picture of specific scholars’ research. By analyzing the current trends, this research will lead us to the understanding of the concept, development of the conceptual issues, major important terms that are associated with green finance, emerging concepts that link with green finance, new dimensions, and new concepts that need to be given consideration, and further, it will also help us to generate future directions with full guidance. Therefore, the objectives of the paper were (i) to analyze patterns of journal distribution; (ii) to show the productive author’s contribution to their academic associations and leading countries; (iii) to figure out common concepts and understandings; (iv) to identify the dominance of countries; (v) to identify the core areas that have been associated with green supply chain management; (vi) to figure out the theme of green finance with green supply chain management; (vii) to develop the conceptual framework to understand the concept of green finance/green supply chain management; (viii) and to provide prospective association and future research directions. This paper will be valuable to scholars, policymakers, investors, and individuals to understand the trends in green finance and make constructive contributions to future research.

The current paper is structured as Section 2 defines the methodology of the research and source of data, and Section 3 describes the key results or findings (relevant top 10 journal publication/distribution, top 15 authors, authors’ country of origin, keyword analysis, citation analysis, research trends), and conceptual framework of the study whereas Section 4 discusses the conclusion, describes the Policy recommendations, implications, and future directions of the study.

Bibliometric studies are the mechanistic studies that help in understanding the research areas globally in a specific field. It is based on the existing literature that is on databases. This differentiates the bibliometric paper from a review paper which intends to discuss the challenges, current progress, and future directions of a topic.

Data source and search strategy

The data extraction was conducted between November 2 nd and 7 th 2021 by using the Scopus database. Previous research has shown that the Scopus database is the largest abstract and citation database for academic reputed research papers and is more appropriate for bibliometric analysis. Likewise, the Scopus database has been chosen for this research as it centers on research studies from cross-disciplinary fields, such as Life Sciences, Health Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Social Sciences. Hence, it provides a broader coverage of relevant papers (Bag et al. 2018 ; Gao et al. 2021 ). This study distinguishes itself from existing studies as it links green finance with green supply chain management by highlighting the critical role of green finance in achieving GSCM performance.

The principal concept that was in the search was related to “green,” with “finance,” credit, trade-credit, and supply chain. The publications that were involved were from the year 2001 till 2021. The search string that was used for the first search was TITLE-ABS-KEY (  "green credit" OR "green finance" OR "green trade-credit" OR "green supply chain" OR "green supply chain finance" ); this results in a total of 3545 articles. The second search was TITLE-ABS (  "green credit" OR "green finance" OR "green trade-credit" OR "green supply chain" OR "green supply chain finance" ). This results in 2606 articles. The current authors found that these search results have 52 articles that were not in English, and then the current authors applied English limits and found 2554 articles were relevant. After that in the fourth search, the current authors limit the search to publication years from 2001 to 2021 and found 2385 useful articles. The current study has excluded all review papers and included journal articles, book chapters, and conference papers.

The search result of the primary theme was analyzed based on the author, source, year, document type, country, subject area, and affiliation. The indicators of our bibliometric study used for grading were total citations, total publication, CiteScore, and h-index. We have used the theme to explore more about green finance uses. The major terms were (i) green credit; (ii) green supply chain; (iii) green supply chain finance; and (iv) green trade-credit. In addition to this, we have selected those articles that specifically related to sustainability, that’s why we used (sustainable*). For this, we have restricted our themes and sub-themes to the environment, energy science, economics, earth, sociology, engineering, and businesses. The overall process for all the inclusion and exclusion criteria is summarized in Fig.  1 .

Flowchart of gathering data of publications for inclusion and exclusion criteria

Bibliometric maps

The pieces of information regarding citation, author keywords, and bibliography of 2385 articles were analyzed through VOSviewer version 1.6.7. Access to Scopus was granted by the University Technology Malaysia. VOSviewer is a tool that is specially made for creating bibliographic maps. The bibliographic maps include items; the current study has taken items (related to author keywords or countries) for its best interest. If there is a link or connection form between any items, it is represented by a numerical value, if the value is positive; it means the association between those items is positive and strong. If the two authors work together and form a research paper, belonging to a different territory, then the co-authorship analysis is useful for indicating the publication status of the affiliated two countries. Similarly, co-occurrence analysis is useful for the link strength of author keywords that appears together in a publication.

Key results and findings

Publication output and growth of research interest.

A total of 2385 articles had been published during the last 20 years (Fig.  2 ). The oldest year that the current analysis had taken was 2001 and the most recent was 2021. In 2001, there were only three publications, in 2002, there were only five publications, then 2003, it was eight publications, in 2005, it was 25, 2006 had 39 publications, further, it grows to 53 publications in 2007, then the tremendous shift has been seen from 2010. The cumulative publications that had been recorded under Scopus in 2021 were 2385. The peak period was from 2017 to 2021 had observed in the current analysis. As it has been seen that it was increasing to 300 publications per year, hence, the study can be anticipated it will grow in future by the same number. However, most of the articles were not accessed freely, users have to pay to get the relevant information. This is proven by the total publication categorized in the following subject area: Business Management & Accounting (1210 articles), Engineering (995 articles), Environmental Sciences (728 articles), Decision Sciences (560 articles), Energy (427 articles), Social sciences (417 articles), Economics, Econometrics & Finance (291 articles), Earth and Planetary Sciences (78 articles), Materials and Sciences (66 articles), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (49 articles), Psychology (15 articles), and Pharmacology, Taxonomy and Pharmaceutics (seven articles). According to the analysis, the most significant part of published articles was associated with the Business, Management, Accounting, Engineering, and Environmental sciences subject areas (Fig.  3 ).

The annual and cumulative numbers of research articles on Green Finance Indexed in Scopus from 2001 until 2021

The total number of research articles by subject areas related to “green supply chain or green finance” Indexed in Scopus from 2001 until 2021

Results also indicated that the articles used in the current study were published in five different languages including English: English (2385; 99%), Croatian (2; 0.00083%), French (1; 0.00041%), Russian (1; 0.00041%), and Spanish (1; 0.00041%).

Preferred journals

The results revealed that the topmost 10 productive journals were owned by the seven different publishers group (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). The topmost journal is associated with Elsevier named Journal of Cleaner Production. Out of ten, four journals of Elsevier were contributed towards “green supply chain,” “green finance,” or “green supply chain finance.” Other journals related to Emerald Publishing group, one journal associated with Taylor & Francis, one journal associated with Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), one journal belonged to Springer Nature, rest were associated with Excelling Tech Publishers and IOP Publishing Ltd.

The topmost productive journals on green finance or green supply chain research with the most cited articles

T(P) total publications, T(C) total citations, SNIP source-normalized impact per paper, SJR (Scimago Journal Rank)

The most prolific journal was the Journal of Cleaner Production with the highest number of publications (170 publications), it has the highest 2021 CiteScore of 14.1. The Journal of Cleaner Production has the highest number of citations (14,787) and falls under the quartile 1 category with the 97 th percentile. Out of ten journals, eight journals fall under the quartile 1 category (Q1), except for the International Journal of Supply Chain Management which has fallen under Q3. Rest IOP Conference Series on Earth and Environmental Science fall under Q4. The journal of Sustainability belongs to MDPI has (155) publications with a CiteScore of 3.9, and has also a good number of total citations (1540). Three journals had a CiteScore of 10 and above. However, an International Journal of Supply Chain Management has existed with CiteScore 1.0. and Iop Conference Series on Earth and Environmental Science have a CiteScore of 0.6 which is less than one but still, it was number seven in the list out of ten because of the greater number of publications (32 publications).

Further, the International Journal of Production Economies of Elsevier has the second-highest number of total citations (5989) with the second-highest h-Index of 36. The International Journal of Production research belonging to Taylor & Francis has the third-highest number of total citations (3567) and also has the third-highest h-Index 24 but still, both journals have fallen in the Q1 category under Scopus. The most cited title belonged to the Journal of Cleaner Production (A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management), it has been cited 895 times as compared to other titles. The second most cited title was (Performance measurement for green supply chain management), which belonged to Benchmarking Journal Emerald group of publishers, it has been cited 889 times as compared to the other cited titles. The third most cited title was (Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation), which belonged to the (International Journal Of Production Economics) and has been cited 761 times.

The journal’s quality was also assessed through AJG (Academic Journal Guide) 2021. The AJG assigns ranking grades based on the quality of the journal to all the management and business journals. Their ranking ranges from 1, 2, 3, to 4 grades. Grade 4 refers to the highest quality whereas grade 1 refers to the lowest quality of the journal. Most academicians and scholars of finance and management consider AJG ranking for the evaluation of the journals (Sahi et al. 2022 ). The results indicated in Table ​ Table1 1 that out of the top 10 journals, 5 journals fall under the AJG ranking list 2021, The highest-ranking journal Q1 Journal of Cleaner Production only falls under the ranking grade 2 in AJG list 2021, whereas top-notch journals International Journal of Production Economics, The International Journal of Production Research, and Transportation Research Part E Logistics And Transportation Review which are the part of Q1 falls under ranking grade 3 under AJG list 2021, whereas Benchmarking journal falls under ranking 1 which is the lowest grade quality in AJG list 2021. This suggests that half of the study’s total publications (317 publications) on green supply chain management have been published in ranked journals, whereas half of the studies (325 publications) on green supply chain management have been published in non-ranked journals according to AJG 2021.

Moreover, a CiteScore can affect authors’ decision in selecting the journals; however, authors should consider the quality of work along with the specific details of whether the journal depicts correct work to the right audience and its progress in the specific field. Elsevier-Scopus uses CiteScore and Clarivate Analytics uses the Impact factor. Both are the metrics used to measure the impact of the journal based on the citations (Md Khudzari et al. 2018 ).

SNIP (Source-Normalized Impact Per Paper) i s used to compare different journals in their subject fields. SNIP ratio is based on the citation potential, citation potential is the number of citations that a journal would expect to receive in a specific subject field. From Table ​ Table1, 1 , it has been clear that the topmost journal was (the International Journal Of Production Economics) in the economics subject field according to its SNIP (2.792), Second topmost journal according to SNIP was (Transportation Research Part E Logistics And Transportation Review) its SNIP (2.485) also related to the economics. The third most productive journal according to the SNIP (2.396) was the (International Journal Of Production Research), Thus, it is depicted that the number of citations of the journal that are related to green supply chain finance is mostly related to the economics subject field.

SJR (Scimago Journal Rank) is used to measure journal prestige, it is used to compare journals in a different discipline. Scimago uses the Scopus database to give a certain rank to the journal in the different subject areas through quartiles. According to the SJR from (Table ​ (Table1), 1 ), it has been clear that the (Journal of Cleaner Production) has the greater SJR ratio (2.475). The second journal according to the SJR ratio (2.406) was (the International Journal Of Production Economics). The third journal according to SJR ratio (2.042) was (Transportation Research Part E Logistics And Transportation Review). Thus, it is depicted that the above-stated three journals have a higher SJR ratio in their disciplines.

Leading countries, top institutions, and international collaboration

Figure  4 shows the top ten most productive countries that contributed to the growth of green supply chain management across the world. India contributed about 78.40%, Iran contributed about 68.63%, and Taiwan and China contributed about 66%. It can be established that these four countries are the main contributor globally. China was the foremost country that had started the publications related to green supply chain or green finance with 802 publications in a total of 132 journals. India was ranked the second most prolific country with 301 publications. Among the ten countries India, China, Taiwan, and Iran had more than 2/3 of single country publications (SCP). This established that these four countries have very strong intra-country collaborations. On the other hand, Australia and the UK were the countries that have the least SCP with 25%. The most benefit of international collaboration is not limited to networking, knowledge, and expertise sharing but also it’s a useful strategy for enhancing a ranking globally (Md Khudzari et al. 2018 ).

The top ten most productive countries and academic institutions in green supply chain finance or green finance. TPc, total publication of a given country; TPi, total publication of given academic institutions; SCP, single-country publication

Moreover, the China University of Mining and Technology has a total of 18 publications and is ranked in the first position among the top ten institutions that produced great work on green supply chain management. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee has a total of 14 publications, and despite having (383 ranking positions) in the QS university ranking 2021, this Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee ranked in the second position among the top ten countries/academic institutions. The University of Sydney listed at (the top 40 th ranking position) in the QS university ranking 2021 has produced a total of 4 publications. Despite having the least single country publication, the authors from the University of Sydney have produced ample work related to green supply chain management. The University of Sains Malaysia has contributed 56.59% and ranked in 6 th position among the top ten institutions according to the analysis, it produced a total of 17 publications. The University of Sains Malaysia is in (142 ranking position) in the QS university ranking 2021. It proves that GSCM (green supply chain management) has received attention from top universities across the globe.

The distribution of countries is shown in Fig.  5 . The countries which are closer to each other can be found having a thicker line between each other. Co-authorship results revealed that China was the topmost affiliated country that has linked to 46 countries with 375 times co-authorship. The second most affiliated country was the UK which has linked to 43 countries with 220 co-authorships. The third most affiliated country was the USA which has linked to 38 countries with 230 co-authorships. Rest India also has some good links with other countries (33 links and 111 co-authorships), Malaysia (31 links and 111 co-authorships), Taiwan (17 links and 66 co-authorships), Indonesia (17 links and 44 co-authorships), and Pakistan has also a good affiliation with (29 countries and 85 co-authorships). It is also established by the results that all top affiliated countries have published the work related to green supply chain management in the year 2017.

a A screenshot of the bibliometric map created based on co-authorship with overlay visualization mode. The following URL can be used to open Fig. 5 in VOSviewer: https://bit.ly/3rnGHUZ . b A screenshot of the bibliometric map created based on co-authorship with network visualization mode. The following URL can be used to open Fig. 5b in VOSviewer: https://bit.ly/3Jy5BHB

Further, results revealed that (Fig.  5a, b ) a total of 11 clusters were found in country co-authorship, and a total of 1209 co-authorship among 397 countries were established; the explanations of each cluster have been discussed as follows:

Cluster 1 (red)

It includes 11 countries named Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Indonesia, Kuwait, Malaysia, Pakistan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. In cluster 1, the topmost publications related to the green supply chain belonged to Malaysia which has linked with 31 countries, including 111 times co-authorship with a total of 3512 citations. This means Malaysia has a strong association with 31 countries. In cluster 1, the least publications are from Cyprus with the association of 5 countries with 5 times co-authorship and 21 total citations; this suggests that the scholars from Cyprus need to take more attention to the networking with different country scholars that have publications related to green supply chain management as this is the most emerging field and need close attention of scholars (Fig.  5 ).

Cluster 2 (green)

Cluster 2 includes 8 countries such as Belgium, Brazil, Columbia, Denmark, India, Netherlands, Poland, and Sweden. It has been found that India has the highest number of 306 publications, and the highest number of total citations 10,193 with 33 countries that include 111 times co-authorship. Whereas Belgium has the minimum number of publications of 04, with 186 total citations, they have the least affiliated country that has 4 affiliations with only 5 times co-authorship, in this cluster; Sweden also has the minimum number of publications 07, 22 total citations with 7 countries, and only has 10 co-authorship. This suggests that scholars in Belgium and Sweden need to take more interest in maintaining and creating moral and strong relations and associations among scholars belonging to different territories that have the most publications in green supply chain management (refer to Fig.  5 ).

Cluster 3 (light blue)

It includes 7 countries namely, Chile, France, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Tunisia, and the UK. According to the co-authorship networking, the UKhas the strongest relations with 43 countries which include 230 co-authorship, along with the highest 8790 citations. Further, Tunisia, and Chile have the least networking with other scholars belonging from different countries with a total of 5 publications and a total of 143 and 214 citations respectively. They should have created relationships with united kingdom scholars.

Cluster 4 (yellow)

It includes 7 countries, namely, Finland, Jordan, Morocco, Oman, Singapore, Switzerland, and United Arab Emirates. In this cluster, United Arab Emirates has the strongest associations with 22 countries, with 64 co-authorship, and 2899 citations, (Fig.  5 ) depicts that the United Arab Emirates has created good relations with Jordan, Oman Singapore, Switzerland, and Morocco authors. Despite having a good number of Publications on the green supply chain management United Arab Emirates has the lowest rank in degree centrality (Fig.  4 ). Degree centrality is a proxy for the association, it is not always a measure of publications (Fonseca et al. 2016 ). In this cluster, Switzerland and Oman have the least associations with international authors with 7 publications and 440 and 533 citations respectively. They have a minimum number of publications; this suggests that they both need to improve their associations with other International Scholars.

Cluster 5 (purple)

This cluster includes 7 countries mainly, Australia, Bangladesh, Germany, Ghana, Hungry, South Africa, and Srilanka. Australia shows the highest level of association with 75 countries with 90 co-authorship at the International level. Despite having the greatest associations Australia ranks at 9 th Rank (Fig.  4 ) among the topmost countries and academic institutions that are published in green supply chain management with having 2767 citations. In this cluster, Hungry and Srilanka have the least international collaborations with 7 and 10 publications, networking with 10 and 5 countries, and 11 and 6 co-authorship respectively.

Cluster 6 (sea green)

It includes 5 countries, Austria, Canada, Japan, Norway, and the USA. The results revealed that the USA has the greatest number of publications 235, with 38 countries, 230 co-authorship with 20,568 citations, whereas Austria and Norway have the least international collaborations 6 and 8 respectively; this depicts that the USA has more charm towards international collaborations; nearby countries should have collaborated with the US scholars as they are keener towards the green supply chain management field.

Cluster 7 (orange)

Cluster 7 has 5 countries, Macau, Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Taiwan has the highest international collaborations with 150 publications from 17 countries, and 66 co-authorship with 8661 citations. Whereas, Philipines and Macau have the least international collaborations 9 and 10 respectively. They need to involve themselves with nearby international scholars such as Taiwan in this specified field.

Cluster 8 (brown)

It includes 4 countries, China, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Nigeria. The analysis depicts that China has the most International collaborations (Fig.  5 ) with 46 countries worldwide, 375 co-authorship with the highest citations 21,380, and it is the topmost productive country that contributed to the field of green supply chain management widely (Fig.  4 ). However, New Zealand and Nigeria have the least international collaboration 9 and 4 respectively. Thus, the current author believes that scholars of New Zealand and Nigeria must collaborate with their neighboring countries China.

Cluster 9 (light pink)

It includes 2 countries, Iran and Lithuania, where Iran has the most documents 169 with 21 countries and 80 international collaborations (Fig.  5 ). Iran scholars need to create strong relations with their neighboring countries Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates and with European countries too.

Cluster 10 (dark pink) and Cluster 11 (grey)

Cluster 10 includes 2 countries named Portugal and South Korea, where South Korea has 50 publications with 18 countries and 44 co-authorship; this depicts that South Korean scholars need to improve their international associations with Taiwan and with other East Asian countries. In cluster 11, only 1 country includes that is Ireland, Ireland is the newest entrant in this field, and the scholars of Ireland need to create international collaborations with the UK as UK scholars are keener in an international association.

Leading authors

Table ​ Table2 2 shows the 15 most prolific authors in green supply chain management; these authors were associated with nine different countries as follows: India (5 authors), China (3 authors), the USA (1 author), France (1 author), Denmark (1 author), Malaysia (1 author), Iran (I author), Taiwan (1 author), and the UK (1author). The year of first publication ranges from 2003 to 2017, where 10 authors had the role of 1 st author, 4 authors had the role of co-author, and 1 author had the role of the last author. The topmost author Sarkis. J. from the USA had a record of 43 total publications since 2003, with document H-index 30, and had 11,069 total citations affiliated with Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, USA. The second author Zhu, Q. belonged from China, with a total of 27 publications since 2004, 8856 total citations, and is affiliated with the top university of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, with document H-index 23. Govindan, K. the third author belonged from Syddansk Universitet Denmark with 22 publications since 2011, 3854 total citations, and had an H-index of 20. Mathiyazhagan, K, Luthra, S., Mangla, S.K., Barve, A., and Kant, R. all belonged to prestigious universities in India.

The list of the 15 most prolific authors in green supply chian or green finance research areas

This suggests that mostly the green supply chain management has grasped the interest of Indian authors and scholars. Tseng, M.L. ranked at 7 th position belonged from Asia University, Taichung Taiwan with 13 publications since 2010, 953 total citations, and with H-index 11. Hafezalkotob, A. ranked at 13 th position affiliated with Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran, had 11 publications since 2017, with 313 total citations, and document H-index 06. The authors for the most cited articles listed in the table in Table ​ Table1 1 do not necessarily seem in Table ​ Table2 2 except Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., and Khan, S.A.R. The affiliation of authors had established that green supply chain management research was related to the field of engineering, environmental science, energy sciences, social sciences, and business management.

Co-citation analysis

The connections formed between two referencing articles when both authors refer to the same article are called bibliographic coupling. Strong coupling is formed when two documents have a large number of citations. Further, bibliographic coupling indicates the similarity in the subject matter. If the two authors are associated bibliographically, then the commonly cited research reflects in their reference list. Various techniques can be used to review the academic structure of a particular field, such as co-citation and citation analysis, still, these methods lack in identifying the evolving themes, thus bibliographic coupling is best to overcome these lacking by analyzing the current topics within a field (Sahi et al. 2022 ). When the two articles published the same reference more than once this depicts the similarity in their methodology, theory, or empirical papers. The link strength between the two articles has been analyzed by VOSviewer, to quantify the associations between the pair references (Table ​ (Table3 3 ).

The list of the main keywords with their peak year

This study has used bibliographic coupling for citation analysis; different units of analysis can be used such as publications, journals, and authors. The current study has taken documents as a unit of analysis and fractional counting was set as the method in VOSviewer. The larger circles indicate the importance of a publication (Fig.  8 ). Five hundred numerical value was set to a minimum number of citations of documents, where 18 documents meet the minimum threshold. This threshold has been selected to have a deepen analysis and not to complicate the investigation. A total of four clusters were identified. The three main clusters and one minor cluster were created, and suggest the collection of themes. The first cluster was red color and contain 6 articles, all the articles were related to the main theme of the study green supply chain management, (Table ​ (Table4). 4 ). The second cluster was green in color and contains 6 articles, with the main theme of green supply chain management and sustainable supply chain management practices, (Table ​ (Table5). 5 ). The third cluster was blue and contains 5 articles, the majority of the articles were related to drivers, barriers, and implementation of green supply chain management, (Table ​ (Table6). 6 ). The last cluster was yellow, and contains only 1 article, that was related to performance measurement in green supply chain management, (Table ​ (Table7 7 ).

Summary of studies in cluster 1

Summary of studies in cluster 2

Summary of studies in cluster 3

Summary of studies in cluster 4

A screenshot of the bibliographic coupling with network visualization mode

Author keywords

A total of 4867 author keywords were recorded. One thousand sixty-two keywords were matched with the minimum threshold of 2 occurrences in VOSviewer, out of 1062, 477 keywords were connected (Fig.  6a, b ).

a A screenshot of the bibliometric map created based on co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode. The minimum occurrence was set to 2. The following URL can be used to open Fig. 6 in VOSviewer: link: https://bit.ly/3t3nw4i . b A screenshot of the bibliometric map created based on co-occurrence with network visualization mode. The minimum occurrence was set to 2. The following URL can be used to open Fig. 6 in VOSviewer: link: https://bit.ly/3t3nw4i

Terminology and concept

The results showed that “Green Supply Chain Management” was the most recurrent keyword with 536 occurrences and 271 links with other keywords. It has been widely used with theoretical keywords such as green finance, green credit, sustainable performances, carbon emissions, renewable energy, climate finance, trade credit, sustainable finance, green logistics, and many more (Fig.  6a ). Further, it has been observed that “green finance (66 links and 115 occurrences),” “green credit (29 links and 390 occurrences),” “sustainable finance (07 links and 60 occurrences),” and “sustainable supply chain (40 links and 240 occurrences),” “green logistics (23 links and 160 occurrences),” “green supply chain management practices (40 links and 22 occurrences),” “green supply chain (217 links and 443 occurrences),” “trade-credit (8 links and 60 occurrences),” “environmental management (62 links and 49 occurrences),” and “green purchasing (36 links and 22 occurrences)” were used simultaneously with the green supply chain management.

The concept of green supply chain management has been found in the early 1990s, but it gain its popularity after 2000 when the environmental management movement came into force (Seuring and Müller 2008 ; Fahimnia et al. 2015 ; Tseng et al. 2019 ). Green supply chain management (GSCM) is an evolutionary concept that is linked with environmental management principles (Handfield et al. 1997 ). The concept of GSCM is inter-organizational practices of a sustainable supply chain and it includes reverse logistics (Sarkis et al. 2011 ). The concept is broad and hard to describe by a single definition (Ahi and Searcy 2013 ). Further, it has been observed that several more attributes and mechanisms were used in naming green supply chain management. Examples of green supply chain management associated with substrate or mechanisms were green supplier selection (41 occurrences), green supply chain management practices (26 occurrences), green supply chain integration (16 occurrences), green supply chain coordination (6 occurrences), green supply chain network (5 occurrences), green supply chain performance (5 occurrences), green supply chain design (5 occurrences), green supply chain initiatives (5 occurrences), green supply chain enablers (2 occurrences), and green supply chain collaborations (2 occurrences) (Fig.  6a, b ).

Moreover, it is also interesting to see how a particular term has been established. For example, the term green supply chain integration, defined by Wu ( 2013 ), “the firm collaborates with its supply chain partners to manage both intra-organizational and inter-organizational environmental practices”; further, it must be divided into internal and external integration. Internal integration based on barriers increases firms’ environmental skills and fosters employees’ gain of knowledge about environmental initiatives (Wu et al. 2012 ), whereas external integration includes collaboration between customer and supplier to mutually handle firms’ environmental issues (Vachon and Klassen 2008 ). Later, the term green supply chain integration has gained the vast attention of different research scholars in many publications, such as (Geng et al. 2017 ; Zhu et al. 2018 ; de Oliveira et al. 2018 ).

Similarly, many other terms were used to refer to green supply chain management such as operational performance (29 occurrences), green manufacturing (26 occurrences), green finance (115 occurrences), green credit (39 occurrences), green credit policy (22 occurrences), environmental risk management (2 occurrences), green investments (13 occurrences), green logistics (16 occurrences), green training (6 occurrences), green competitive advantage (4 occurrences), green distribution (5 occurrences), and green procurement (15 occurrences) (Fig.  6a, b ).

Topics of interest

The main keyword that appeared more frequently was ‘green finance’ with 66 links and 115 occurrences. The second topmost keyword was ‘Environmental Performance’ with 91 inks and 102 occurrences (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). Both keywords have the strongest link with each other. Green finance is the strongest investment activity that creates environmental advantages to upkeep sustainable growth, this is one of the groundbreaking theories that interconnect the environment with financial businesses (Lv et al. 2021 ).

Green finance is referred to as a financial tool that helps to attain the goal of sustainable, economic, social, and environmental development (Scholtens 2006 ). This green finance term is the same as environmental finance, sustainable finance, low-carbon finance, and all the financial activities and tools that involve in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The term green finance is constantly evolving because the whole world is now giving importance to the environment (Lv et al. 2021 ). This term has gained vast attention at the micro and macro level. Its growth influences all the nationwide economies and financial intermediaries. The implementation of green finance can help in reducing carbon strength (Ren et al. 2020 ). It is one of the hot topics for many scholars of the year 2020 and onwards (Fig.  7a, b ). For the realization of green finance, it is important to set a green credit policy. The ‘green credit policy’ has 24 links with 22 occurrences (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). The green credit policy is one of the best penalties for those polluting companies that create pollution in China (Lv et al. 2021 ). According to Wang et al. ( 2019 ), green credit is one of the implementations of green finance; this also helps in expanding the green credit scale in enterprises. Thus, this results in increasing the technological advances which ultimately help in reducing the carbon emissions that will lead to improving the environmental quality (Li et al., 2018 ). ‘Carbon emission’ has 3 links with 2 occurrences (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). Results revealed that the reduction of carbon emissions is also one of the hottest topics of the year 2020 and onwards (Fig.  7a ).

a The graphical representation of the keywords along with its peak year. b The graphical representation of the topics of interest keywords along with their peak year

Now, firms are investing in sustainable development projects and taking initiatives just to encourage green investments. This helps companies to take part in sustainable operations called sustainable finance (An et al. 2021 ). ‘Sustainable finance’ was also one of the keywords that were used frequently in a substrate to green supply chain management, with 7 links and 60 occurrences (Table ​ (Table3 3 ).

Moreover, green credit financing is way different from bank financing because it does not require any mechanism, it only requires linear profit to reduce carbon emissions. Green credit financing considers one of the indicators of environmental performance which was used as a substrate keyword that has 91 links with 102 occurrences. The firms need to invest in a decarbonized portfolio where all firms need to finance in a way to limit their environmental footprints. One of the examples is BNP Paribas (the French banking group) providing financing to the Danone (a food product company in France), which aligned all their investment with the Paris agreement (to reduce their carbon emissions). If a company fails to meet the emissions requirement of the Paris agreement then BNP Paribas will stop lending money to them. Besides this, BNP Paribas has made strict green financing policies for firms who were engaged in generating electricity; if their carbon power exceeds 491 gCo2/kilowatt in 2017, they must lower it by 325 gCo2/ kilowatt by 2025 to maintain International Energy Agency (IEA) sustainable growth setup (An et al. 2021 ).

However, traditionally, in the context of the supply chain, the trade credit financing term was used to solve all capital constraints of firms (Chen 2015 ; An et al. 2021 ). Results revealed that the term ‘trade credit’ was also used as a substrate of green supply chain management with 8 links and 60 occurrences (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). The term has gained tremendous attention in the year 2019 and onwards (Fig.  7a, b ). Trade-credit financing is referred to as a deferred payment mode where supplier and manufacturer have an agreement, wherein in a particular supply chain a supplier is an investor and the manufacturer act as a buyer (Chen 2015 ). Trade credit allows for a delay in payments (Wang et al. 2018a ). It is considered the second most alternative option after bank financing and is widely used in the USA. Trade credit has a positive impact on sustainable and financial development (An et al. 2021 ).

Further, ‘green Investment’ was also one of the substitute keywords of the green supply chain, which has 15 links and 13 occurrences; the concept has been new and at its peak since 2020 (Fig.  7a , ​ ,7b). 7b ). All over the world, banks and firms have been using green investment as green credit financing to mitigate all financial risk and distress. If a firm prefers green credit financing then the firm has to bear all the financial risk but at the same time firm can enjoy lesser interest rates as compared to trade credit financing. On the other hand, if a firm prefers trade-credit financing, then the supplier will act as a financier and will bear all the financial and default payment risks of the downstream manufacturer. Thus, it is important to see which financing approach is much better for green Investment. It has been observed that significant contributions have been made toward carbon emissions in the operation management field (Reefke and Sundaram 2017 ; Guo et al. 2017 ; An et al. 2021 ). However, few studies have been done on carbon emissions within green credit financing and trade credit financing (An et al. 2021 ). Thus, the current study suggests that there is a need to investigate the differences between trade credit and green credit financing under the carbon emissions concept.

Additionally, one of the keywords ‘green technology’ was also found in keywords analysis with 10 links and 4 occurrences; the term has gained attention since 2020 and onwards (Fig.  7a ). If a firm wants to meet the requirement of low carbon emissions then the firm needs to involve itself in green technology. In this way, a firm can meet its green production requirement. ‘Green productivity’ was also one of the keywords that were used with 4 links and 3 occurrences since 2016 (Fig.  7a ). Investing in green technology is very costly for the manufacturer. Thus, for encouraging the manufacturer, there is a necessity to explore more green technology. This result suggests that there is a need to investigate green technology more in future research.

One of the keywords was found ‘green circular economy’ with 2 links and 2 occurrences since 2020 (Fig.  7a ). The term circular economy is linked with sustainable concepts and may overlap with green supply chain management (Liu et al. 2018 ). Both terms have an objective to enhance environmental performance and economic standards. Green supply chain management helps in improving environmental performance (Sarkis 2012 ). However, the circular economy can be taken as a policy that helps in improving economic growth by mitigating ecological challenges (Geng et al. 2009 ; Liu et al. 2018 ). Studies on green supply chain management and circular economy have been investigated (Zhu and Sarkis 2004 ; Brandenburg et al. 2014 ; Dubey et al. 2016 ; Ghisellini et al. 2016 ); nevertheless, theoretical associations are still needed (Liu et al. 2018 ). Thus, the current study depicts that the field is still required the attention of academicians and scholars.

Another keyword that substrate the green supply chain management was ‘industry 4.0’. Industry 4.0 had 15 links and 9 occurrences, the concept had reached its peak in the year 2020. Industry 4.0, the new industrial uprising has come up with new creative customer values. Through modern technologies, now the firm can meet customer product requirements. Digitalization allows the customers to select better products; thus, this can increase in firm’s value even more. Industry 4.0 has created an intelligent industrial revolution known as ‘smart,’ that involves the life cycle of products, business information technology, and value chain. This should integrate with the supply chain, product planning, product designing, product process, and manufacturing (Roblek et al. 2016 ). Thus, the current study suggests that there is a need to explore more industry 4.0 and green supply chain management with green technologies (Fig.  7a, b ).

Conceptual development and framework

Earlier, the initiatives of sustainability were taken to resolve environmental issues; however, as time passes, now the scholars are adopting the concept of the triple bottom line (environmental, economic, and social) methods towards sustainability. This method consists of a larger number of interrelating factors, that’s why the complications can be predicted (Maditati et al. 2018 ). After the keyword analysis, the results revealed that out of 39 clusters, 5 clusters were the main ones with the highest occurrences, such as cluster 1 (red color with 115 occurrences), cluster 2 (green color with 443 occurrences), cluster 15 (sky green color with 68 occurrences), cluster 17 (light brown color with 150 occurrences), and lastly cluster 26 consists (grey color with 536 occurrences), it can be seen from Fig.  6a and ​ andb. b . The results also clearly depict that construct used to be related to green supply chain management, such as the green supply chain management drivers, green supply chain management practices, and green supply chain management enablers that leads to maintaining the organizational performance which ultimately improves the environmental performance these constructs are still not getting the vast attention of scholars (Maditati et al. 2018 ). The study of Maditati et al. ( 2018 ) lacks the fact of COVID-19. Thus, the current study observed that due to COVID-19 circumstances, the trust factor has been raised due to which companies need to involve themselves in green finance and adopt it as a green supply chain management practice to achieve the sustainability goal. Thus, the current study has modified the conceptual framework of (Maditati et al. 2018 ). The logical development has been discussed in the subsequent para.

The knowledge synthesis has been used to propose a conceptual framework, which is done through the use of quantitative data first, followed by the qualitative analysis (Seuring and Gold 2012 ). Firstly, out of 2385 articles, the important papers were selected based on the citations, (the minimum citations must be 500) that were taken for qualitative (content analysis). A total of 18 papers meet the criteria (Fig.  8 ). The papers were scrutinized based on three factors, (1) drivers of green supply chain management, (2) green supply chain management practices, (3) the influence of COVID-19 on green supply chain management practices, and lastly (4) sustainable firm performance and environmental performance.

Green supply chain management drivers

There are many drivers of green supply chain management proposed by different scholars (Wu et al. 2012 ). One of the studies was conducted in Taiwan on the drivers of green supply chain management; the study concluded that green supply chain management drivers must include suppliers’ environmental collaboration, fulfillment of customer needs, and expedition to improve organizational performances (Wu et al. 2011 ; Ososanmi and Ojo 2022 ). However, Diabat and Govindan ( 2011 ) were taken government regulations as the critical driver of green supply chain management, whereas in Germany, it was found that suppliers’ collaboration and environmental performance are considered the green purchasing determinants (Large and Gimenez Thomsen 2011 ). Additionally, Wang et al. ( 2018b ) grouped the drivers of green supply chain management into internal or external green activities that lead to the environmental enactment. On the other hand, in Dubai, the drivers of green supply chain management were also identified between internal and external practices (Ben Brik et al. 2013 ). Thus, based on the different scholar’s identification and pieces of evidence, this confirms that the drivers of green supply chain management revolve around internal and external (Zeng et al. 2011 ; Longoni et al. 2018 ). After a thorough review of articles, the internal and external drivers of green supply chain management are segregated into three dimensions, (a) responsibility, (b) suppliers’ requirements, and (c) demand requirements. Where dimension (a) responsibility consists of government regulations; it refers to the rules and regulations imposed by governments by using green practices (Rehman Khan and Yu 2021 ), and environmental awareness; refers to the awareness of firms regarding the reduction of carbon emissions, dimension (b) consists of strategies against competitors’; it refers to the strategies that foster the organization success and enhances its processes, and establishing the company’s green image; it refers to the need of an organization to own a brand image that cannot be overlooked and dimension (c) includes external pressures of stakeholders; it refers to the stakeholder’s requirements and internal motivators; it refers to the firm’s inter-organizational demand (Maditati et al. 2018 ) (Fig.  9a ).

a Grouping of green supply chain management drivers. b Conceptual framework of the study

Green supply chain management practices

The scholars and practitioners introduced the concept of green supply chain management to resolve the issues of environmental performance; it is coined in the 1990s but gained popularity in 2000; after 2010, the current authors observed a tremendous shift from the year 2010 onwards (Fig.  2 ). Green supply chain management now becomes a need for many organizations to improve the relations between green product suppliers and customers and this is only possible if an organization tries to reduce the activities that are harmful to the environment and the society (Khan et al. 2022 ). Hervani et al. ( 2005 ) explain the term green supply chain management related to green procurement, green manufacturing, green distribution, and lastly, revere logistics. When the organizations take decisions based on green supply chain management, they must consider all stages of a product from material to logistics, and the end-users (Khan et al. 2022 ). Similarly, Srivastava ( 2007 ) explains green supply chain management as the group of thinking related to the environment and supply chain management, which includes product design, fetching materials, the process of manufacturing, and distribution of products to the final users.

In the event of industrial development, small and medium enterprises are now realizing that it is necessary to maintain sustainable development goals such as sustainable employment, economic growth, sustainable innovation, and sustainable industrialization. According to the World Bank, small and medium enterprises contributed 90% to the global business, 40% to the national income, and 50% to the global employment; hence, the development of the new emerging technologies can be an asset to fulfill the sustainable development goals in the small and medium enterprise technological revolution. Firms around the world are now applying emerging technologies to shrink environmental issues (Awan 2021 ; Khan et al. 2021 ).

Pakistan and China are actively involved to protect their economic and environmental performances. The CPEC (China Pakistan Economic Corridor) indulged in many projects such as collaborative industrial zones, and infrastructure development, that lead the firms to involve in new emerging technologies (Cheng et al. 2021 ; An et al. 2021 ; Khan et al. 2021 ). Industry 4.0 is gaining importance due to the newly adopted transformations in the industrial zones. Industry 4.0 helps in sustainability practices such as green remanufacturing, recycling, reuse, and green procurement (Mani et al. 2020 ; Cheng et al. 2021 ; Khan et al. 2021 ). The transformational change in the Industry 4.0 promotes green practices such as data analytics, blockchain technologies, and artificial intelligence (Dalenogare et al. 2018 ; Khan et al. 2021 ).

The organization’s efficiency and productivity can be resolute by the logistic performances of the firm. The firm’s logistics display the overall country’s supply chain quality and performance (Rashidi and Cullinane 2019 ; Khan et al. 2019 ; Suki et al. 2021 ). For any country’s economic development, the manufacturing industry plays a pivotal role; this creates pressure on academicians and managers to discover such practices that give fosters firms economic development. The implementation of green supply chain management practices varies from country to country. This purely depends on the country’s culture and internal pressures; the countries are in the developing stage, and their manufacturing industry is still implementing the green supply chain management practices, that’s why their initiatives regarding environmental performance will differ (Khan et al. 2021 ). According to Khan et al. ( 2021 ), more research must be done on developing countries to examine the relationship between green supply chain management practices and organizational performances. A positive association was found between green supply chain management practices (like recycling, supplier selection, and green packaging,) with financial and environmental performances (Abu Seman et al. 2019 ; Khan et al. 2021 ). For enhancing a firm’s performance firms must adopt green practices (such as green processes, green design, and green technology). Many empirical studies showed that firms having concerned about their environment helps in improving their firm performance and fostering sustainable developments (Svensson et al. 2016 ; Fahim and Mahadi 2022 ). A negative association was also found between green supply chain management practices and economic performance; therefore, there is a need to further investigate the green supply chain management practices to encourage firms to achieve firm sustainability (Khan et al. 2021 ). Sustainable firm performance helps businesses in creating the values and obtaining the shareholder objectives, by executing opportunities and managing the threats that originate from social, economic, and environmental development (Fahim and Mahadi 2022 ).

Moreover, after the industrial revolution, due to the inventions of new technologies, and the reduction in natural resources and energy, many negative impacts have been grown on the environment (Ture and Ganesh 2018 ; Whitburn et al. 2020 ; Cai and Guo 2021 ). Subsequently, many environmental issues have arisen, which make sure to remain focused on societal and human development without hurting the ecosystem (Whitburn et al. 2020 ; Raza et al. 2021 ). Some issues related to the environment pose a small threat while other issues significantly affect the whole environment, such as changes in weather, heat waves, depletion of the ozone layer, deforestation, and exploitation of natural resources. This greatly affected biodiversity. The gradual effect on the environment has given the reason for the whole world to pay attention to the relationship between humans and the environment, which in turn arisen the focus of environmental protection. Now, the trend has changed human wants to live with nature and focus on environmental sustainability (Yong et al. 2019 ; Cabral and Dhar 2020 ). Policymakers and professionals are nowadays taking interest in environmental sustainability; however, organizations understand the gravity of environmental issues and try to indulge themselves in “green practices” which then become the main objective of every organization. Practitioners are focusing on green practices, and green finance is one of the green practices Cai and Guo ( 2021 ) that are part of the main green supply chain management. There is a vast growth has been seen in green finance over the last few years (Fig.  7a, b ).

Furthermore, it has been found that the atmosphere may get affected by pollution. The profits of industries are at risk due to this problem. Despite being treated the pollution, Porter and Linde ( 1995 ) stated that the creation of pollution is the inefficiency of industries. Hence, the green investment in water, biodiversity protection, waste treatment, resources, and climate change alleviation helps in enhancing industrial production. Many case studies show green investments help in the reduction of carbon emissions and protect the environment (Liu et al. 2018 ; Chițimiea et al. 2021 ). The researchers of Columbia University have examined the link between green investments and renewable energy and established that they were using different levels of sustainable development goals (Zhang et al. 2022 ). Investments in green equity, carbon market tools, and green bonds help in promoting “green” and will lead to enhancing the sustainable development goals. Thus, for the enhancement of green growth, the industries must adopt green financing by making investments in ecology, climate change, and carbon reduction (Zhang et al. 2022 ). Green finance and environmental invention signify the main drivers of sustainable development which is linked with sustainable firm performances. The green finance performance declines when firms increased their financial constraints. Here, the green credit policy helps in mitigating those constraints and protecting the quality of the environment through determining investments and corporate financing. Green credit is the most crucial financial element that leads to sustainable firm performance, economic growth, environmental protection, and sustainable development (Song et al. 2021 ). Thus, green credit is a basic tool for the enhancement of green finance. Moreover, the current state of COVID-19 creates a situation where manufacturers also facing the biggest issues in green finance. Currently, the COVID-19 crisis has destroyed the world economy brutally; it gives an immense impact on the supply chain. It has been discussed in detail in the succeeding paragraph.

Due to the pandemic, all the economies of the world were stunned, and affected the manufacturing and service sectors viciously. This pandemic increases various issues related to socio-economic crises and public health(Yu et al. 2021b ). The global economy was negatively affected by the coronavirus eruption. The networks of the supply chain were already suffering from geographical dispersion and had now become interdependent and complex. One of the surveys in the USA at the institute of supply chain management investigated and found that 75% of companies reported disruption in their supply chain. Due to this disruption, there was massive unavailability of product materials, leading to shortages in final products. This causes the situation of import and export of the materials and products to worsen with the lack of freight options. This created a “manufacturing desert” in the whole world, and the export from China declined significantly as China dominates the global supply chain (Ibn-Mohammed et al. 2021 ). Many organizations faced enormous issues, companies suffered multiple challenges such as a decline in demand, disturbances in the supply chain, cancellation in exports, raw material shortfall, and transportation network disbands (Yu et al. 2021b ). The tremendous decline in industrial operations, supply, and demand for energy and transportation activities has given the long-term move in industrial and consumer behavior. Such a move could reorient monetary and fiscal policies towards the SDGs (sustainable development goals). Thus, the government will is one of the successful features in enabling green finance in the country in this situation, which helps in financial policies, economic policies, manufacturing of products, and services that further transform the economy, system, and institutions to attain sustainable development. The importance of green finance has been seen in the last few years but COVID-19 has created a situation where green finance now become more prominent as a main theme; it comes up with the new economic strategies to recover the enormous losses that has been incurred due to this COVID-19 pandemic.

Moreover, in December 2019, the COVID-19 has brought severe challenges to the bond market and global stock market as well (Wagner 2020 ). Due to the COVID-19, the green bonds are tattered through the capital market and the environment. As green bonds are very famous in the financial market in China, it exceeds RMB 1.1 trillion from 2016 to 2019; it makes China the second-largest green bond market in the world. Thus, the larger amount spent on environmental protection and reducing pollution, which depicts the major importance of the green bond for the development of China’s ecological building. Thus, how the green product market reacts to this pandemic is equally important to study (Wagner 2020 ; Li et al. 2021 ).

Additionally, for supporting sustainable firm performances and reducing financial grief, many banks all over the world have introduced the concept of green credit financing. It is a financial service that helps firm in investing in sustainable development projects which inspire firms to invest more in green investments. Green credit financing is beneficial for reducing carbon emissions; the main objective of green credit is to maintain the sustainable operation of a firm by adopting abundant loan standards. However, the manufacturing industry plays the biggest role in economic growth and creates wealth and employment (Ong et al. 2019 ). Globally manufacturing firms added the value of 14.17 trillion US dollars, further; however, presently manufacturing sector is one of the greatest sectors in the world which is negatively disturbing the whole environment (Piyathanavong et al. 2019 ).

More serious environmental issues have been faced and have gained much attention from public sectors and governments (Joo and Suh 2017 ; Chu et al. 2017 ). For the reduction of carbon emissions, different policies have been regulated by the governments for creating awareness of sustainability and to reduce the environmental effects of operational activities of firms. The UK for example already launched a (CRC) Carbon Reduction Commitment, a mandatory system that reduced carbon emissions by 1.2 million tons a year in 2020 (Bai et al. 2019 ). China has also implemented many systems to cut carbon emissions, in China, the Ministry of Environmental Protection has issued a serious warning of closure to the companies that did not reduce carbon after a specific period (Banciu and Mirchandani 2013 ). Most companies in China are now upgrading themselves and trying to invest more and more in green tools, which ultimately aggravates their capital limitations (Cao and Yu 2018 ). At the same time, firms in many developing countries are struggling to access credit from banks that have greater default risk and low credit ratings (Chen et al. 2021 ). Therefore, such insufficient financial reserves may depress firms to successfully face all environmental and sustainable issues (Walker and Preuss 2008 ).

Thus, green products can work as a powerful tool to foster the sustainable performance of a business and to make environmental friendly strategies that help in the allocation of credit resources; thus, it is imperative that green financing should be established as a profitable firm proposition that gives potential to large firms (Zubair Mumtaz and Alexander Smith 2019 ; Majeed et al. 2020 ). Therefore, through the above discussion, the current study has been able to develop a conceptual framework of the study, (Fig.  9b ).

Distribution of green supply chain management publications based on major applications

Based on the analysis of the number of articles and keywords, positive correlations were found between the central theme and the sub-themes. The search phrase (“green finance”) had 324 articles in Scopus and had 115 occurrences in VOSviewer. This was the most famous application of green supply chain management. The second most famous application was (‘Environmental performance”) with 102 occurrences in VOSviewer along with 17,568 articles in Scopus. Further, (‘trade-credit”) was also found one of the major applications as this existed with 60 occurrences and had 1743 articles in Scopus. (“Sustainable finance”) was also one of the popular terms concerning green supply chain management with 60 occurrences and had 253 total articles in Scopus. One of the terms (“Climate Finance”) had 447 publications in Scopus; however, it had only 06 occurrences means, it appears 6 times with other keywords. (“Reverse Logistics”) was also the famous keyword that was used widely in green supply chain management, it had a vast collection of articles (3347) in Scopus and had 57 links with other keywords. Thus, this suggests that now scholars are realizing that green supply chain management is not the only goal to achieve sustainable renewable energies. Before 2020, there was much reliance on green supply chain management but now the term has many substitutes, it has been observed that now green finance or climate finance had taken over the previous terms related to green supply chain management.

Furthermore, research interest in particular areas can also be examined by the link strength of keywords. For example, ‘green credit’ has 39 links (connected to 39 other keywords), namely, climate change, energy efficiency, environmental regulations, carbon emissions, economic growth, sustainable finance, green economy, green innovation, green bonds, circular economy, environmental quality, green investments, sustainable development goals, and energy policy. It is recommended that research interest in green finance- sustainable development (9 link strength) was much stronger as compared to renewable energy (7 link strength) and green bonds (6 link strength). It is also found that the publications related to green finance, green credit, climate finance, environmental performances, sustainable finance, reverse logistics, and renewable energies mostly came from China.

Limitations of the study

We restrict the search by using “green finance” or “green supply chain management” “green credit” or “green supply chain finance” in articles and abstracts; this search outcome might not shelter all the articles related to green supply chain management that were available in Scopus. Because some scholars do not use green supply chain management, instead they used different keywords (such as sustainable supply chain, and GSCM practices). Further, this study was based on the Scopus database; scholars may use different databases also such as the Web of Science (WoS), or they may use both databases to compare results. The current study deals with only sustainability and renewable energies; future scholars may use the concept to see its impact on economic development and financial development.

This study addresses the idiosyncrasies in the literature by presenting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis that will help researchers to broaden their knowledge about green finance and green supply chain management phenomenon. The current study has given a comprehensive overview of green supply chain management research trends based on 2385 articles that were retrieved from the Scopus database. Rapid growth has been seen in publications for the last 10 years, and it is predicted that it will further rise as the world now become more concerned for its environment. We have revealed countries and academic institutions and found that China, India, Iran, and Taiwan have a vast collection of articles in the field of green supply chain management and have very strong international collaborations. These countries can be a groundbreaking opportunity for the UK and Australia to widen their research associations. We have discussed many areas that are recently been well explored such as environmental performances, reverse logistics, and trade credit; however, a few new areas are discovered like green innovation, green finance, CSR, green information technology, green productivity, corporate environmental responsibility, carbon emissions, cold chain logistics, green credit guidelines, green investments, green credit, and green credit policy that still needs scholars attention and can be the hot topics for future scholars.

Significance and implications of findings

This study fills a literature gap by presenting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis that will help researchers to broaden their knowledge about the link between green finance and green supply chain management research. This study will help researchers by providing a comprehensive overview of the origin, evolution, and status of green finance research concerning green supply chain management. As this study provides a synthesized summary of the existing definitions, perspectives, and research trends within this field and discusses its distribution between subject areas, journals, countries, institutions, and authors, it shows that the field is constantly developing and allows researchers to find the potential future research opportunities.

Managers can benefit from the findings of this study as they now have comprehensive information about the significant actors in the field who are constantly developing the field. This would help them identify references to gain additional insights into the phenomenon. This may help them determine various current research trends such as green finance practices adopted by the sustainable firm’s founders and how these practices guarantee the improved environmental performance of organizations. Further, they can enhance the understanding of how the process of green finance in GSCM is implemented in different economic sectors and the potential of the phenomenon for social and economic development and climate resilience. In addition, this study would help policymakers by identifying the leading countries involved in green finance, understanding their systems, and taking guidance for their research and development programs.

Policy recommendations

We suggest various recommendations for policymakers. First, policymakers should develop clear standardized policies on green finance for various sectors across the globe as organizations have continued to relegate the environmental standards. For that, policymakers should set meaningful targets for environmental performance, and construct a useful index to monitor the level of green performance. Based on performance results obtained from those indicators, the experts should enforce the penalties for large organizations violating green performance standards and restructure the green policies and funding accordingly. This will sort out any irregularities in the enforcement of local and international laws. Second, literature shows that green finance level is low in developing countries as compared to developed countries. The findings indicate that green finance can promote green economic growth; thus, government should allocate further funding to the needed local sectors and industries with high pollution index to promote technology innovation and green economic success. However, green funding should be governed strictly based on the expected outcome. To make this more effective, efforts should be made to strengthen the communication and trust between regulatory authorities and organizations. Third, regulatory authorities should provide incentive schemes to promote the private sector’s green finance. This can be done by providing tax credits and refunding a part of the tax increase to increase the rate of return of these green projects.

Potential avenues for future research

Based on the analysis of the study, we suggest potential directions for future research. First, the current study deals with only sustainability and climate finance, future scholars may use the concept to see its impact on economic development and financial development (Chien et al. 2021 ). For example, they may determine how to use green finance to better improve the green financial system, reduce investment risks, and stimulate a green economy and sustainable development. In addition, determining cointegration among variables of green finance, green innovation, and green economic growth would be of significance. Second, the findings show that studies on green supply chain management and circular economy have been investigated (Zhu and Sarkis 2004 ; Brandenburg et al. 2014 ; Dubey et al. 2016 ; Ghisellini et al. 2016 ; Khan et al. 2021 ). Nevertheless, more theoretical associations are needed to provide better explanations and enhance the understanding of the phenomenon (Liu et al. 2018 ). For example, focusing on how to implement green finance projects to obtain circular economy objectives in the international framework would be useful for global sustainable development. Third, the result suggests that there is a need to investigate green technology concerning green finance as the literature lacks enough evidence about the phenomenon. For example, researchers can determine the associations between green finance and new technological concepts such as blockchain and artificial intelligence. This will be helpful to evaluate green innovation techniques and major roadblocks in the organizations for improving environmental performance (Madaleno et al. 2022 ). Fourth, as the past literature suggest that it is important to see which financing approach is much better for green investment. Yet, few studies have been done on carbon emissions within green credit financing and trade credit financing (An et al. 2021 ). Thus, the current study suggests that there is a need to investigate the differences between trade credit and green credit financing under the carbon emissions concept.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

Faryal Fahim and Batiah Mahadi appreciate Jauhara Md Khudzari for her kind support in organizing a workshop on Bibliometric Analysis. Through her divine bibliometric skills and lectures, we were able to produce this research paper.

Author contribution

Faryal Fahim drafted and wrote the manuscript (original draft) whereas Batiah Mahadi contributed to editing, supervision, review, and conceptualization.

Data availability

Declarations.

Not applicable.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Faryal Fahim, Email: ym.mtu.etaudarg@02mihaf .

Batiah Mahadi, Email: [email protected] .

• Abu Seman NA, Govindan K, Mardani A, et al. The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. J Clean Prod. 2019; 229 :115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ahi P, Searcy C. A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 2013; 52 :329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• An S, Li B, Song D, Chen X. Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. Eur J Oper Res. 2021; 292 :125–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.025. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Awan U, et al. Steering for sustainable development goals: a typology of sustainable innovation. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, et al., editors. Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 1026–1036. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bag S, Telukdarie A, Pretorius JHC, Gupta S (2018) Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: Framework and future research directions. Benchmark Int J 28(5):1410–1450. 10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0056
• Bai Q, Gong Y (Yale), Jin M, Xu X. Effects of carbon emission reduction on supply chain coordination with vendor-managed deteriorating product inventory. Int J Prod Econ. 2019; 208 :83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Banciu M, Mirchandani P. Technical Note—new results concerning probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper Res. 2013; 61 :925–931. doi: 10.1287/opre.2013.1198. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ben Brik A, Mellahi K, Rettab B. Drivers of green supply chain in emerging economies. Thunderbird Int’l Bus Rev. 2013; 55 :123–136. doi: 10.1002/tie.21531. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bolderdijk JW, Steg L, Geller ES, et al. Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Clim Change. 2013; 3 :413–416. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1767. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Brandenburg M, Govindan K, Sarkis J, Seuring S. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: developments and directions. Eur J Oper Res. 2014; 233 :299–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Burke M, Hsiang SM, Miguel E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature. 2015; 527 :235–239. doi: 10.1038/nature15725. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3000–3011. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
• Cabral C, Dhar RL. Green competencies: insights and recommendations from a systematic literature review. Benchmark: Int J. 2020; 28 :66–105. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0489. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cai R, Guo J. Finance for the environment: a scientometrics analysis of green finance. Mathematics. 2021; 9 :1537. doi: 10.3390/math9131537. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cao E, Yu M. Trade credit financing and coordination for an emission-dependent supply chain. Comput Ind Eng. 2018; 119 :50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.024. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan APC, Darko A, Olanipekun AO, Ameyaw EE. Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. J Clean Prod. 2018; 172 :1067–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.235. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen X. A model of trade credit in a capital-constrained distribution channel. Int J Prod Econ. 2015; 159 :347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen C, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Li W. The impact of green credit on economic growth—the mediating effect of environment on labor supply. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16 :e0257612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257612. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cheng Y, Awan U, Ahmad S, Tan Z. How do technological innovation and fiscal decentralization affect the environment? A story of the fourth industrial revolution and sustainable growth. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2021; 162 :120398. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120398. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chien F, Ngo Q-T, Hsu C-C, et al. Assessing the mechanism of barriers towards green finance and public spending in small and medium enterprises from developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28 :60495–60510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14907-1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chitimiea A, Minciu M, Manta A-M, et al. The drivers of green investment: a bibliometric and systematic review. Sustainability. 2021; 13 :3507. doi: 10.3390/su13063507. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chiou T-Y, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 47(6):822–836. 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
• Chu C-C, Tsai S-B, Chen Y, et al. An empirical study on the relationship between investor protection, government behavior, and financial development. Sustainability. 2017; 9 :2199. doi: 10.3390/su9122199. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dalenogare LS, Benitez GB, Ayala NF, Frank AG. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int J Prod Econ. 2018; 204 :383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R (2008) Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Bus Strategy Environ 17(1):30–45. 10.1002/bse.557
• de Oliveira UR, Espindola LS, da Silva IR, et al. A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: research implications and future perspectives. J Clean Prod. 2018; 187 :537–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.083. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Diabat A, Govindan K. An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2011; 55 :659–667. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, et al. Towards a theory of sustainable consumption and production: constructs and measurement. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2016; 106 :78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Elie L, Granier C, Rigot S. The different types of renewable energy finance: a Bibliometric analysis. Energy Economics. 2021; 93 :104997. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fahim F, Mahadi B. Green trade credit and sustainable firm performances during COVID-19: a conceptual review. Vision-the Journal of Business Perspective. 2022 doi: 10.1177/09722629221096050. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H. Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 2015; 162 :101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fletcher R, Dressler WH, Anderson ZR, Büscher B. Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics. J Peasant Stud. 2019; 46 :1068–1095. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fonseca B de PF e, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MV de A, Zicker F (2016) Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Res Policy Sys 14:34. 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Gao S, Meng F, Gu Z, et al. Mapping and clustering analysis on environmental, social and governance field a bibliometric analysis using Scopus. Sustainability. 2021; 13 :7304. doi: 10.3390/su13137304. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Geng Y, Zhang P, Côté RP, Fujita T. Assessment of the National Eco-Industrial Park Standard for promoting industrial symbiosis in China. J Ind Ecol. 2009; 13 :15–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00071.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Geng R, Mansouri SA, Aktas E. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: a meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. Int J Prod Econ. 2017; 183 :245–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod. 2016; 114 :11–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ghisetti C, Mancinelli S, Mazzanti M, Zoli M. Financial barriers and environmental innovations: evidence from EU manufacturing firms. Climate Policy. 2017; 17 :S131–S147. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1242057. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Green KW, Zelbst PJ, Bhadauria VS, Meacham J (2012) Do environmental collaboration and monitoring enhance organizational performance? Ind Manag Data Syst 112(2):186–205. 10.1108/02635571211204254
• Greene DL. What is greener than a VMT tax? The case for an indexed energy user fee to finance us surface transportation. Transp Res Part d: Transp Environ. 2011; 16 :451–458. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guertler P. Can the green deal be fair too? Exploring new possibilities for alleviating fuel poverty. Energy Policy. 2012; 49 :91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.059. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guo F, Liu Q, Liu D, Guo Z. On production and green transportation coordination in a sustainable global supply chain. Sustainability. 2017; 9 :2071. doi: 10.3390/su9112071. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Handfield RB, Walton SV, Seegers LK, Melnyk SA. ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. J Oper Manag. 1997; 15 :293–315. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00004-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmark: Int J. 2005; 12 :330–353. doi: 10.1108/14635770510609015. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ibn-Mohammed T, Mustapha KB, Godsell J, et al. A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021; 164 :105169. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Joo H-Y, Suh H. The effects of government support on corporate performance hedging against international environmental regulation. Sustainability. 2017; 9 :1980. doi: 10.3390/su9111980. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Khan SAR, Jian C, Zhang Y, et al. Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod. 2019; 214 :1011–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Khan SAR, Godil DI, Jabbour CJC, et al. Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: evidence from small and medium enterprises. Ann Oper Res. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-04275-x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Khan MT, Idrees MD, Rauf M, et al. Green supply chain management practices’ impact on operational performance with the mediation of technological innovation. Sustainability. 2022; 14 :3362. doi: 10.3390/su14063362. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Large RO, Gimenez Thomsen C. Drivers of green supply management performance: evidence from Germany. J Purch Supply Manag. 2011; 17 :176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2011.04.006. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li Z, Liao G, Wang Z, Huang Z. Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. J Clean Prod. 2018; 187 :421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li Z-Z, Li RYM, Malik MY, et al. Determinants of carbon emission in China: how good is green investment? Sustain Prod Consum. 2021; 27 :392–401. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu J, Feng Y, Zhu Q, Sarkis J. Green supply chain management and the circular economy: reviewing theory for advancement of both fields. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2018; 48 :794–817. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2017-0049. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Longoni A, Luzzini D, Guerci M. Deploying environmental management across functions: the relationship between green human resource management and green supply chain management. J Bus Ethics. 2018; 151 :1081–1095. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lv C, Bian B, Lee C-C, He Z. Regional gap and the trend of green finance development in China. Energy Economics. 2021; 102 :105476. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105476. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Madaleno M, Dogan E, Taskin D (2022) A step forward on sustainability: The nexus of environmental responsibility, green technology, clean energy and green finance. Energy Econ 109:105945. 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105945
• Maditati DR, Munim ZH, Schramm H-J, Kummer S. A review of green supply chain management: from bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework and future research directions. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018; 139 :150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Majeed MT, Samreen I, Tauqir A, Mazhar M. The asymmetric relationship between financial development and CO2 emissions: the case of Pakistan. SN Appl Sci. 2020; 2 :827. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2627-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mani V, Jabbour CJC, Mani KTN. Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy. Int J Prod Econ. 2020; 227 :107656. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Md Khudzari J, Kurian J, Tartakovsky B, Raghavan GSV. Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database. Biochem Eng J. 2018; 136 :51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ong TS, Magsi HB, Burgess TF. Organisational culture, environmental management control systems, environmental performance of Pakistani manufacturing industry. IJPPM. 2019; 68 :1293–1322. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0187. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ososanmi AO, Ojo LD, Ogundimu OE, Oke AE (2022) Drivers of green supply chain management: A close-up study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(10):14705–14718. 10.1007/s11356-021-16638-9 [ PubMed ]
• Pan S-Y, Du MA, Huang I-T, et al. Strategies on implementation of waste-to-energy (WTE) supply chain for circular economy system: a review. J Clean Prod. 2015; 108 :409–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.124. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Piyathanavong V, Garza-Reyes JA, Kumar V, et al. The adoption of operational environmental sustainability approaches in the Thai manufacturing sector. J Clean Prod. 2019; 220 :507–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.093. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Porter ME, van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect. 1995; 9 :97–118. doi: 10.1257/jep.9.4.97. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rashidi K, Cullinane K. Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using data envelopment analysis. Transp Policy. 2019; 74 :35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raza A, Farrukh M, Iqbal MK, et al. Corporate social responsibility and employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior: the role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2021; 28 :1104–1116. doi: 10.1002/csr.2109. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Reefke H, Sundaram D. Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation. Omega. 2017; 66 :195–211. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.02.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rehman Khan SA, Yu Z. Assessing the eco-environmental performance: an PLS-SEM approach with practice-based view. Int J Log Res Appl. 2021; 24 :303–321. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2020.1754773. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ren X, Shao Q, Zhong R. Nexus between green finance, non-fossil energy use, and carbon intensity: empirical evidence from China based on a vector error correction model. J Clean Prod. 2020; 277 :122844. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122844. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Roblek V, Meško M, Krapež A. A complex view of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open. 2016; 6 :2158244016653987. doi: 10.1177/2158244016653987. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sahi AM, Khalid H, Abbas AF, et al. The research trend of security and privacy in digital payment. Informatics. 2022; 9 :32. doi: 10.3390/informatics9020032. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarkis J. A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 2003; 11 :397–409. doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarkis J. A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag: Int J. 2012; 17 :202–216. doi: 10.1108/13598541211212924. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ. 2011; 130 :1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Scarpellini S, Marín-Vinuesa LM, Portillo-Tarragona P, Moneva JM. Defining and measuring different dimensions of financial resources for business eco-innovation and the influence of the firms’ capabilities. J Clean Prod. 2018; 204 :258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.320. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Scholtens B. Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2006; 68 :19–33. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9037-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Seuring S, Gold S. Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supp Chain Mnagmnt. 2012; 17 :544–555. doi: 10.1108/13598541211258609. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 2008; 16 :1699–1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Song M, Xie Q, Shen Z. Impact of green credit on high-efficiency utilization of energy in China considering environmental constraints. Energy Policy. 2021; 153 :112267. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112267. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Srivastava SK. Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev. 2007; 9 :53–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stern N. The Structure of economic modeling of the potential impacts of climate change: grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. Journal of Economic Literature. 2013; 51 :838–859. doi: 10.1257/jel.51.3.838. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suki NM, Suki NM, Sharif A, Afshan S. The role of logistics performance for sustainable development in top Asian countries: evidence from advance panel estimations. Sustain Dev. 2021; 29 :595–606. doi: 10.1002/sd.2160. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sun D, Zeng S, Lin H, et al. Can transportation infrastructure pave a green way? A city-level examination in China. J Clean Prod. 2019; 226 :669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.124. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Svensson G, Høgevold N, Ferro C, et al. A triple bottom line dominant logic for business sustainability: framework and empirical findings. J Bus Bus Mark. 2016; 23 :153–188. doi: 10.1080/1051712X.2016.1169119. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tseng M-L, Islam MS, Karia N, et al. A literature review on green supply chain management: trends and future challenges. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019; 141 :145–162. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ture RS, Ganesh MP. Pro-environmental behaviours at workplace: an empirical study in Indian manufacturing organizations. Benchmark: Int J. 2018; 25 :3743–3766. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-07-2017-0193. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vachon S, Klassen RD (2006) Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(7):795–821. 10.1108/01443570610672248
• Vachon S, Klassen RD. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 2008; 111 :299–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wagner AF. What the stock market tells us about the post-COVID-19 world. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4 :440–440. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0869-y. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Walker H, Preuss L. Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives. J Clean Prod. 2008; 16 :1600–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang K, Zhao R, Peng J. Trade credit contracting under asymmetric credit default risk: screening, checking or insurance. Eur J Oper Res. 2018; 266 :554–568. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhang S, Zhao X. Effects of customer and cost drivers on green supply chain management practices and environmental performance. J Clean Prod. 2018; 189 :673–682. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.071. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang F, Yang S, Reisner A, Liu N. Does green credit policy work in China? The Correlation between Green credit and corporate environmental information disclosure quality. Sustainability. 2019; 11 :733. doi: 10.3390/su11030733. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang M, Li X, Wang S. Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: a data-driven scientometric analysis. Energy Policy. 2021; 154 :112295. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112295. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Whitburn J, Linklater W, Abrahamse W. Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conserv Biol. 2020; 34 :180–193. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13381. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Winkler H, Dubash NK. Who determines transformational change in development and climate finance? Climate Policy. 2016; 16 :783–791. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1033674. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wu G. The influence of green supply chain integration and environmental uncertainty on green innovation in Taiwan’s IT industry. Supply Chain Manag: Int J. 2013; 18 :539–552. doi: 10.1108/SCM-06-2012-0201. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wu K-J, Tseng M-L, Vy T. Evaluation the drivers of green supply chain management practices in uncertainty. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011; 25 :384–397. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.049. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wu G-C, Ding J-H, Chen P-S. The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. Int J Prod Econ. 2012; 135 :618–636. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.023. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yang H, Shao E, Gong Y, Guan X. Decision-making for green supply chain considering fairness concern based on trade credit. IEEE Access. 2021; 9 :67684–67695. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073472. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yong JY, Yusliza M-Y, Fawehinmi OO. Green human resource management: a systematic literature review from 2007 to 2019. Benchmark: Int J. 2019; 27 :2005–2027. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0438. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu X, Mao Y, Huang D, et al. Mapping global research on green finance from 1989 to 2020: a bibliometric study. Adv Civ Eng. 2021; 2021 :1–13. doi: 10.1155/2021/9934004. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu Z, Razzaq A, Rehman A, et al. Disruption in global supply chain and socio-economic shocks: a lesson from COVID-19 for sustainable production and consumption. Oper Manag Res. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00179-y. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zeng SX, Meng XH, Zeng RC, et al. How environmental management driving forces affect environmental and economic performance of SMEs: a study in the Northern China district. J Clean Prod. 2011; 19 :1426–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang D, Zhang Z, Managi S. A bibliometric analysis on green finance: current status, development, and future directions. Financ Res Lett. 2019; 29 :425–430. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang Y, Li X, Xing C. How does China’s green credit policy affect the green innovation of high polluting enterprises? The perspective of radical and incremental innovations. J Clean Prod. 2022; 336 :130387. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130387. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhou X, Li T, Ma X. A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese green supply chain research hotspots and frontiers. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28 :6302–6323. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11947-x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag. 2004; 22 :265–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2006) An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. J Clean Prod 14(5):472–486. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2007) The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. Int J Prod Res 45:4333–4355. 10.1080/00207540701440345
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(5):449–468. 10.1108/01443570510593148
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2007) Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J Clean Prod 15(11):1041–1052. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.021
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2008) Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):261–273. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2013) Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. J Purch Supply Manag 19(2):106–117. 10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001
• Zhu Q, Krikke H, Caniëls MCJ. Supply chain integration: value creation through managing inter-organizational learning. IJOPM. 2018; 38 :211–229. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0372. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zubair Mumtaz DM, Alexander Smith DZ (2019) Green finance for sustainable development in Pakistan. iprij 1–34. 10.31945/iprij.190201

Advertisement

Research on green supply chain: a bibliometric analysis

• Original Paper
• Published: 15 October 2018
• Volume 21 , pages 3–22, ( 2019 )

Cite this article

• Keivan Amirbagheri   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7708-583X 1 ,
• Ana Núñez-Carballosa 1 ,
• Laura Guitart-Tarrés 1 &
• José M. Merigó 2 , 3  

1667 Accesses

39 Citations

Explore all metrics

Recently, the emergent concept of green supply chain has received increasing attention. Although popular among scholars, many literature reviews have only examined GSC from a general point of view or focused on a specific issue related to GSC. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence and productivity of research on GSC from 1995 to 2017 by reporting trends among authors, countries and institutions based on a bibliometric approach. To this end, the study analyzes around 1900 papers on GSC. This study uses the Web of Science Core Collection database to analyze the bibliometric data and the visualization of similarities viewer method to graphically map those data. The graphical analysis uses bibliographic coupling, co-citation, co-authorship and co-occurrence of keywords.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A bibliometric review of green innovation research: identifying knowledge domain and network

Management Perspective of “Green Strategies” Research—Scientometric Analysis

Green Supply Chain Management: A Meta-analysis of Recent Reviews

Ahi P, Searcy C (2013) A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 52:329–341

Article   Google Scholar  

Albort-Morant G, Henseler J, Leal-Millán A, Cepeda-Carrión G (2017) Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability 9:1011

Alfalla-Luque R, Medina-Lopez C (2009) Supply chain management: unheard of in the 1970s, core to today’s company. Bus Hist 51:202–221

Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2009) h-Index: a review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. J Informetr 3:273–289

Andrade A, Dominski FH, Coimbra DR (2017) Scientific production on indoor air quality of environments used for physical exercise and sports practice: bibliometric analysis. J Environ Manage 196:188–200

Beske-Janssen P, Johnson MP, Schaltegger S (2015) 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management–what has been achieved? Supply Chain Manag 20:664–680

Blanco-Mesa F, Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2017) Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32:2033–2050

Broadus R (1987) Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics 12:373–379

Cancino C, Merigó JM, Coronado F, Dessouky Y, Dessouky M (2017) Forty years of computers and industrial engineering: a bibliometric analysis. Comput Ind Eng 113:614–629

Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distr Log 38:60–387

Google Scholar  

Chang PL, Hsieh PN (2008) Bibliometric overview of operations research/management science research in Asia. Asia Pac J Oper Res 25:217–241

Charvet FF, Cooper MC, Gardner JT (2008) The intellectual structure of the supply chain management: a bibliometric approach. J Bus Logist 29:47–53

Chen L, Zhao X, Tang O, Price L, Zhang S, Zhu W (2017) Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: a literature review and future research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 193:73–87

de Oliveira UR, Espindola LS, da Silva IR, da Silva IN, Rocha HM (2018) A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: research implications and future perspectives. J Clean Prod 187:537–561

Dragos CM, Dragos SL (2013) Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology. Sci Total Environ 449:184–188

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Eltayeb TK, Zailani S, Ramayah T (2011) Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: investigating the outcomes. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:495–506

Fahimnia B, Sarkis J, Davarzani H (2015) Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ 162:101–114

Feng Y, Zhu Q, Lai KH (2017) Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. J Clean Prod 158:296–307

Fu HZ, Wang MH, Ho YS (2013) Mapping of drinking water research: a bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011. Sci Total Environ 443:757–765

Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J, Murugesan P (2015) Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod 98:66–83

Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C (2012) A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int J Prod Econ 140:69–82

Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572

Hood W, Wilson C (2001) The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics 52:291–314

Hsieh PN, Chang PL (2009) An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. Int J Prod Econ 120:540–551

Hu J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gan F, Ho YS (2010) A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on lead in drinking water field from 1991 to 2007. Sci Total Environ 408:1738–1744

Ioana-Toroimac G (2018) Outcomes of the hydromorphology integration in the water framework directive: a review based on science mapping. J Environ Manage 206:1135–1144

Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101:99–108

Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 14:10–25

Khan MA, Ho YS (2012) Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: merits and demerits of citation analysis. Sci Total Environ 431:122–127

Kumar S, Teichman S, Timpernagel T (2012) A green supply chain is a requirement for profitability. Int J Prod Res 50:1278–1296

Laengle S, Merigó JM, Miranda J, Słowiński R, Bomze I, Borgonovo E, Dyson RG, Oliveira JF, Teunter R (2017) Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: a bibliometric overview. Eur J Oper Res 262:803–816

Laengle S, Modak NM, Merigo JM, Zurita G (2018) Twenty-five years of group decision and negotiation: a bibliometric overview. Group Decis Negot 27:505–542

Lee SM, Sung Rha J, Choi D, Noh Y (2013) Pressures affecting green supply chain performance. Manage Decis 51:1753–1768

Martínez-López FJ, Merigó JM, Valenzuela-Fernández L, Nicolás C (2018) Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. Eur J Mark 52:439–468

Merigó JM, Yang JB (2017) A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega 73:37–48

Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM, Yager RR (2015) An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Appl Soft Comput 27:420–433

Merigó JM, Cancino CA, Coronado F, Urbano D (2016) Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics 108:559–593

Merigó JM, Pedrycz W, Weber R, de la Sotta C (2018) Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Inf Sci 432:245–268

Miemczyk J, Johnsen TE, Macquet M (2012) Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Manag 17:478–496

Mingers J, Xu F (2010) The drivers of citations in management science journals. Eur J Oper Res 205:422–430

Oliver RK, Webber MD (1982) Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy. Outlook 5:42–47

Pilkington A, Liston-Heyes C (1999) Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study. Int J Oper Prod Man 19:7–20

Pritchard A (1969) Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc 25:348–349

Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Man 25:898–916

Sarkis J (2012) A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17:202–216

Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16:1699–1710

Shiau WL, Dwivedi YK, Tsai CH (2015) Supply chain management: exploring the intellectual structure. Scientometrics 105:215–230

Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 24:265–269

Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9:53–80

Thomé AMT, Scavarda A, Ceryno PS, Remmen A (2016) Sustainable new product development: a longitudinal review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:2195–2208

Tiwari S, Wee HM, Daryanto Y (2018) Big data analytics in supply chain management between 2010 and 2016: insights to industries. Comput Ind Eng 115:319–330

Tseng ML, Tan K, Chiu AS (2016) Identifying the competitive determinants of firms’ green supply chain capabilities under uncertainty. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:1247–1262

Tsireme AI, Nikolaou EI, Georgantzis N, Tsagarakis KP (2012) The influence of environmental policy on the decisions of managers to adopt G-SCM practices. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14:953–964

Valenzuela LM, Merigó JM, Johnston WJ, Nicolas C, Jaramillo JF (2017) Thirty years of the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. J Bus Ind Mark 32:1–17

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538

Wang Q, Yang Z, Yang Y, Long C, Li H (2014) A bibliometric analysis of research on the risk of engineering nanomaterials during 1999–2012. Sci Total Environ 473:483–489

Wang W, Laengle S, Merigó JM, Yu D, Herrera-Viedma E, Cobo MJ, Bouchon-Meunier B (2018) A bibliometric analysis of the first twenty-five years of the International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 26:169–193

White HD, McCain K (1989) Bibliometrics. Ann Rev Inf Sci Technol 24:119–186

White L, Smith H, Currie C (2011) OR in developing countries: a review. Eur J Oper Res 208:1–11

Wong C, Skipworth H, Godsell J, Achimugu N (2012) Towards a theory of supply chain alignment enablers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manag 17:419–437

Zhao L, Deng J, Sun P, Liu J, Ji Y, Nakada N, Yang Y (2018) Nanomaterials for treating emerging contaminants in water by adsorption and photocatalysis: systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Sci Total Environ 627:1253–1263

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 690, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

Keivan Amirbagheri, Ana Núñez-Carballosa & Laura Guitart-Tarrés

Department of Management Control and Information Systems, School of Economics and Business, University of Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay 257, 8330015, Santiago, Chile

José M. Merigó

School of Information, Systems and Modelling, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, 81 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keivan Amirbagheri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Amirbagheri, K., Núñez-Carballosa, A., Guitart-Tarrés, L. et al. Research on green supply chain: a bibliometric analysis. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21 , 3–22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1624-1

Download citation

Received : 18 July 2018

Accepted : 03 October 2018

Published : 15 October 2018

Issue Date : 15 January 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1624-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Green supply chain
• Bibliometric approach
• Web of Science
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Popular Keywords

Research directory.

• Semiconductor Research
• Display Research
• Optoelectronics Research
• Green Energy Research
• ICT Applications Research
• Semiconductors
• Wafer Foundries
• Compound Semiconductor
• AI Server/HBM/Server
• Upstream Components
• Panel Industry
• Display Supply Chain
• Display Technologies
• LED Demand / Supply Data Base
• Sapphire Market
• LED Chip & Package
• LED Backlight
• LED Lighting
• LED Display
• IR LED / VCSEL / LiDAR Laser
• UV LED / UV Laser
• MicroLED / Mini LED
• Lithium Battery and Energy Storage
• Consumer Electronics
• Notebook Computers
• Smartphones
• Monitors / AIO
• Emerging Technologies
• Cloud / Edge Computing
• Automotive Technologies

Selected Topics

• Telecommunications
• Computer System
• Automotive & EV
• Green Energy & Storage
• Display Panel & LED
• DRAM (Index)
• TFT-LCD (Index)
• Li-Ion Battery
• Press Center
• Beta DataTrack
• [News] SK Innovation Reportedly Plans to Sell Battery Material Subsidiary SKIET

The global electric vehicle market has begun to show signs of saturation, affecting the battery supply chain. According to a report from Korean media Maeil Business , in response to the downturn in battery demand, South Korea’s SK Group holding company, SK Innovation, intends to sell its subsidiary SK IE Technology (SKIET) to raise funds and strengthen its financial position.

The report cited sources, indicating that SK Innovation is actively seeking investors for capital injection and has begun negotiations. Additionally, the possibility of selling its battery material subsidiary, SKIET, may not be ruled out as a consideration to obtain cash for flexible use, in response to the shrinking appetite in the battery market.

As per a report from MoneyDJ , SK Innovation holds a 61.2% stake in SKIET, valued at KRW 2.5 trillion (approximately USD 1.8 billion).

Industry sources further pointed out that SK Innovation’s decision to sell SKIET is primarily driven by the need for additional funds to expand its electric vehicle battery business under SK On, including the expansion of its battery factories in the United States, according to the aforementioned reports.

Reportedly, SK On anticipates capital expenditures of KRW 7.5 trillion this year. However, the sources believe that whether SK Innovation can find a buyer for SKIET remains to be seen, given SKIET’s poor performance.

SK On’s clients include well-known automakers such as Ford, Volkswagen, and Hyundai. However, in a high-interest-rate environment, global electric vehicle sales have stalled, leading SK On to incur a significant operating loss of KRW 332 billion in the first quarter, far exceeding the KRW 18.6 billion loss in the previous quarter.

• [News] Chip to be the Game Changer in EV Market, Battery Becomes the Past

(Photo credit: SK Innovation)

Please note that this article cites information from Maeil Business  and  MoneyDJ .

Related Articles

• [News] TSMC Confirms Construction for Its First European Chip Plant to Commence in Q4, as Scheduled

• [News] Wave Goodbye to Samsung Next Year? Google Rumored to Collaborate with TSMC in Its Pixel 10 Lineup, Featuring 3nm SoC

• [News] SMIC Reportedly to Manufacture 5nm Chips for Huawei Without EUV Machinery
• Search for:

Recent Posts

• [News] Progress Made in Chinese Consortium’s Development of HBM, Reportedly Targeting HBM2 Production by 2026

Recent Comments

• Panel Costs Account for More Than 60% of 21.5-inch Monitor Retail Prices, with LCD Monitor Panel Prices Likely to Keep Rising on Panel Costs Account for More Than 60% of 21.5-inch Monitor Retail Prices, with LCD Monitor Panel Prices Likely to Keep Rising
• February 2024
• January 2024
• December 2023
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• February 2022
• January 2022
• December 2021
• November 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• 5G Technologies
• Artificial Intelligence
• Broadband & Home Network
• IC Manufacturing, Package&Test
• Industry 4.0
• Micro LED / Mini LED
• Wearable Devices
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS
• WordPress.org

Get in touch with us